Clinical and radiological outcome of wide enbloc laminectomy with subaxial lateral mass screw fixation in patients of cervical spondylotic myelopathy with ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament:  a prospective observational study

Lokendra Singh Chauhan; Lakshit Suthar; Cheemullu Shivashankar Shreyas; Mahendra Singh Tak

doi:10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20251134

Authors

Lokendra Singh Chauhan Department of Orthopedics, Dr Sampurnanand Medical College, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
Lakshit Suthar Department of Orthopedics, Dr Sampurnanand Medical College, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
Cheemullu Shivashankar Shreyas Department of Orthopedics, Dr Sampurnanand Medical College, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
Mahendra Singh Tak Department of Orthopedics, Dr Sampurnanand Medical College, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20251134

Keywords:

Spine, Vertebra, Laminectomy, Myelopathy, Ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament

Abstract

Background: Data evaluating the clinical and radiological outcome of wide enbloc laminectomy with sub-axial lateral mass screw fixation in patients of cervical spondylotic myelopathy with ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is scanty in the literature.

Methods: This is a prospective observational study aimed to know the clinical and radiological outcome of wide enbloc cervical laminectomy with sub-axial lateral mass screw fixation in patients of cervical spondylotic myelopathy associated with OPLL. A total of sixty patients were included in our study who underwent wide enbloc cervical laminectomy and sub axial lateral mass screw fixation and were followed up to 1 year postoperatively. Modified Japanese orthopedic association (MJOA) score was used for functional outcome calculation, which was done at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. We used C2-C7 Cobb’s angle as parameter of cervical alignment on lateral radiograph of cervical spine, modified Singh’s grading was used to asses cord compression on cervical spine MRI.

Results: There was significant improvement in MJOA score from preoperative (12.2) to one year postoperative (15.7). The mean improvement in MJOA was 3.5 points. The average neurological recovery rate was 60.34%. Overall, 90% patients showed improvement in MJOA score. Cervical alignment is maintained from preoperative 15 degree to postoperative 14.3 degree. The average decrease in cobb’s angle was 0.7 degree and cord compression value improved from preoperative 2.7 to postoperative 0.4 according to modified Singh’s grade.

Conclusions: Wide enbloc cervical laminectomy with sub-axial lateral mass screw fixation is a safe and effective treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy associated with OPLL providing a good functional outcome, maintaining adequate cervical alignment postoperatively.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

McCormick JR, Sama AJ, Schiller NC, Butler AJ, Donnally CJ. Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Guide to Diagnosis and Management. J Am Board Family Med. 2020;33(2):303-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2020.02.190195

Adams CB, Logue V. Studies in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. 3. Some functional effects of operations for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Brain. 1971;94(3):587-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/94.3.587

Miyazaki M, Kodera R, Yoshiiwa T, Kawano M, Kaku N, Tsumura H. Prevalence and distribution of thoracic and lumbar compressive lesions in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Asian Spine J. 2015;9(2):218-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2015.9.2.218

Edwards CC 2nd, Riew KD, Anderson PA, Hilibrand AS, Vaccaro AF. Cervical myelopathy. Current diagnostic and treatment strategies. Spine J. 2003;3(1):68-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1529-9430(02)00566-1

Ellingson BM, Salamon N, Hardy AJ, Holly LT. Prediction of neurological impairment in cervical spondylotic myelopathy using. a combination of diffusion MRI and Proton MR Spectroscopy. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0139451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139451

Abiola R, Rubery P, Mesfin A. Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: etiology, diagnosis, and outcomes of Nonoperative and Operative Management. Glob Spine J. 2016;6(2):195-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1556580

An HS, Al-Shihabi L, Kurd M. Surgical treatment for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine. J Am Acad Orthop Sur. 2014;22(7):420-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-22-07-420

Shriver MF, Lewis DJ, Kshettry VR, Rosenbaum BP, Benzel EC, Mroz TE. Pseudarthrosis rates in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: A meta-analysis. Spine J. 2015;15(9):2016-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2015.05.010

