Outcome of dynamization in delayed union of femoral shaft fracture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20253406Keywords:
Nail dynamization, Femoral shaft fracture, Delayed union, Intramedullary nailing, Fracture healing index, Smoking and fracture healing, Orthopedic surgeryAbstract
Background: Delayed union in femoral shaft fractures presents a significant clinical challenge despite the widespread success of intramedullary nailing (IMN). Nail dynamization is a minimally invasive and cost-effective intervention that promotes healing by increasing interfragmentary motion. This study evaluates the clinical and radiological outcomes of nail dynamization in delayed union cases and identifies key prognostic factors influencing healing.
Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted at the National Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedic Rehabilitation (NITOR), Bangladesh, between March 2019 and March 2024. Twenty-four patients with delayed union of femoral shaft fractures, initially treated with static interlocking IMN, underwent dynamization. Radiological and functional outcomes were assessed, and statistical analyses were performed to identify predictors of union.
Results: The mean time from nailing to dynamization was 21.1±2.6 weeks, with a mean union time of 21.4±1.4 weeks. 79.17% of patients achieved union, while 20.83% progressed to nonunion. Earlier dynamization correlated significantly with higher union rates (p=0.01). Smoking was a major risk factor for nonunion (p=0.047), with 93.33% of nonunion cases occurring in smokers. FHI was a strong predictor of union (p=0.002), with higher FHI values associated with successful healing. Functional outcomes were excellent in 62.50% of patients, and 66.67% reported no pain at the final follow-up.
Conclusion: Nail dynamization is a clinically effective and low-cost intervention for delayed union of femoral shaft fractures. Timely dynamization and higher FHI values significantly predict successful healing, while smoking negatively impacts outcomes. These findings highlight the need for early intervention and patient-specific treatment strategies to optimize fracture healing.
Metrics
References
Agarwal-Harding KJ, Meara JG, Greenberg SLM, Hagander LE, Zurakowski D, Dyer GSM. Estimating the global incidence of femoral fracture from road traffic collisions: a literature review. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(6):31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.00314
Agarwal-Harding KJ, Chokotho L, Young S, Mkandawire N, Losina E, Katz JN. A nationwide survey investigating the prevalence and incidence of adults with femoral shaft fractures receiving care in Malawian district and central hospitals. East Cent Afr J Surg. 2020;25(3):57.
Enninghorst N, McDougall D, Evans JA, Sisak K, Balogh ZJ. Population-based epidemiology of femur shaft fractures. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;74(6):1516-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31828c3dc9
Mody KS, Wu HH, Chokotho LC, Mkandawire NC, Young S, Lau BC, et al. The Socioeconomic consequences of femoral shaft fracture for patients in Malawi. Malawi Med J. 2023;35(3):141–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/mmj.v35i3.2
Wood GW. Intramedullary nailing of femoral and tibial shaft fractures. J Orthopaed Sci. 2006;11(6):657–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-006-1061-6
Wild M, Gehrmann S, Jungbluth P, Hakimi M, Thelen S, Betsch M, et al. Treatment Strategies for Intramedullary Nailing of Femoral Shaft Fractures. Orthopedics. 2010;33(10):447-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20100826-15
Deng JieLin DJ. Complications of 109 cases of femoral shaft fracture with interlocking intramedullary nail fixation and treatment measures. 2010.
