Fixing of intertrochanteric fractures with proximal femoral nail antirotation 2 by a double incision technique: a retrospective analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20243417Keywords:
Intertrochanteric fractures, PFNA2, Double incision, Entry precisionAbstract
Background: The incidence of hip fractures is projected to rise from 1.66 million in 1990 to 6.26 million by 2050. Internal fixation is the most prevalent surgical intervention for intertrochanteric fractures. Hip fractures represent a significant healthcare issue amongst the elderly. The aim of this study is to evaluate a double incision technique in comparison to the conventional incision for fixing intertrochanteric fractures using the standard proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA2).
Methods: This study took place at Dr. D. Y. Patil hospital in Navi Mumbai, India, from May 2023 to May 2024 employing an open-label, retrospective, randomized, and comparative methodology. A total of 100 patients with proven radiographic intertrochanteric fracture having undergone fixation with PFNA2 were analysed, with 50 undergoing the double incision and 50 serving as the stand control group.
Results: The minimally invasive technique with a modified incision using the standard proximal femoral nail A2 can reduce bleeding, enhance precision for the entry point of the guidewire, shorten the time required for the entry, decrease soft tissue injuries, and provide better aesthetic outcomes.
Conclusions: The current study delineates a minimally invasive surgical technique employing a double incision for the fixation of intertrochanteric fractures using the proximal femoral nail A2, underscoring its benefits.
References
Veronese N, Maggi S. Epidemiology and social costs of hip fracture. Injury. 2018;49(8):1458-60.
Michael Lewiecki E, Wright NC, Curtis JR, Siris E, Gagel RF, Saag KG, et al. Hip fracture trends in the United States, 2002 to 2015. Osteoporos Int. 2018;29(3):717-22.
Broderick JM, Bruce-Brand R, Stanley E, Mulhall KJ. Osteoporotic hip fractures: the burden of fixation failure. Scientific World J. 2013;2013:515197.
Kashid MR, Gogia T, Prabhakara A, Jafri MA, Shaktawat DS, Shinde G. Comparative study between proximal femoral nail and proximal femoral nail antirotation in management of unstable trochanteric fractures. Int J Res Orthop. 2016;2:354-8.
Shivashankar B, Keshkar S. Intertrochanteric Fractures: Ten Commandments for How to Get Good Results with Proximal Femoral Nailing. JOIO. 2021;55:521-4.
Seyhan M, Turkmen I, Unay K, Ozkut AT. Do PFNA devices and Intertan nails both have the same effects in the treatment of trochanteric fractures? A prospective clinical study. J Orthop Sci. 2015;20:1053-61.
Sawaguchi T, Sakagoshi D, Shima Y, Ito T, Goldhahn S. Do design adaptations of a trochanteric nail make sense for Asian patients? Results of a multicenter study of the PFNA-II in Japan. Injury. 2014;45:1624-31.
Radaideh AM, Qudah HA, Audat ZA, Jahmani RA, Yousef IR, Saleh AAA. Functional and radiological results of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) osteosynthesis in the treatment of unstable pertrochanteric fractures. J Clin Med. 2018;7(4):78.
Streubel PN, Wong AH, Ricci WM, Gardner MJ. Is there a standard trochanteric entry site for nailing of subtrochanteric femur fractures? J Orthop Trauma. 2011;25(4):202-7.
Pan S, Liu X-H, Feng T, Hui-Jun K, Zhi-Guang T, Chun-Guang L. Influence of different great trochanteric entry points on the outcome of intertrochanteric fractures: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2017;18(1):107.
