Inpatient temporal trends in open and minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusions

Kanwar Parhar; Benjamin R. Caruso; Gabriel Alemayehu; Richard Rapport

doi:10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20251118

Authors

Kanwar Parhar Washington State University Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Spokane, Washington, USA
Benjamin R. Caruso Washington State University Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Spokane, Washington, USA
Gabriel Alemayehu Washington State University Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Spokane, Washington, USA
Richard Rapport Washington State University Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Spokane, Washington, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20251118

Keywords:

Sacroiliac joint dysfunction, Lower back pain, Sacroiliac joint fusion

Abstract

Background: Lower back pain is a leading cause of disability worldwide, with sacroiliac joint dysfunction implicated in 15-30% of chronic cases. For this a sacroiliac joint fusion (SIJF) may be performed using either open or minimally invasive surgery (MIS) techniques. Prior to the introduction of unique ICD-PCS codes in 2015, there was limited data on the surgical variables for the different techniques. This study aims to evaluate open and MIS inpatient case trends from 2016-2020.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of the national inpatient sample database from 2016 to 2020 was conducted. Patients were identified using ICD-10 PCS codes for open and MIS SIJF procedures. Temporal trends and geographic distribution were analyzed, with demographic and procedural data compared using statistical tests including Mann-Kendall, t-tests, and Chi-square.

Results: Among 38,660 inpatient SIJF procedures, 34,590 were open and 3,890 were MIS. The procedures were primarily performed on females, identifying as white, Medicare payers and in urban teaching hospitals (p<0.001). No significant temporal trends in procedural volume were observed for open (p=0.807) or MIS (p=0.462) SIJF from 2016-2020. However, regional analysis revealed majority of the procedures taking place in the Southern region of the United States (p<0.001).

Conclusions: Inpatient SIJF volumes remained stable from 2016-2020, with most procedures performed in the South. These findings align with the increasing shift toward outpatient MIS SIJF, as inpatient volumes did not rise despite greater MIS adoption. Future studies should examine outpatient trends to further characterize this shift.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Wu A, March L, Zheng X, Huang J, Wang X, Zhao J, et al. Global low back pain prevalence and years lived with disability from 1990 to 2017: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8(6):299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2020.02.175

Dydyk AM, Forro SD, Hanna A. Sacroiliac Joint Injury. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. 2024.

Vleeming A, Schuenke MD, Masi AT, Carreiro JE, Danneels L, Willard FH. The sacroiliac joint: an overview of its anatomy, function and potential clinical implications. J Anat. 2012;221(6):537-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2012.01564.x

Gartenberg A, Nessim A, Cho W. Sacroiliac joint dysfunction: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Eur Spine J. 2021;30(10):2936-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06927-9

Ha KY, Lee JS, Kim KW. Degeneration of sacroiliac joint after instrumented lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: a prospective cohort study over five-year follow-up. Spine. 2008;33(11):1192-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318170fd35

Chuang CW, Hung SK, Pan PT, Kao MC. Diagnosis and interventional pain management options for sacroiliac joint pain. Ci Ji Yi Xue Za Zhi Tzu-Chi Med J. 2019;31(4):207-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_54_19

Rupert MP, Lee M, Manchikanti L, Datta S, Cohen SP. Evaluation of sacroiliac joint interventions: a systematic appraisal of the literature. Pain Physician. 2009;12(2):399-418. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36076/ppj.2009/12/399

Maas ET, Ostelo RWJG, Niemisto L, Jousimaa J, Hurri H, Malmivaara A, et al. Radiofrequency denervation for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2015(10):CD008572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008572.pub2

Ayhan E, Kesmezacar H, Akgun I. Intraarticular injections (corticosteroid, hyaluronic acid, platelet rich plasma) for the knee osteoarthritis. World J Orthop. 2014;5(3):351-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v5.i3.351

Buchanan P, Lee DW, Comer A, Hussaini Z, Grillo C, Vodapally S, et al. Best Practices for Postoperative Management of Posterior Sacroiliac Joint Fusion. J Pain Res. 2022;15:1149-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S357123

Mehkri Y, Tishad A, Nichols S, Scott KW, Arias J, Lucke-Wold B, et al. Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: A Scoping Review. World Neurosurg. 2022;168:120-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2022.09.094

Yson SC, Sembrano JN, Polly DW. Sacroiliac Joint Fusion: Approaches and Recent Outcomes. PM R. 2019;11(1):S114-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.12198

Vanaclocha V, Herrera JM, Sáiz-Sapena N, Rivera-Paz M, Verdú-López F. Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion, Radiofrequency Denervation, and Conservative Management for Sacroiliac Joint Pain: 6-Year Comparative Case Series. Neurosurgery. 2018;82(1):48-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyx185

Rafaqat W, Ahmad T, Ibrahim MT, Kumar S, Bluman EM, Khan KS. Is minimally invasive orthopedic surgery safer than open? A systematic review of systematic reviews. Int J Surg Lond Engl. 2022;101:106616. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106616

Dengler J, Sturesson B, Kools D, Prestamburgo D, Cher D, van Eeckhoven E, et al. Referred leg pain originating from the sacroiliac joint: 6-month outcomes from the prospective randomized controlled iMIA trial. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016;158(11):2219-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-016-2953-7

Kelley KA, Tsikitis VL. Clinical Research Using the National Inpatient Sample: A Brief Review of Colorectal Studies Utilizing the NIS Database. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2019;32(1):33-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1673352

Federico VP, Zavras AG, Butler A, Nolte MT, Munim MA, Lopez GD, et al. Medicare Reimbursement Rates and Utilization Trends in Sacroiliac Joint Fusion. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2023;31(17):923-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00800

Ton A, Mertz K, Abdou M, Hang N, Mills ES, Hah RJ, et al. Nationwide Analysis of Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Trends: Regional Variations in Utilization and Population Characteristics. Glob Spine J. 2025;15(2):518-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682231196448

Hersh AM, Jimenez AE, Pellot KI, Gong JH, Jiang K, Khalifeh JM, et al. Contemporary Trends in Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Utilization in the Medicare Population by Specialty. Neurosurgery. 2023;93(6):1244-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1227/neu.0000000000002564

Halperin SJ, Dhodapkar MM, Jiang W, Elaydi A, Jordan YJ, Whang PG, et al. Evolving Trends in the Use of Sacroiliac Fusion From 2015 to 2020. Spine. 2024;49(8):577-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004684

Moore ML, Singh R, McQueen K, Doan MK, Dodd H, Makovicka JL, et al. Workforce Trends in Spinal Surgery: Geographic Distribution and Primary Specialty Characteristics from 2012 to 2017. World Neurosurg. 2021;156:e392-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2021.09.073

Irwin RW, Watson T, Minick RP, Ambrosius WT. Age, body mass index, and gender differences in sacroiliac joint pathology. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;86(1):37-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e31802b8554

Fiani B, Sekhon M, Doan T, Bowers B, Covarrubias C, Barthelmass M, et al. Sacroiliac Joint and Pelvic Dysfunction Due to Symphysiolysis in Postpartum Women. Cureus. 2021;13(10):e18619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18619