A comparative analysis between the proximal femoral nail and dynamic hip screw in the management of unstable trochanter fracture of the femur
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20251123Keywords:
Comparative analysis, Femur, Dynamic hip screw, Proximal femoral nail, Unstable trochanteric fractureAbstract
Background: Trochanteric fractures are a growing public health concern, particularly as the population ages. This study aims to assess recovery and functional outcomes following treatment of trochanteric femoral fractures using either PFN or DHS. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of proximal femoral nail (PFN) and dynamic hip screw (DHS) in managing unstable trochanteric fractures of the femur.
Methods: This quasi-experimental study at the emergency and outpatient department of the National Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedic Rehabilitation (NITOR), Dhaka (July 2005-June 2007), included 30 patients with unstable trochanteric fractures, treated with proximal femoral nail (n=14) or dynamic hip screw (n=16). Surgeries were performed under spinal anesthesia, and outcomes, including union rate, complications, and functional results, were assessed and analyzed using SPSS (p<0.05).
Results: Out of the 33 patients initially included, 2 died and 1 were lost to follow-up, leaving 14 patients in the PFN group and 16 in the DHS group. The mean operation time was significantly longer for PFN (117.4 minutes) compared to DHS (72.3 minutes). A higher percentage of DHS patients required blood transfusions. Follow-up results showed that PFN patients experienced less pain, better hip movement, and higher Harris hip scores, with statistical significance in pain relief and functional outcomes.
Conclusions: The proximal femoral nail (PFN) is an effective treatment for unstable trochanteric femoral fractures, offering biomechanical stability, early weight-bearing, and a lower risk of wound infection compared to traditional methods.
Metrics
References
Andrew W. Hip and Femur. In: Bannister LH, Collins P, Day Son M, eds. Gray’s Anatomy: the anatomical basis of clinical practice. 38th edn. Churchill Livingstone; 2005:1431-1436.
Kyle RF. Fractures of the proximal part of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76(6):924-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199406000-00020
Lavelle DG. Fractures of hip. In: Canale S, edr. Campbells operative Orthopedics. 10th edn. Mosby Year Book; St. Louis, London; 1998:2873-2938.
Rockwood CA, Green DP. Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in Adults. 4th edn. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 1996.
Kannus P, Parkkari J, Sievänen H, Heinonen A, Vuori I, Järvinen M. Epidemiology of hip fractures. Bone. 1996;18(1):S57-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/8756-3282(95)00381-9
Evans EM, Wales SS. Trochanteric fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol. 1951;33(2):192-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.33B2.192
Ganz R, Thomas RJ, Hammerle CP. Trochanteric fractures of the femur: treatment and results. Clin Orthopaed Rel Res (1976-2007). 1979;138:30-40.
Hornby R, Evans JG, Vardon V. Operative or conservative treatment for trochanteric fractures of the femur. A randomised epidemiological trial in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol. 1989;71(4):619-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.71B4.2670950
Pajarinen J, Lindahl J, Michelsson O, Savolainen V, Hirvensalo E. Pertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with a dynamic hip screw or a proximal femoral nail: a randomised study comparing post-operative rehabilitation. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol. 2005;87(1):76-81.
Ecker ML. The treatment of trochanteric hip fractures. Using a compression screw. J Bone Joint Surg A. 1975;57(1):23-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-197557010-00004
Parker MJ, Pryor GA. The timing of surgery for proximal femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol. 1992;74(2):203-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.74B2.1544952
Simmermacher RK, Bosch AM, Van der Werken CH. The AO/ASIF-proximal femoral nail (PFN): a new device for the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures. Injury. 1999;30(5):327-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(99)00091-1
Domingo L, Cecilia D, Herrera A, Resines C. Trochanteric fractures treated with a proximal femoral nail. International orthopaedics. 2001;25:298-301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002640100275
Herrera A, Domingo L, Calvo A, Martinez A, Cuenca J. A comparative study of trochanteric fractures treated with the Gamma nail or the proximal femoral nail. International orthopaedics. 2002;26:365-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-002-0389-6
Al-Yassari G, Langstaff RJ, Jones JW, Al-Lami M. The AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail (PFN) for the treatment of unstable trochanteric femoral fracture. Injury. 2002;33(5):395-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(02)00008-6
Banan H, Al-Sabti A, Jimulia T, Hart AJ. The treatment of unstable, extracapsular hip fractures with the AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail (PFN)- our first 60 cases. Injury. 2002;33(5):401-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(02)00054-2
Boldin C, Seibert FJ, Fankhauser F, Peicha G, Grechenig W, Szyszkowitz R. The proximal femoral nail (PFN)-a minimal invasive treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a prospective study of 55 patients with a follow-up of 15 months. Acta Orthopaed Scand. 2003;74(1):53-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470310013662
Pajarinen J, Lindahl J, Michelsson O, Savolainen V, Hirvensalo E. Pertrochanteric femoral fractures treated with a dynamic hip screw or a proximal femoral nail: a randomised study comparing post-operative rehabilitation. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol. 2005;87(1):76-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.87B1.15249
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