Tay WH, de Steiger R, Richardson M, Gruen R, Balogh ZJ. Health outcomes of delayed union and nonunion of femoral and tibial shaft fractures. Injury. 2014;45(10):1653–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2014.06.025
Ekegren CL, Edwards ER, de Steiger R, Gabbe BJ. Incidence, Costs and Predictors of Non-Union, Delayed Union and Mal-Union Following Long Bone Fracture. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(12):2845. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15122845
Hamahashi K, Uchiyama Y, Kobayashi Y, Ebihara G, Ukai T, Watanabe M. Clinical outcomes of intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures with third fragments: a retrospective analysis of risk factors for delayed union. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2019;4(1):203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/tsaco-2018-000203
Hak DJ, Lee SS, Goulet JA. Success of exchange reamed intramedullary nailing for femoral shaft nonunion or delayed union. J Orthop Trauma. 2000;14(3):178–82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200003000-00005
Sethi DA, Mishra DAK, Kaleem DMB, Badoni DN, Bhandari DA, Singh DP, et al. Exchange nailing with Uni-cortical plate augmentation +/- bone grafting for proximal 2/3rd distal 1/3rd junction shaft non-union femur. Int J Orthop Sci. 2021;7(3):404–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22271/ortho.2021.v7.i3f.2781
Syed MK, Ahmad W, Haider SI, Mazharrafique M, Ali Z, Iqbal M. Derotational Plate Augmentation with Retention of Intramedullary Interlocking Nail in Resistant Nonunion at Distal Femur Shaft. Pakistan J Med Health Sci. 2022;16(09):189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs22169189
Gelalis ID, Politis AN, Arnaoutoglou CM, Korompilias AV, Pakos EE, Vekris MD, et al. Diagnostic and treatment modalities in nonunions of the femoral shaft. A review. Injury. 2012;43(7):980–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.030
Vaughn J, Gotha H, Cohen E, Fantry AJ, Feller RJ, Van Meter J, et al. Nail Dynamization for Delayed Union and Nonunion in Femur and Tibia Fractures. Orthopedics. 2016;39(6):1117–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20160819-01
Wang G, Pan T, Peng X, Wang J. A new intramedullary nailing device for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures: a biomechanical study. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2008;23(3):305–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.10.017
Singh VB, Chaurasia A. Study of outcome following nail dynamization for treating delayed healing femoral shaft fractures. JEMDS. 2015;4(93):15893–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/2015/2309
Wójcik K, Bielecki T, Polak D, Pióro A, Rydel P, Jędrusik-Pawłowska M. Assessment of femur shaft fractures healing treated by closed locked intramedullary nailing in reference to other methods of osteosynthesis and including indications to dynamization. J Orthopaed Trauma Surg Related Res. 2016;2:987-9.
Sonbol AM, Almulla AA, Hetaimish BM, Taha WS, Mohmmedthani TS, Alfraidi TA, et al. Prevalence of femoral shaft fractures and associated injuries among adults after road traffic accidents in a Saudi Arabian trauma center. J Musculoskel Surg Res. 2018;2:62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/jmsr.jmsr_42_17
Almigdad A, Mustafa A, Alazaydeh S, Alshawish M, Bani Mustafa M, Alfukaha H. Bone Fracture Patterns and Distributions according to Trauma Energy. Vitiello R, editor. Advan Orthoped. 2022;2022:1–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8695916
Weiss RJ, Montgomery SM, Dabbagh ZA, Jansson KÅ. National data of 6409 Swedish inpatients with femoral shaft fractures: Stable incidence between 1998 and 2004. Injury. 2009;40(3):304–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2008.07.017
Kraus KR, Flores JW, Slaven JE, Sharma I, Arnold PK, Mullis BH, et al. A Scoring System for Predicting Nonunion After Intramedullary Nailing of Femoral Shaft Fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2024;8(9):214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00214
Giannoudis PV, Kanakaris NK, Bouamra O, Tsiridis E, Lecky F. Prevalence, characteristics and mortality of open vs closed femoral fractures. Orthopaed Proceed. 2012;94(4):69.
Zhu ZG, Yu YY, Lin-jun H, Gai W, Yang Y. Treatment of femoral shaft fractures by closed reduction and interlocking intramedullary nailing. China J Orthopaed Traumatol. 2014;27(10):819–22.
Vicenti G, Bizzoca D, Carrozzo M, Nappi V, Rifino F, Solarino G, et al. The ideal timing for nail dynamization in femoral shaft delayed union and non-union. Int Orthopaed. 2019;43(1):217–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-4129-y
Pal SK, Mishra D, Narayan S. Prospective study on functional outcome of fracture shaft of femur (Winquest Hansen type 1, 2 and 3) treated with intramedullary interlocking nail. Int J Orthopaed. 2021;7(1):162–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22271/ortho.2021.v7.i1c.2476
Moumni M, Voogd EH, ten Duis HJ, Wendt KW. Long-term functional outcome following intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures. Injury. 2012;43(7):1154-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2012.03.011
Gadegone WM, Lokhande V, Salphale Y, Ramteke A. Long proximal femoral nail in ipsilateral fractures proximal femur and shaft of femur. Indian J Orthopaed. 2013;47(3):272-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.109441
Perumal R, Shankar V, Basha R, Jayaramaraju D, Rajasekaran S. Is nail dynamization beneficial after twelve weeks - An analysis of 37 cases. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2018;9(4):322–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2017.12.007
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
