Evaluating functional recovery following proximal femoral nail fixation in proximal femoral fractures: a study from a developing nation

Raj Kumar; Gur-Aziz S. Sindhu; Manavdeep Singh; Saphalya Pattnaik

doi:10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20252620

Authors

Raj Kumar Department of Orthopedics, Kanta Devi Medical College and Hospital, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India
Gur-Aziz S. Sindhu Department of Orthopaedics, UHL, London, UK; Department of Orthopedics, Dayanand Meddical College & Hospital, Ludhiana, India
Manavdeep Singh Department of Orthopaedics, New life Hospital, Jalandhar, Punjab, India
Saphalya Pattnaik Department of Orthopaedics, UHL, London, UK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20252620

Keywords:

Proximal femoral fracture, Proximal femoral nail, Intertrochanteric fracture fixation, Internal fixation

Abstract

Background: Intramedullary fixation systems have become increasingly favoured over conventional dynamic hip screws in the treatment of proximal femoral fractures. This shift is attributed to several key benefits, including reduced soft tissue trauma, shorter operative times, and enhanced biomechanical properties.

Methods: A prospective randomised study was carried out at Dayanand Medical College and Hospital Ludhiana, India between January 2016 and January 2017, with proximal femoral fractures. Exclusion criteria included paediatric cases, pathological or neglected fractures, periprosthetic fractures, and femoral neck fractures. The primary aim was to evaluate fracture union and functional recovery, while secondary outcomes focused on identifying any postoperative complications.

Results: Among the 35 participants (19 males and 16 females), the average age was 59.8 years. Subtrochanteric fractures were more prevalent in older individuals, with a higher incidence on the left side. Domestic falls accounted for 52% of the injuries, while 48% resulted from road traffic accidents. The surgical procedure involved an average blood loss of 197 ml and lasted approximately 142 minutes. Fracture union was achieved in 95.23% of the cases, while implant failure was observed in 9.52%. Functional assessments showed that 68% of patients had excellent to good recovery outcomes, with minimal complications reported postoperatively.

Conclusions: Proximal femoral nail (PFN) provides secure fixation with high union rate and positive functional outcomes reinforcing its preference over traditional extramedullary fixation methods. Further comparative analyses are required with larger sample sizes to refine the choice of fixation for different fracture types.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Boyd HB, Griffin LL. Classification and treatment of trochanteric fractures. Arch Surg. 1949;58(6):853-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1949.01240030864012

Wolfgang GL, Bryant MH, O'Neill JP. Treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of the femur using sliding screw plate fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;163:148-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-198203000-00022

French BG, Tornetta P 3rd. Use of an interlocked cephalomedullary nail for subtrochanteric fracture stabilization. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;348:95-100.

Zickel RE. An intramedullary fixation device for the proximal part of the femur. Nine years' experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58(6):866-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-197658060-00021

Fogagnolo F, Kfuri M Jr, Paccola CA. Intramedullary fixation of pertrochanteric hip fractures with the short AO-ASIF proximal femoral nail. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004;124(1):31-7.

Liu Y, Tao R, Liu F, Wang Y, Zhou Z, Cao Y, et al. Mid-term outcomes after intramedullary fixation of peritrochanteric femoral fractures using the new proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA). Injury. 2010;41(8):810-7.

French BG, Tornetta P 3rd. Use of an interlocked cephalomedullary nail for subtrochanteric fracture stabilization. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;(348):95-100.

Wu CC, Shih CH, Lee ZL. Subtrochanteric fractures treated with interlocking nailing. J Trauma. 1991;31(3):326-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199103000-00004

Kamboj P, Siwach RC, Kundu ZS, Sangwan S, Walecha P, Singh R. Results of modified proximal femoral nail in peritrochanteric fractures in adults. Internet J Orthop Surg. 2007;6:2.

Al-yassari G, Langstaff RJ, Jones JW, Al-Lami M. The AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail (PFN) for the treatment of unstable trochanteric femoral fracture. Injury. 2002;33(5):395-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(02)00008-6

Simmermacher RK, Bosch AM, Van der Werken C. The AO/ASIF-proximal femoral nail (PFN): a new device for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures. Injury. 1999;30(5):327-32.

Pajarinen J, Lindahl J, Michelsson O, Savolainen V, Hirvensalo E. Pertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with a dynamic hip screw or a proximal femoral nail. A randomised study comparing post-operative rehabilitation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(1):76-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.87B1.15249

Wang WY, Yang TF, Fang Y, Lei MM, Wang GL, Liu L. Treatment of subtrochanteric femoral fracture with long proximal femoral nail antirotation. Chin J Traumatol. 2010;13(1):37-41.

Liu Y, Tao R, Liu F, Wang Y, Zhou Z, Cao Y, et al. Mid-term outcomes after intramedullary fixation of peritrochanteric femoral fractures using the new proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA). Injury. 2010;41(8):810-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2010.03.020

Simmermacher RK, Bosch AM, Van der Werken C. The AO/ASIF-proximal femoral nail (PFN): a new device for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures. Injury. 1999;30(5):327-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(99)00091-1

Kamboj P, Siwach RC, Kundu ZS, Sangwan S, Walecha P, Singh R. Results of modified proximal femoral nail in peritrochanteric fractures in adults. Internet J Orthop Surg. 2007;6:2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5580/24e3

Ekström W, Karlsson-Thur C, Larsson S, Ragnarsson B, Alberts KA. Functional outcome in treatment of unstable trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures with the proximal femoral nail and the Medoff sliding plate. J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21(1):18-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e31802b41cf

Borens O, Wettstein M. Long Gamma nail in the treatment of subtrochanteric fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004;124(7):443-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-004-0711-4

Fogagnolo F, Kfuri M Jr, Paccola CA. Intramedullary fixation of pertrochanteric hip fractures with the short AO-ASIF proximal femoral nail. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004;124(1):31-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-003-0586-9

Boldin C, Seibert FJ, Fankhauser F, Peicha G, Grechenig W, Szyszkowitz R. The proximal femoral nail (PFN)--a minimal invasive treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a prospective study of 55 patients with a follow-up of 15 months. Acta Orthop Scand. 2003;74(1):53-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470310013662

French BG, Tornetta P 3rd. Use of an interlocked cephalomedullary nail for subtrochanteric fracture stabilization. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;(348):95-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199803000-00016

Miedel R, Ponzer S, Törnkvist H, Söderqvist A, Tidermark J. The standard Gamma nail or the Medoff sliding plate for unstable trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures. A randomised, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(1):68-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.87B1.15295