The role of matrix rhythm therapy in managing and breaking tissue adhesions

Authors

  • Arif Rizvi Department of Physiotherapy, Era University, Lucknow, UP, India
  • Sumit Asthana Department of Physiotherapy, Era University, Lucknow, UP, India
  • Zia Abbas Naqvi Department of Physiotherapy, Era University, Lucknow, UP, India
  • Tahzeeb Fatima Department of Physiotherapy, Era University, Lucknow, UP, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20251157

Keywords:

Matrix rhythm therapy, Tissue adhesions, Extracellular matrix, Fibrosis, Rehabilitation, Non-invasive therapy

Abstract

This article explores the potential of Matrix Rhythm Therapy (MRT) in addressing tissue adhesions, focusing on its relevance as a non-invasive and effective treatment modality. A systematic review of current literature was conducted using databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Search terms included "Matrix Rhythm Therapy," "tissue adhesions," "non-invasive treatments," and "mobility improvement." MRT demonstrates promising results in breaking tissue adhesions, improving mobility, and reducing pain by restoring cell matrix dynamics and tissue elasticity. MRT represents a viable adjunct or alternative to conventional treatments for tissue adhesions. Further research is required to standardize protocols and validate its efficacy across diverse clinical scenarios.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Diamond MP, Freeman ML. Clinical implications of postsurgical adhesions. Human Reproduction Update. 2001;7(6):567-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/7.6.567

Arung W, Meurisse M, Detry O. Pathophysiology and prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesions. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17(41):4545-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i41.4545

Zerega GS, Campeau JD. Peritoneal repair and post-surgical adhesion formation. Human Reproduction Update. 2001;7(6):547-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/7.6.547

Randoll UG, Mühldorfer-Fodor M. Matrix Rhythm Therapy: A paradigm shifts in therapeutic approaches. Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease. 2020;12:1-15.

Schneider U, Randoll UG. Cellular oscillations and extracellular matrix dynamics: Key to Matrix Rhythm Therapy. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(6):8423-31.

Becker CM. Mechanisms and therapies for adhesion-related pain: Insights from preclinical and clinical studies. Nature Reviews Endocrinol. 2015;11(6):329-39.

Holmdahl L, et al. Development of a model for studying post-surgical adhesions in rats. European Surgical Research. 1994;26(6):321-328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000129342

Wynn TA. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of fibrosis. The J Pathol. 2008;214(2):199-210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/path.2277

Li X. Adhesion-related small bowel obstruction after gynecologic surgery. J Minimally Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(3):406-11.

Cheong YC. The effect of postoperative abdominal adhesion prevention strategies: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;35(4):343-58.

Randoll UG. Biological rhythms and tissue repair: fundamentals of matrix rhythm therapy. J Biomed Sci Engin. 2016;9(4):251-8.

Heinemann S. Frequency-specific micro-movements for tissue regeneration. Frontiers Physiol. 2017;8:685.

Threlkeld AJ. The effects of manual therapy on adhesion formation. J Orthop Sports Physical Ther. 2006;36(2):71-7.

Laudicina L. Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) and its implications in adhesion management. J Bodywork Mov Thera. 2019;23(4):625-33.

Langevin HM, Huijing PA. Tissue mechanics in manual and movement therapy. J Bodywork Mov Therap. 2009;13(3):275-84.

Kjaer M. Extracellular matrix adaptation in tendon and skeletal muscle to mechanical loading. Physiological Rev. 2019;99(4):1913-1950.

Yan Z. Role of fibroblasts in extracellular matrix dynamics and adhesion formation. Matrix Biol. 2020;85:17-29.

Burnett AL. Microvascular dynamics and therapeutic interventions in chronic inflammation. Am J Physiol. 2021;311(5):829-40.

Trewartha G. MRT as an adjunct for post-surgical recovery: A systematic review. Sports Med. 2018;48(1):79-93.

Martínez-Pérez R. Postoperative adhesions: A comprehensive review of current therapies. Euro J Obstetr Gynecol Rep Biol. 2022;269:23-32.

Thorborg K. Rehabilitation approaches for athletic injuries involving adhesions. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(16):1206-12.

Waseem M. Non-invasive therapies for musculoskeletal adhesions: A comparative review. Current Res Musculoskeletal Med. 2021;4(3):101-12.

Fassbender A. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy versus MRT in adhesion management. Euro J Physical Rehab Med. 2019;55(3):340-50.

van der Wal J. Ultrasound imaging and elastography for adhesion characterization. Clin Biomechanics. 2016;37:45-53.

Singh V. Assessing patient outcomes in Matrix Rhythm Therapy. J Rehab Med. 2020;52(3):217-24.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-25

How to Cite

Rizvi, A., Asthana, S., Naqvi, Z. A., & Fatima, T. (2025). The role of matrix rhythm therapy in managing and breaking tissue adhesions. International Journal of Research in Orthopaedics, 11(3), 671–674. https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20251157

Issue

Section

Review Articles