Effective outcomes of home-based unsupervised rehabilitation protocol after rotator cuff repair: a prospective study

Authors

  • Jugaratna Khatua Department of Orthopaedics, SCB Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack, Odisha, India
  • Somnath Baskey Department of Orthopaedics, SCB Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack, Odisha, India
  • Manmatha Nayak Department of Orthopaedics, SCB Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack, Odisha, India
  • Gopabandhu Patra Department of Orthopaedics, SCB Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack, Odisha, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20251447

Keywords:

Rotator cuff repair, Home-based rehabilitation, Outcomes, Range of motion, Pain, DASH score

Abstract

Background: Rotator cuff tears, common in both elderly and athletic populations, require effective rehabilitation following surgical repair for optimal recovery. The study evaluates the outcomes of a patient-led home-based rehabilitation program after rotator cuff repair.

Methods: This prospective study was conducted at SCB Medical College and Hospital, Cuttack, with 46 patients who underwent rotator cuff repair via mini-open incision. A structured home-based rehabilitation program was followed, with outcomes assessed at one year using visual analogue scale (VAS), disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) score, range of motion, and cuff strength.

Results: Postoperative VAS score improved from 7.3 to 1.5, and the DASH score decreased from 35.0 to 5.2. Range of motion significantly improved in active abduction, forward flexion, and external rotation. Ninety-one percent of patients returned to work within three months, though five failures were noted, including one with stiffness and four with retear.

Conclusions: The home-based rehabilitation program resulted in significant pain relief and functional recovery, with a high return-to-work rate. The study suggests that home-based rehabilitation is a viable alternative to supervised physiotherapy.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Beaudreuil J, Dhénain M, Coudane H, Mlika-Cabanne N. Clinical practice guidelines for the surgical management of rotator cuff tears in adults. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010;96:175-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2010.02.002

Huisstede BM, Koes BW, Gebremariam L, Keijsers E, Verhaar JA. Current evidence for effectiveness of interventions to treat rotator cuff tears. Man Ther. 2011;16:217-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2010.10.012

Hayes K, Ginn KA, Walton JR, Szomor ZL, Murrell GA. A randomised clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of physiotherapy after rotator cuff repair. Aust J Physiother. 2004;50:77-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60099-4

Roddey TS, Olson SL, Gartsman GM, Hanten WP, Cook KF. A randomized controlled trial comparing two instructional approaches to home exercise instruction following arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair surgery. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2002;32:548-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2002.32.11.548

Büker NA, Akkaya S, Akkaya N. Comparison of the results of supervised physiotherapy program and home-based exercise program in patients treated with arthroscopic-assisted mini-open rotator cuff repair. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi. 2011;22(3):134-9.

Lee BG, Cho NS, Rhee YG. Effect of two rehabilitation protocols on range of motion and healing rates after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: aggressive versus limited early passive exercises. Arthroscopy. 2012;28(1):34-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2011.07.012

Baumgarten KM, Vidal AF, Wright RW. Rotator cuff rehabilitation. A level 1 and level 2 systematic review. Sports Health. 2009;1(2):125-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738108331200

Holmgren T, Oberg B, Sjöberg I, Johansson K. Supervised strengthening exercises versus home-based movement exercises after arthroscopic acromioplasty: a randomized clinical trial. J Rehabil Med. 2012;44(1):12-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0889

Andersen NH, Sojbjerg JO, Johannsen HV, Sneppen O. Self-training versus physiotherapist-supervised rehabilitation of the shoulder in patients treated with arthroscopic subacromial decompression: a clinical randomized study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999;8:99-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1058-2746(99)90000-9

Lisinski P, Huber J, Wilkosz P, Witkowska A, Wytrazek M, Samborski W, et al. Supervised versus uncontrolled rehabilitation of patients after rotator cuff repair—clinical and neurophysiological comparative study. Int J Artif Organs. 2012;35:45-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5301/ijao.5000037

Longo UG, Berton A, Ambrogioni LR, Lo Presti D, Carnevale A, Candela V, et al. Cost-effectiveness of supervised versus unsupervised rehabilitation for rotator-cuff repair: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:2852. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082852

Song SJ, Jeong TH, Moon JW, Park HV, Lee SY, Koh KH. Short-term comparison of supervised rehabilitation and home-based rehabilitation for earlier recovery of shoulder motion, pain, and function after rotator cuff repair. Clin Shoulder Elbow. 2018;21(1):15-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5397/cise.2018.21.1.15

Gallagher BP, Bishop ME, Tjoumakaris FP, Freedman KB. Early versus delayed rehabilitation following arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a systematic review. Phys Sportsmed. 2015;43(2):178-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00913847.2015.1025683

Downloads

Published

2025-05-17

How to Cite

Khatua, J., Baskey, S., Nayak, M., & Patra, G. (2025). Effective outcomes of home-based unsupervised rehabilitation protocol after rotator cuff repair: a prospective study. International Journal of Research in Orthopaedics, 11(4), 707–711. https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20251447

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles