Comparison of surgical approaches of total hip arthroplasty in Crowe 3/4 dysplastic hips in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors

  • Zina Smadi School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
  • Sereen Halayqeh School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, United States of America
  • Yazeed E. Alhanbali School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
  • Arez R. Faraj School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
  • Omar M. Ismail School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
  • Bassem I. Haddad Department of Special Surgery, Division of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20250461

Keywords:

DDH, Dysplastic hip, Crowe III, Crowe IV, Total hip arthroplasty

Abstract

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) presents unique challenges for total hip arthroplasty (THA) due to altered anatomy, requiring tailored surgical approaches. Differences in outcomes such as Harris Hip Score (HHS), leg length discrepancy (LLD), operative variables, and postoperative complications between THA approaches remain unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate variations in functional outcomes, operative data, and postoperative complications among THA approaches in adult patients with DDH, focusing on direct anterior (DAA), posterolateral (PLA), and anterolateral (ALA) approaches, as well as osteotomy versus non-osteotomy techniques. Following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane, and manual sources for retrospective studies published until March 2024. An inverse variance pooling meta-analysis was conducted. Thirty-five studies (1501 hips; 1246 patients; mean age 46.9 years; mean follow-up 7 years) were included. HHS improved by 47.08 points with no significant differences between approaches (p=0.81) or osteotomy groups (p=0.96). LLD reduced by 3.50 cm overall, with the posterior approach achieving the greatest reduction (-3.67 cm, p=0.03). Operative time (148.47 minutes) and blood loss (832.74 ml) did not differ significantly between DAA and PLA (p=0.59 and p=0.08, respectively). Minor complications, including nerve palsy and non-union, were rare. Dislocation rates were higher with the posterior approach (2%, p=0.04), while infection rates were negligible (0%). THA approaches in DDH yield comparable functional and operative outcomes. The posterior approach achieved the greatest LLD reduction but had a higher risk of dislocation, highlighting the need for careful approach selection.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Guille JT, Pizzutillo PD, MacEwen GD. Development dysplasia of the hip from birth to six months. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000;8(4):232-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200007000-00004

Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S. Hip dysplasia: a significant risk factor for the development of hip osteoarthritis. A cross-sectional survey. Rheumatol (Oxf). 2005;44(2):211-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keh436

Dezateux C, Rosendahl K. Developmental dysplasia of the hip. Lancet. 2007;369:1541-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60710-7

Mei-Dan O, Welton KL, Kraeutler MJ, Young DA, Raju S, Garabekyan T. The CU PAO: A Minimally Invasive, 2-Incision, Interlocking Periacetabular Osteotomy: Technique and Early Results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019;101(16):1495-504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.19.00005

Mu W, Yang D, Xu B, Mamtimin A, Guo W, Cao L. Midterm Outcome of Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty in Crowe IV-Hartofilakidis Type III Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(3):668-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.10.011

Dhaliwal AS, Akhtar M, Razick DI, Afzali A, Wilson E, Nedopil AJ. Current Surgical Techniques in the Treatment of Adult Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip. J Pers Med. 2023;13(6):942. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13060942

Sanchez-Sotelo J, Berry DJ, Trousdale RT, Cabanela ME. Surgical treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip in adults: II. Arthroplasty options. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2002;10(5):334-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5435/00124635-200209000-00005

Chechik O, Khashan M, Lador R, Salai M, Amar E. Surgical approach and prosthesis fixation in hip arthroplasty world wide. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013;133(11):1595-600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-013-1828-0

Ollivier M, Abdel MP, Krych AJ, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ. Long-Term Results of Total Hip Arthroplasty With Shortening Subtrochanteric Osteotomy in Crowe IV Developmental Dysplasia. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(8):1756-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.049

Zeng WN, Liu JL, Wang FY, Zhang X, Fan HQ, Chen GX, et al. Total hip arthroplasty for patients with Crowe type IV developmental dysplasia of the hip: Ten years results. Int J Surg. 2017;42:17-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.04.029

Varacallo M, Luo TD, Johanson NA. Total Hip Arthroplasty Techniques. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. 2024.

Argenson JN, Flecher X, Parratte S, Aubaniac JM. Anatomy of the dysplastic hip and consequences for total hip arthro- plasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;465:40-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BLO.0b013e3181576052

Crowe JF, Mani VJ, Ranawat CS. Total hip replacement in congenital dislocation and dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61(1):15-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-197961010-00004

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1006-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Study Quality Assessment Tools. Available at: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools. Accessed on 12 December 2024.

Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Br Med J. 1997;315:629-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629

Peters JL, Sutton AJ, Jones DR, Abrams KR, Rushton L. Comparison of two methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. JAMA. 2006;295(6):676-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.6.676

Schwarzer G. General Package for Meta-Analysis [R package meta version 8.0-1]. Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/meta/index. html. Accessed on 12 December 2024.

Li F, Zhu L, Geng Y, Wang G. Effect of hip replacement surgery on clinical efficacy, VAS score and Harris hip score in patients with femoral head necrosis. Am J Transl Res. 2021;13(4):3851-5.

Cheng K, Zhu H, Peng Y, Yan H, Wen X, Cheng Z, et al. To further incorporate computer-aided designs to improve preoperative planning in total hip arthroplasty: a cohort study. Front Surg. 2024;11:1345261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1345261

Bei M, Xiao Y, Xu Y, Chen Y, Cao Q, Zhao C, et al. Enhanced Outcomes in Femoral Subtrochanteric Fractures Using Long INTERTAN Nails with Titanium Cable Cerclage: A Retrospective Analysis. Med Sci Monit. 2024;30:e944383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.944383

Wamper KE, Sierevelt IN, Poolman RW, Bhandari M, Haverkamp D. The Harris hip score: Do ceiling effects limit its usefulness in orthopedics? Acta Orthop. 2010;81(6):703-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2010.537808

Rose-Dulcina K, Gasparutto X, Djebara AE, Gauthier M, Zingg M, Lübbeke A, et al. Reliability of the Harris Hip limping sub-score in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2024;48(4):991-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-023-06082-4

Nilsdotter A, Bremander A. Measures of hip function and symptoms: Harris Hip Score (HHS), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Lequesne Index of Severity for Osteoarthritis of the Hip (LISOH), and American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) Hip and Knee Questionnaire. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011;63(11):S200-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.20549

Esmaeili S, Ghaseminejad-Raeini A, Ghane G, Soleimani M, Mortazavi SMJ, Shafiei SH. Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Who Have Crowe Type IV Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: A Systematic Review. J Arthroplasty. 2024;39(10):2645-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.05.031

Galea VP, Laaksonen I, Donahue GS, Fukui K, Kaneuji A, Malchau H, et al. Developmental Dysplasia Treated With Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty Utilizing High Hip Center Reconstruction: A Minimum 13-Year Follow-up Study. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(9):2899-905. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.04.037

Binazzi R. Two-Stage Progressive Femoral Lowering Followed by Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty for Treating Crowe IV-Hartofilakidis Type 3 Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(5):790-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2014.12.019

Liu Z, Bell CD, Ong AC, Zhang J, Li J, Zhang Y. Clinical evaluation of direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty for severe developmental dysplasia of the hip. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):8105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87543-x

Barrett WP, Turner SE, Leopold JP. Prospective randomized study of direct anterior vs postero-lateral approach for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28(9):1634-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.01.034

Jia F, Guo B, Xu F, Hou Y, Tang X, Huang L. A comparison of clinical, radiographic and surgical outcomes of total hip arthroplasty between direct anterior and posterior approaches: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hip Int. 2019;29(6):584-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1120700018820652

Pujol O, Soza D, Lara Y, Castellanos S, Hernández A, Barro V. Restoring hip biomechanics during the learning curve of a novice surgeon: Direct anterior approach vs posterior approach. J Orthop. 2021;26:72-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2021.07.014

Tassinari L, Di Martino A, Brunello M, Rossomando V, Traina F, Faldini C. Leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty performed by direct anterior approach: a systematic review comparing surgical approaches and strategies for prevention. EFORT Open Rev. 2024;9(8):733-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-23-0116

Dunn H, Rohlfing G, Kollmorgen R. A comparison of leg length discrepancy between direct anterior and anterolateral approaches in total hip arthroplasty. Arthroplasty. 2020;2(1):30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-020-00051-7

Biçici V, Bingöl I, Sazak T. Mid-term results of total hip arthroplasty with subtrochanteric Z-osteotomy in Crowe type 3-4 developmental hip dysplasia. Turk J Med Sci. 2021;51(4):1976-83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-2102-217

Ma HY, Lu Q, Sun JY, Du YQ, Shen JM, Gao ZS, et al. One-Stage Total Hip Arthroplasty with Modular S-ROM Stem for Patients with Bilateral Crowe Type IV Developmental Dysplasia. Orthop Surg. 2020;12(6):1913-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12843

Cheng TE, Wallis JA, Taylor NF, Holden CT, Marks P, Smith CL, et al. A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial in Total Hip Arthroplasty-Comparing Early Results Between the Direct Anterior Approach and the Posterior Approach. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(3):883-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.08.027

Peng L, Zeng Y, Wu Y, Zeng J, Liu Y, Shen B. Clinical, functional and radiographic outcomes of primary total hip arthroplasty between direct anterior approach and posterior approach: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03318-x

Fagotti L, Falotico GG, Maranho DA, Ayeni OR, Ejnisman B, Cohen M, et al. Posterior versus anterior approach to total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Acta Ortop Bras. 2021;29(6):297-303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220212906244610

Li L, Yu M, Yang C, Gu G. Total hip arthroplasty (S-ROM stem) and subtrochanteric osteotomy for Crowe type IV developmental dysplasia of the hip. Indian J Orthop. 2016;50(2):195-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.177575

Petis S, Howard JL, Lanting BL, Vasarhelyi EM. Surgical approach in primary total hip arthroplasty: anatomy, technique and clinical outcomes. Can J Surg. 2015;58(2):128-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.007214

Slaven SE, Ho H, Sershon RA, Fricka KB, Hamilton WG. Motor Nerve Palsy After Direct Anterior Versus Posterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Recovery. J Arthroplasty. 2023;38(7S):S242-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2023.03.086

Farrell CM, Springer BD, Haidukewych GJ, Morrey BF. Motor nerve palsy following primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(12):2619-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.C.01564

Yang TC, Chen CF, Tsai SW, Chen WM, Chang MC. Does restoration of hip center with subtrochanteric osteotomy provide preferable outcome for Crowe type III-IV irreducible development dysplasia of the hip?? J Chin Med Assoc. 2017;80(12):803-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcma.2017.06.006

Krych AJ, Howard JL, Trousdale RT, Cabanela ME, Berry DJ. Total hip arthroplasty with shortening subtrochanteric osteotomy in Crowe type-IV developmental dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(9):2213-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.01024

Sofu H, Kockara N, Gursu S, Issin A, Oner A, Sahin V. Transverse Subtrochanteric Shortening Osteotomy During Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty in Crowe Type-III or IV Developmental Dysplasia. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30(6):1019-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.01.045

Liu ZY, Zhang J, Wu ST, Li ZQ, Xu ZH, Zhang X, et al. Direct Anterior Approach in Crowe Type III-IV Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip: Surgical Technique and 2 years Follow-up from Southwest China. Orthop Surg. 2020;12(4):1140-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12713

Imbuldeniya AM, Walter WL, Zicat BA, Walter WK. Cementless total hip replacement without femoral osteotomy in patients with severe developmental dysplasia of the hip: minimum 15-year clinical and radiological results. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(11):1449-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.96B11.33698

Hasegawa Y, Iwase T, Kanoh T, Seki T, Matsuoka A. Total hip arthroplasty for Crowe type Ⅳ developmental dysplasia. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(9):1629-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2012.02.026

Liu T, Wang S, Huang G, Wang W. Treatment of Crowe IV developmental dysplasia of the hip with cementless total hip arthroplasty and shortening subtrochanteric osteotomy. J Int Med Res. 2019;47(7):3223-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060519853383

Sofu H, S Ahin V, Gürsu S, Yildirim T, Issin A, Koçkara N. Cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients with Crowe type-4 developmental dysplasia. Hip Int. 2013;23(5):472-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5301/hipint.5000047

Viamont-Guerra MR, Chen AF, Stirling P, Nover L, Guimarães RP, Laude F. The Direct Anterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty for Severe Dysplasia (Crowe III and IV) Provides Satisfactory Medium to Long-Term Outcomes. J Arthroplasty. 2020;35(6):1642-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.01.022

Sheth D, Cafri G, Inacio MC, Paxton EW, Namba RS. Anterior and Anterolateral Approaches for THA Are Associated With Lower Dislocation Risk Without Higher Revision Risk. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(11):3401-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4230-0

Tsukada S, Wakui M. Lower Dislocation Rate Following Total Hip Arthroplasty via Direct Anterior Approach than via Posterior Approach: Five-Year-Average Follow-Up Results. Open Orthop J. 2015;9:157-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325001509010157

Goldstein WM, Gleason TF, Kopplin M, Branson JJ. Prevalence of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty through a posterolateral approach with partial capsulotomy and capsulorrhaphy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83-A:2-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200100021-00002

White RE, Jr, Forness TJ, Allman JK, Junick DW. Effect of posterior capsular repair on early dislocation in primary total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;393:163-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200112000-00019

Sierra RJ, Raposo JM, Trousdale RT, Cabanela ME. Dislocation of primary THA done through a posterolateral approach in the elderly. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;441:262-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000194308.23105.f4

Ang JJM, Onggo JR, Stokes CM, Ambikaipalan A. Comparing direct anterior approach versus posterior approach or lateral approach in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023;33(7):2773-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-023-03528-8

Wang Z, Hou JZ, Wu CH, Zhou YJ, Gu XM, Wang HH, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of direct anterior approach versus posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018;13(1):229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0929-4

Nambiar M, Cheng TE, Onggo JR, Maingard J, Troupis J, Pope A, et al. No Difference in Functional, Radiographic, and Survivorship Outcomes Between Direct Anterior or Posterior Approach THA: 5-Year Results of a Randomized Trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021;479(12):2621-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001855

Higgins BT, Barlow DR, Heagerty NE, Lin TJ. Anterior vs. posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty, a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30:419-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2014.10.020

Malek IA, Royce G, Bhatti SU. A comparison between the direct anterior and posterior approaches for total hip arthroplasty: the role of an 'Enhanced Recovery' pathway. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B(6):754-60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.98B6.36608

Downloads

Published

2025-02-25

How to Cite

Smadi, Z., Halayqeh, S., Alhanbali, Y. E., Faraj, A. R., Ismail, O. M., & Haddad, B. I. (2025). Comparison of surgical approaches of total hip arthroplasty in Crowe 3/4 dysplastic hips in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis . International Journal of Research in Orthopaedics, 11(2), 368–380. https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20250461

Issue

Section

Meta-Analysis