Functional outcome of displaced clavicle fractures treated with locking compression plate
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20250345Keywords:
Clavicle fractures, Locking compression plates, Open reduction internal fixationAbstract
Clavicle fractures, common in young, active individuals, often occur due to trauma or repetitive stress and account for about 2.6% to 5% of all fractures. These fractures typically happen in the midshaft and are often displaced. Historically, they were treated conservatively, but this approach often led to malunion and poor shoulder function. Recent studies show that surgical interventions, particularly with locking compression plates (LCP), improve healing, shoulder function, and reduce complications like non-union and malunion. Surgical treatments, such as open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) or closed reduction internal fixation (CRIF), are especially beneficial for displaced fractures or those with additional complications. LCPs provide better stability, especially in osteoporotic patients, although potential complications include screw loosening and infection. Overall, evidence supports surgical treatment with LCPs for better functional outcomes and fewer complications compared to nonoperative methods. This study is being done to assess functional outcome of clavicle fractures managed with open reduction with LCP. A prospective interventional study was conducted to assess functional outcome of clavicle fractures managed with ORIF with LCP. Constant-Murley score was evaluated before the treatment and were repeated after 6 weeks (T1), 12 weeks (T2) and 24 weeks (T3). The study involved 30 participants with an average age of 31.23 years, consisting of 80% males and 20% females. Of these, 53% had right-sided clavicular fractures, and 47% had left-sided fractures. Most surgeries were performed within 2-3 days of admission, with 93.33% of fractures showing union within 12 weeks. The constant Murley’s score, which measures functional outcomes, improved significantly over time: from 5.28 before surgery to 91.09 after 24 weeks. The functional outcome was graded excellent in 90% of patients. Statistical analysis showed significant improvement in scores post-surgery (p<0.001). Age had a weak positive correlation with better outcomes, while time from admission to surgery and time to union had strong negative correlations with functional outcomes. These findings suggest that faster surgery and quicker union lead to better functional recovery, and age has a slight impact on outcomes.
Metrics
References
Kariya AD, Jain PA, Patond K. Middle third clavicular fractures fixed with precontoured locking compression plate or reconstruction plate: comparison of outcomes and complications. Curr Orthop Pract. 2019;30(3):257-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BCO.0000000000000740
Reisch T, Camenzind RS, Fuhrer R, Riede U, Helmy N. The first 100 patients treated with a new anatomical pre-contoured locking plate for clavicular midshaft fractures. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord. 2019;20(1):4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2396-9
Altamimi SA, McKee MD, Canadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society. Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(2 Pt 1):1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.01336
Vander Have KL, Perdue AM, Caird MS, Farley FA. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures in adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop. 2010;30(4):307-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181db3227
Golish SR, Oliviero JA, Francke EI, Miller MD. A biomechanical study of plate versus intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixation. J Orthop Surg Res. 2008;3(1):28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-3-28
Wang XH, Guo WJ, Li AB, Cheng GJ, Lei T, Zhao YM. Operative versus nonoperative treatment for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures: a meta-analysis based on current evidence. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2015;70(8):584-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2015(08)09
Siebenlist S, Sandmann G, Kirchhoff C, Biberthaler P, Neumaier M. Anatomically precontoured LCP for delayed union of a medial third clavicle fracture. Case report with review of the literature. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2013;80(6):407-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55095/achot2013/069
Wagner M. General principles for the clinical use of the LCP. Injury. 2003;34(2):B31-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2003.09.023
Vrotsou K, Ávila M, Machón M, Mateo-Abad M, Pardo Y, Garin O, et al. Constant-Murley Score: systematic review and standardized evaluation in different shoulder pathologies. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(9):2217-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1875-7
Court-Brown C, Heckman JD, McKee M, McQueen MM, Ricci W, III PT. Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in Adults. 8th ed. Vol. 1. Wolters Kluwer Health. 2014;6058.
Bentley TP, Hosseinzadeh S. Clavicle Fractures. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. 2024.
Fu B. Minimally invasive intramedullary nailing of clavicular fractures by a new titanium elastic nail. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016;50(5):494-500. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aott.2016.08.008
Mishra PK, Gupta A, Gaur SC. Midshaft Clavicular Fracture and Titanium Elastic Intra-Medullary Nail. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(1):129-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2014/6757.3896
Miller DL, Goswami T. A review of locking compression plate biomechanics and their advantages as internal fixators in fracture healing. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2007;22(10):1049-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.08.004
Song HS, Kim H. Current concepts in the treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures in adults. Clin Shoulder Elb. 2021;24(3):18-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5397/cise.2021.00388
McKee MD, Pedersen EM, Jones C, Stephen DJG, Kreder HJ, Schemitsch EH, et al. Deficits following nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(1):35-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200601000-00005
Bajuri MY, Maidin S, Rauf A, Baharuddin M, Harjeet S. Functional outcomes of conservatively treated clavicle fractures. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2011;66(4):635-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322011000400019