A comparative study of anatomical plate fixation versus intramedullary nailing of middle-third clavicle fractures in Al-ameen medical college hospital

Authors

  • Syed Hasan Zahid Department of Orthopaedics, Al-Ameen Medical College, Vijayapura, Karnataka, India https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0316-3307
  • Preetish Endigeri Department of Orthopaedics, Al-Ameen Medical College, Vijayapura, Karnataka, India
  • Rahil T. Pasha Department of Orthopaedics, Al-Ameen Medical College, Vijayapura, Karnataka, India
  • Riyaz Bagawan Department of Orthopaedics, Al-Ameen Medical College, Vijayapura, Karnataka, India https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0750-917X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20243894

Keywords:

Clavicle, Fracture fixation, Intramedullary, Titanium, Plating

Abstract

Background: Clavicle fractures constitute 5% of adult fractures. About 80% involve the midshaft, with more than 70% displaced. Many plate and intramedullary fixation systems have been used. However, the best fixation method is still debated. Surgery includes ORIF with Anatomical Plate and CRIF with TENS. Each technique has its own advantages and disadvantages.

Methods: 40 patients with displaced middle-third clavicle fractures were prospectively randomly assigned to two groups, Group-A (plating group) and Group-B (nailing group), with an equal number of 20 patients in each. The outcomes were evaluated based on Union-time, Complications, Visual-Analog-Scale for pain. The assessment of shoulder function was conducted using the DASH score.

Results: 9 (45%) of Group A patients achieved union in 6-7 months and 11 (55%) in 8 months, mean union time being 7.5 months. 4 (20%) had implant prominence, 3 (15%) had hypertrophic scar, 1 (5%) had plate-end protrusion post-union, and 2 (10%) had surgical site infection managed by intravenous antibiotics. In group B, 16 (80%) patients achieved union by 6-7 months and 4 (20%) by 8 months, mean union-time being 7.1 months. 3 (15%) patients had nail-end prominence, 3 (15%) had nail-end irritation by 4 months, one (5%) had nail-end protrusion by 6 months, and one (5%) had medial migration by 8 months. No surgical site infection occurred.

Conclusion: Plating provides firm fixation, greater rotational stability for displaced middle-third clavicular fractures. Complications with plating like scarring, implant prominence, irritation are significantly lesser in nailing. Both fixations provide good functional outcome.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Shah VM, Routatal RV. Structure of Clavicle In Relation to Weight Transmission. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(7):1-4.

Kotelnicki JJ, Bote HO, Mitts KG. The management of clavicle fractures. JAAPA. 2006;19(9):50, 53-6.

[3] Lenza M, Buchbinder R, Johnston RV, Ferrari BA, Faloppa F. Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating fractures of the middle third of the clavicle. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;1(1):9363.

Smekal V, Irenberger A, Struve P, Wambacher M, Krappinger D, Kralinger FS. Elastic stable intramedullary nailing versus nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures-a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. J Orthop Trauma. 2009;23:106–12.

Kabak S, Halici M, Tuncel M, Avsarogullari L, Karaoglu S. Treatment of mid-clavicular non-union: comparison of dynamic compression plating and low-contact dynamic compression plating techniques. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004; 13:396-403.

Shen JW, Tong PJ, Qu HB. A three-dimensional reconstruction plate for displaced midshaft fractures of the clavicle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90(11):1495-8.

Lee YS, Lin CC, Huang CR, Chen CN, Liao WY. Operative treatment of midclavicular fractures in 62 elderly patients: Knowles pin versus plate. Orthop. 2007;30(11):959-64.

Mudd CD, Quigley KJ, Gross LB. Excessive complications of open intramedullary nailing of midshaft clavicle fractures with the Rockwood clavicle pin. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(12):3364-70. /

Mueller M, Rangger C, Striepens N, Burger C. Minimally invasive intramedullary nailing of midshaft clavicular fractures using titanium elastic nails. J Trauma. 2008;64(6):1528-34.

Smekal V, Oberladstaetter J, Struve P, Krappinger D. Shaft fractures of the clavicle: current concepts. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009;29:807-15.

Ju W, Mohamed SO, Qi B. Comparison of plate fixation vs. intramedullary fixation for the management of mid-shaft clavicle fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Exp Ther Med. 2020;20(3):2783-93.

Hsu JE, Hulet DA, McDonald C, Whitson A, Russ SM, Matsen FA. The contribution of the scapula to active shoulder motion and self-assessed function in three hundred and fifty-two patients prior to elective shoulder surgery. Int Orthop. 2018;42(11):2645-51.

Okwumabua E, Thompson JH. StatPearls Publishing; Treasure Island (FL): Anatomy, shoulder and upper limb, axillary nerve. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Accessedv on 12 Augus 20204.

Robinson CM. Fractures of the clavicle in the adult Epidemiology and classification. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80:476–84.

Nordqvist A, Petersson C. The incidence of fractures of the clavicle. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;300:127–32.

Nordqvist A, Petersson CJ, Redlund-Johnell I. Mid-clavicle fractures in adults: end result study after conservative treatment. J Orthop Trauma. 1998;12(8):572–6.

Grassi FA, Tajana MS, D'Angelo F. Management of midclavicular fractures: comparison between nonoperative treatment and open intramedullary fixation in 80 patients. J Trauma. 2001;50(6):1096–100.

Neer CS., 2nd Nonunion of the clavicle. J Am Med Assoc. 1960;172:1006–11.

Rowe CR. An atlas of anatomy and treatment of midclavicular fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1968;58:29–42.

Altamimi SA, McKee MD. Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(2):1–8.

Golish SR, Oliviero JA, Francke EI, Miller MD. A biomechanical study of plate versus intramedullary devices for midshaft clavicle fixation. J Orthop Surg Res. 2008;3:28.

Bostman O, Manninen M, Pihlajamaki H. Complications of plate fixation in fresh displaced midclavicular fractures. J Trauma. 1997;43(5):778–83.

Kuner EH, Schlickewei W, Mydla F. Surgical therapy of clavicular fractures, indications, technic, results. Hefte Unfallheilkd. 1982;160:76–83.

Liu PC, Chien SH, Chen JC, Hsieh CH, Chou PH, Lu CC. Minimally invasive fixation of displaced midclavicular fractures with titanium elastic nails. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24(4):217–23.

Jubel A, Andermahr J, Schiffer G, Tsironis K, Rehm KE. Elastic stable intramedullary nailing of midclavicular fractures with a titanium nail. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;(408):279–85.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-26

How to Cite

Zahid, S. H., Endigeri, P., Pasha, R. T., & Bagawan, R. (2024). A comparative study of anatomical plate fixation versus intramedullary nailing of middle-third clavicle fractures in Al-ameen medical college hospital . International Journal of Research in Orthopaedics, 11(1), 105–111. https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20243894

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles