A second chance: analyzing trends and outcomes for reapplicants in orthopaedic surgery

Edward L. Major; Vivek P. Shah; James R. Goetz; Sameer Badarudeen

doi:10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20252619

Authors

Edward L. Major Department of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
Vivek P. Shah Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, McLaren Health Corporation, Grand Blanc, MI, USA
James R. Goetz Department of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
Sameer Badarudeen Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20252619

Keywords:

Career development, Orthopaedic surgery, Research experience, Residency reapplication, Unmatched applicants

Abstract

Background: The increasing number of applicants for orthopaedic surgery residency programs, paired with a static number of available positions, has resulted in many candidates being unmatched. This study explored trends and factors associated with successful reapplication outcomes for unmatched orthopaedic surgery applicants.

Methods: This mixed-methods study was conducted between June 2024 and January 2025. Inclusion criteria for qualitative data were unmatched orthopaedic surgery applicants who subsequently matched and participated in interviews. Exclusion criteria included those who did not reapply or did not complete the interview process. Data were obtained from the Orthopaedic Residency Information Network (ORIN) and included demographics of current residents, attending faculty, and residency program characteristics. Gender of program leaders was verified through LinkedIn and program websites. Spearman correlation and ANOVA were used for analysis, with significant variables further examined through multiple regression. Qualitative insights were collected through interviews with previously unmatched applicants who matched on subsequent attempts.

Results: Analysis revealed no statistically significant associations between traditional metrics (e.g., USMLE scores, demographics) and matching outcomes (p>0.05). Qualitative data highlighted that engagement in research and clinical experiences, as well as meaningful mentorship, significantly impacted reapplication success.

Conclusions: Despite the lack of significant predictors from traditional metrics, proactive measures taken during the year off were crucial for unmatched applicants. Candidates should focus on strategic activities to enhance their competitiveness in future applications.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Schrock JB, Kraeutler MJ, Dayton MR, McCarty EC. A cross-sectional analysis of minimum usmle step 1 and 2 criteria used by orthopaedic surgery residency programs in screening residency applications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017;25(6):464-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00725

Bryant SA, Jardaly AH, Ponce BA, Guthrie ST, Slone H, Bruce JR. Reimagining the Path of an Unmatched Orthopaedic Residency Application: A Survey of Program Directors. JB JS Open Access 2023;8(3):e22.00044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.22.00044

Kheir MM, Tan TL, Rondon AJ, Chen AF. The Fate of Unmatched Orthopaedic Applicants: Risk Factors and Outcomes. JB JS Open Access. 2020;5(2):e20.00043. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.20.00043

Program NRM. Charting Outcomes in the Match: U.S. Allopathic Seniors 2014-2022. National Resident Matching Program. Available at: https://www.nrmp.org/match-data-analytics/ residency-data-reports/. Accessed on 15 November 2024.

Tishad A, Kass JD, Stinson G, Spiguel A. The path to success: an analysis of the subjective and objective characteristics of orthopaedic surgery applicants with program director insight. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2025;33(5):e274-e290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00421

Kotlier JL, Mihalic AP, Petrigliano FA, Liu JN. Understanding the match: the effect of signaling, demographics, and applicant characteristics on match success in the orthopaedic residency application process. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2024;32(5):e231-e239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-23-00613

de Araujo OB, O'Connell DJ, Allen AJ, Mitchell SL. Analysis of Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Match Results: 2016 to 2022. Cureus. 2024;16(12):e75203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.75203

Dhillon J, Kraeutler MJ, LaPorte DM, Eberson CP, Mulcahey MK. A comparison of match rates to orthopaedic surgery residency programs between first-time versus repeat applicants: an analysis of the national resident matching program data from 2018 to 2022. JB JS Open Access. 2023;8(3):e23.00045. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00045

Association AO. Orthopaedic Residency Information Network (ORIN®). Available at: https://www. aoassn.org/education/orthopaedic-residency-information-network/. Accessed November 15, 2024.

Akoglu H. User's guide to correlation coefficients. Turk J Emerg Med. 2018;18(3):91-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001

Sudah SY, Imam N, Sirch F, Nicholson AD, Namdari S, Menendez ME. Differences in the Academic attributes of matched and unmatched orthopaedic surgery residency applicants are narrowing. JB JS Open Access. 2023;8(2):e22.00138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.22.00138

Lombardi CV, Chidiac NT, Record BC, Laukka JJ. USMLE step 1 and step 2 CK as indicators of resident performance. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):543. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04530-8

Jarvis NR, Gendreau JL, Brown NJ, Noland SS. Increasing research output among orthopedic surgery applicants. J Surg Educ. 2023;80(1):15-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.08.019

Meyer AM, Karam MD, Keith JN. Educational factors and financial implications of medical students choosing and matching into orthopedic surgery. Iowa Orthop J. 2022;42(2):8-21.

Fuller C, Byrd JK, Groves M. Outcomes of reapplication to otolaryngology residency: A prospective cohort study. Ear Nose Throat J. 2018;97(9):324-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014556131809700922

Guthrie ST, Dagher T, Essey-Stapleton J, Balach T. Preference signaling in the orthopaedic surgery match: applicant and residency program attitudes, behaviors, and outcomes. JBJS Open Access. 2024;9(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00146

Ojo DE, Martinez VH, Zaheer A, Williamson TK, Baird MD, Dingle M. A 25-year analysis of diversity, equity, and inclusion research in orthopaedics shows majority female authorship and increasing gender parity research. JB JS Open Access. 2023;8(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00073

Pletcher SD, Chang CWD, Thorne MC, Malekzadeh S. The otolaryngology residency program preference signaling experience. Acad Med. 2022;97(5):664-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004441

He K, Stolarski A, Whang E, Kristo G. Addressing general surgery residents' concerns in the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. J Surg Educ. 2020;77(4):735-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.04.003