Comparative analysis of proximal humerus internal locking system plating and external fixation in proximal humerus fracture management: a prospective study on functional outcomes

Authors

  • Chetan Kothari Bharati Vidyapeeth University Katraj, Pune, Maharashtra, India
  • Gopal Pundkare Bharati Vidyapeeth University Katraj, Pune, Maharashtra, India
  • Archan Desai Bharati Vidyapeeth University Katraj, Pune, Maharashtra, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20251139

Keywords:

Proximal humerus fractures, PHILOS plating, External fixation, DASH score, VAS

Abstract

Background: The management of proximal humerus fractures presents challenges due to their intricate anatomy and varied fracture patterns in NEER’S type 3,4. This prospective study aimed to compare functional outcomes between proximal humerus internal locking system (PHILOS) plating and external fixation ((UMEX).

Methods: Fifteen patients in each group, classified as NEER type 3 and 4 fractures were included. Patient demographics showed no significant age or gender differences between the groups. Patients’ selection was randomized.

Results: Functional assessment using disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) scores revealed superior outcomes in the external fixator group at 6 weeks (55.54±6.50 vs. 50.50±6.10), 3 months (66.91±5.34 vs. 61.67±7.08), and 6 months (77.83±2.79 vs. 65.29±5.15), with significant differences observed (p=6 weeks: 0.0370, 3 months: 0.0299, 6 months: <0.0001). Similarly, visual analogue score (VAS) scores demonstrated lower postoperative pain levels in the external fixator group at 6 weeks (2.85±1.21 vs. 4.14±1.10) and 6 months (0.33±0.52 vs. 1.00±0.58), with significant differences noted (p=0.0049 and p=0.0024). Furthermore, regarding range of motion, the external fixator group consistently outperformed the PHILOS group across all measured shoulder movements at 3 and 6 months, showing significant differences (abduction: p=0.0127, extension: p<0.0001, external rotation: p=0.0004, internal rotation: p=0.0002, flexion: p<0.0001).

Conclusions: These findings underscore the potential superiority of external fixation in achieving better clinical outcomes, lower pain levels, and improved range of motion compared to PHILOS plating in proximal humerus fracture management.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Relvas Silva M, Linhares D, Leite MJ, Nunes B, Torres J, Neves N et al. Proximal humerus fractures: epidemiology and trends in surgical management of hospital-admitted patients in Portugal. JSES Int. 2022;6(3):380-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2021.12.003

Pencle F, Varacallo M. Proximal Humerus Fracture. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. 2024.

Razaeian S, Wiese B, Zhang D, Harb A, Krettek C, Hawi N. Nonsensus in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures: uncontrolled, blinded, comparative behavioural analysis between Homo chirurgicus accidentus and Macaca sylvanus. BMJ. 2020;371:m4429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m4429

Baker HP, Gutbrod J, Strelzow JA, Maassen NH, Shi L. Management of Proximal Humerus Fractures in Adults-A Scoping Review. J Clin Med. 2022;11(20):6140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11206140

Taskesen A, Göçer A, Uzel K, Yaradılmış YU. Effect of Osteoporosis on Proximal Humerus Fractures. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2020;11:2151459320985399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2151459320985399

Handoll HH, Elliott J, Thillemann TM, Aluko P, Brorson S. Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022;6(6):CD000434. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000434.pub5

Kumar GN, Sharma G, Sharma V, Jain V, Farooque K, Morey V. Surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures using PHILOS plate. Chin J Traumatol. 2014;17(5):279-84.

Hadeed A, Werntz RL, Varacallo M. External Fixation Principles and Overview. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. 2024.

Gupta AK, Gupta M, Sengar G, Nath R. Functional outcome of closed fractures of proximal humerus managed by Joshi's external stabilizing system. Indian J Orthop. 2012;46(2):216-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.93679

Brunner A, Thormann S, Babst R. Minimally invasive percutaneous plating of proximal humeral shaft fractures with the Proximal Humerus Internal Locking System (PHILOS). J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21(8):1056-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.05.016

Chen X, Yu ZX, Wang HY, Shen F, Lin GB, Wang S, et al. Proximal humeral internal locking plate combined with a custom neutral-position shoulder and elbow sling for proximal humerus fractures: A randomized study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(17):e15271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015271

Jordan RW, Modi CS. A review of management options for proximal humeral fractures. Open Orthop J. 2014;8:148-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325001408010148

Spross C, Platz A, Rufibach K, Lattmann T, Forberger J, Dietrich M. The PHILOS plate for proximal humeral fractures--risk factors for complications at one year. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72(3):783-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31822c1b5b

Marsh JL, Mahoney CR, Steinbronn D. External fixation of open humerus fractures. Iowa Orthop J. 1999;19:35-42.

Thyagarajan DS, Haridas SJ, Jones D, Dent C, Evans R, Williams R. Functional outcome following proximal humeral interlocking system plating for displaced proximal humeral fractures. Int J Shoulder Surg. 2009;3(3):57-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-6042.59971

Patel YC, Majumdar S, Shah S, Lathiya H, Bhadani A. Study of outcome of proximal humerus fracture treated with proximal humerus internal locking system (Philos) plating. Int J Orthop Sci. 2023;9(2):117-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22271/ortho.2023.v9.i2b.3359

Hirschmann MT, Fallegger B, Amsler F, Regazzoni P, Gross T. Clinical longer-term results after internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures with a locking compression plate (PHILOS). J Orthop Trauma. 2011;25(5):286-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181f2b20e

Doshi C, Sharma GM, Naik LG, Badgire KS, Qureshi F. Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures using PHILOS Plate. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(7):RC10-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/26782.10304

Geiger EV, Maier M, Kelm A, Wutzler S, Seebach C, Marzi I. Functional outcome and complications following PHILOS plate fixation in proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2010;44(1):1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3944/AOTT.2010.2270

Zhang J, Ebraheim N, Lause GE. Surgical treatment of proximal humeral fracture with external fixator. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21(7):882-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.07.005

Ricardo M. External fixation for proximal humerus fractures in elderly patients. Ortho Rheum Open Access J. 2021;18(5):555996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19080/OROAJ.2021.18.555996

Aggarwal S, Bali K, Dhillon MS, Kumar V, Mootha AK. Displaced proximal humeral fractures: an Indian experience with locking plates. J Orthop Surg Res. 2010;5:60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-5-60

Downloads

Published

2025-04-25

How to Cite

Kothari, C., Pundkare, G., & Desai, A. (2025). Comparative analysis of proximal humerus internal locking system plating and external fixation in proximal humerus fracture management: a prospective study on functional outcomes. International Journal of Research in Orthopaedics, 11(3), 588–595. https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20251139

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles