A comparative study of intramedullary nailing versus minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis for extra articular distal tibia fracture

Rahil T. Pasha; Prakash A. Sasnur; Moinuddin Basha K.; Syed Hasan Zahid

doi:10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20243902

Authors

Rahil T. Pasha Department of Orthopaedics, Al-Ameen Medical College, Vijayapura, Karnataka, India
Prakash A. Sasnur Department of Orthopaedics, Al-Ameen Medical College, Vijayapura, Karnataka, India
Moinuddin Basha K. Department of Orthopaedics, Hassan Institute of Medical Sciences, Hassan, Karnataka, India
Syed Hasan Zahid Department of Orthopaedics, Al-Ameen Medical College, Vijayapura, Karnataka, India https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0316-3307

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20243902

Keywords:

Distal tibia fracture, Intramedullary nailing, MIPPO, Fracture union

Abstract

Background: Distal tibia fractures are among the most challenging orthopaedic injuries due to their subcutaneous location, limited blood supply and proximity to the ankle joint. These fractures often result in complications such as delayed-union, non-union, wound infection and malalignment. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of two minimally invasive surgical methods: Intramedullary Nailing (IMN) and Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis (MIPPO) in treating extra- articular distal tibia fractures.

Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 30 patients with extra-articular distal tibia fractures. The participants were divided into two groups, 15 patients receiving IMN and 15 patients MIPPO. Clinical assessments were carried out to evaluate functional outcomes, union time and complications. Radiological evaluations were used to monitor the progress of fracture healing.

Results: Both IMN and MIPPO were effective in treating distal tibia fractures, with each technique having its advantages and drawbacks. IMN showed a shorter union time and fewer wound complications compared to MIPPO, which demonstrated better alignment and fewer malunions. However, IMN was associated with a higher incidence of anterior knee pain, whereas MIPPO had more cases of implant irritation leading to reoperation.

Conclusions: Both IMN and MIPPO offer viable treatment options for extra-articular distal tibia fractures. IMN is preferred in cases where early weight-bearing and faster union are critical, particularly in patients with soft tissue concerns. Conversely, MIPPO is advantageous in achieving better alignment and should be considered when soft tissue conditions allow. We conclude by Intramedullary Nailing as better treatment modality for distal tibia extra articular fractures.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Rockwood and Greens fractures in adults, seventh edition, 2010, 1.

Gray's Anatomy. 40th Edition, The anatomical basis of clinical practice. 2008.

Bucholz R, Court-Brown C, Rockwood C. Rockwood and Green's Fractures in Adults. New York: Lippincott. 2015: 98.

Farouk O, Krettek C, Miclau T, Schandelmaier P, Guy P, Tscherne H. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and vascularity: preliminary results of a cadaver injection study. Injury. 1997;28(1):7-12.

Behgoo SA, Gharati H, Ramezan Shirazi M. Assessment of the treatment outcome of closed extra-articular distal tibia fracture: IM nailing vs plating. Med J Islamic Republic Iran. 2009;23(3):127-31.

Court-Brown CM. Fractures of the Tibia and Fibula. In: Court-Brown CM, editor(s). Rockwood and Green's fractures in adults. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. 2006.

Newman SD, Mauffrey CP, Krikler S. Distal metadiaphyseal tibial fractures. Injury. 2011;42(10):975- 84.

Nork SE, Schwartz AK, Agel J, Holt SK, Schrick JL, Winquist RA. Intramedullary nailing of distal metaphyseal tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(6):1213-21.

Wang Z, Cheng Y, Xin D. Expert Tibial nails for treating distal Tibial fractures with soft tissue damage: a patient series. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2017;56:1232–5.

Levin PE. Intramedullary nailing of periarticular fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2013;27:125.

Triantafillou K, Barcak E, Villarreal A, Collinge C, Perez E. Proper distal placement of Tibial nail improves rate of malalignment for distal tibia fractures. J Orthop Trauma, 2017;31:e407–e411.

Pairon P, Ossendorf C, Kuhn S, Hofmann A, Rommens PM. Intramedullary nailing after external fixation of the femur and tibia: a review of advantages and limits. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg, 2015;41:25–38.

Piatkowski K, Piekarczyk P, Kwiatkowski K, Przybycien M, Chwedczuk B. Comparison of different locking plate fixation methods in distal tibia fractures. Int Orthop. 2015;39:2245–51.

He X, Hu C, Zhou K, Zhai Q, Wen W, Pan F. Clinical and radiological outcome of Gustilo type III open distal tibial and tibial shaft fractures after staged treatment with posterolateral minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018;138:1097–102.

Devkota P, Khan JA, Shrestha SK. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for distal tibial fractures. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2014;22:299–303.

Ehlinger M, Adam P, Bonnomet F. Minimally invasive locking screw plate fixation of non-articular proximal and distal tibia fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010;96:800–9.

Ali N, Firdous BA, Bangroo A, Muzzafar K, Bhat SA. "Treatment of extra-articular distal tibial fractures: minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis versus intramedullary nailing". Trauma Monthly. 2017;4:22.