Kaptain GJ, Simmons NE, Replogle RE, Pobereskin L. Incidence and outcome of kyphotic deformity following laminectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Neurosurg. 2000;93(2):199-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/spi.2000.93.2.0199

Du W, Wang L, Shen Y, Zhang Y, Ding W, Ren L. Long term impacts of different posterior operations oncurvature, neurological recovery and axial symptoms for multilevel cervical degenerative myelopathy. Eur Spine J. 2013;22(7):1594-602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2741-5

Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Cailliet R, Troyanovich SJ, Janik TJ, Holland B. Cobb method or Harrison posterior tangent method: Which to choose for lateral cervical radiographic analysis. Spine. 2000;25(16):2072-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200008150-00011

Roy-Camille R, Saillant G, Bertreaux D, Marie-Anne S. Early management of spinal injuries. In: McKibben B, editor. Recent advances orthopedics. Edinburgh: Churchill-Livingstone. 1979;57-87.

Revanappa KK, Rajshekhar V. Comparison of nurick grading system and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system in evaluation of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(9):1545-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1773-y

Hirabayashi K, Miyakawa J, Satomi K, Maruyama T, Wakano K. Operative results and postoperative progression of ossification among patients with ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine. 1981;6:354-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198107000-00005

Shibuya S, Komatsubara S, Oka S, Kanda Y, Arima N, Yamamoto T. Differences between subtotal corpectomy and laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spinal Cord. 2010;48(3):214-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2009.114

Houten JK, Cooper PR. Laminectomy and posterior cervical plating for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Effects on cervical alignment, spinal cord compression, and neurological outcome. Neurosurgery. 2003;52(5):1081-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000057746.74779.55

Matsunaga S, Sakou T. Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine: etiology and natural history. Spine. 2012;37(5):309-14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318241ad33

Choi BW, Song KJ, Chang H. Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a review of literature. Asian Spine J. 2011;5(4):267-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2011.5.4.267

Nakashima H, Tetreault LA, Nagoshi N, Aria N, Branko K, Paul MA, et al. Does age affect surgical outcomes in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy? Results from the prospective multicenter AOSpine International Study on 479 patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr. 2016;87(7):734-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2015-311074

Takamiya Y, Nagata K, Fukuda K, Akira S, Tatsuya I, Takajiro S. Cervical spine disorders in farm workers requiring neck extension actions. J Orthop Sci. 2006;11(3):235-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-006-1005-1

Raykar R, Bettaswamy G, Singh R. Retrospective and prospective analysis of clinical, radiological and prognostic factor affecting surgical denouement in ossified posterior longitudinal ligament: an institutional experience. Int Surg J. 2019;6(3):847-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20190518

Baaj AA, Smith DA, Vale FL, Uribe JS. Surgical approaches to thoracic ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. J Clin Neurosci. 2012;19(3):349-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2011.05.025

Guo Q, Ni B, Yang J, Kai L, Zhichao S, Fengjin Z, et al. Relation between alignments of upper and sub‐axial cervical spine: A radiological study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011;131(6):857. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-011-1265-x

Shamji MF, Mohanty C, Massicotte EM, Fehlings MG. The association of cervical spine alignment with neurologic recovery in a prospective cohort of patients with surgical myelopathy: Analysis of a series of 124 cases. World Neurosurg. 2016;86:112-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.09.044

Chang V, Lu DC, Hoffman H, Buchanan C, Holly LT. Clinical results of cervical laminectomy and fusion for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy in 58 consecutive patients. Surg Neurol Int. 2014;5(3):133- 7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/2152-7806.130670

Sakaura H, Hosono N, Mukai Y, Ishii T, Yoshikawa H. C5 palsy after decompression surgery for cervical laminoplasty: review of literature. Spine. 2003;28(21):2447-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000090833.96168.3F

Yi S, Yoon DH, Kim KN, Kim SH, Shin HC. Postoperative spinal epidural hematoma: Risk factor and clinical outcome. Yonsei Med J. 2006;47(3):326-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2006.47.3.326