Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using peroneus longus tendon auto-graft: functional results

Authors

  • Ahmed Refaat Khamis Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Benha, Qaliobia, Egypt
  • Mohamed Tarek Abdel Aziz Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Benha, Qaliobia, Egypt
  • Magdy Mohamed El Sayed Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Benha, Qaliobia, Egypt
  • Mohamed Ahmed Abdel Baky Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Benha, Qaliobia, Egypt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20243885

Keywords:

ACL, ACL reconstruction, IKDC score, AOFAS score, Peroneus longus

Abstract

Background: The peroneus longus tendon is a promising autograft alternative to the others tendons in ACL reconstruction. It offers the advantages of being expendable, having adequate length and strength, sparing morbidity from other donor sites, and allows early rehabilitation.

Methods:  The study was on 30 patients with isolated ACL complete tear treated by arthroscopic reconstruction using the PL tendon in Benha university hospital in the period from July 2022 till June 2023. The patients were assessed pre-operatively and post-operatively with the IKDC score and clinical tests of instability. The ankle was also assessed pre-operatively and post-operatively though AOFAS and clinical tests of instability. Patients were followed up for 12 months.

Results: The age of patients was 18-45 years. The preoperative IKDC score ranged 49-72 with a mean SD of±14.02. The post-operative IKDC score ranged 89-100 with a mean SD of±3.5 showing marked improvement of knee function with 93.3% of patients regained normal knee function. The pre-operative AOFAS score ranged 99-100 with a mean SD of±0.16 and the post-operative score ranged 89-100 with a mean SD of±3.5 denoting minimal affection of ankle functions.

Conclusions: The peroneus longus serves as a suitable autograft for ACL reconstruction as an alternative to the others tendons based on its ability to restore knee function and the minimal morbidity at the donor site.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Stone AV, Marx A, Conley CW. Management of partial tears of the anterior cruciate ligament: a review of the anatomy, diagnosis, and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021;29(2):60-70.

Bergerson E, Persson K, Svantesson E, Horvath A, Olsson WJ, Karlsson J, et al. Superior outcome of early ACL reconstruction versus initial non-reconstructive treatment with late crossover to surgery: a study from the Swedish national knee ligament registry. Am J Sports Med. 2022;50(4):896-903.

Zhao J, Huangfu X. The biomechanical and clinical application of using the anterior half of the peroneus longus tendon as an autograft source. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(3):662-71.

Rhatomy S, Hartoko L, Setyawan R, Soekarno NR. Single bundle ACL reconstruction with peroneus longus tendon graft: 2-years follow-up. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020;11:S332-6.

Diermeier TA, Rothrauff BB, Engebretsen L, Lynch A, Svantesson E, Senorski EAH, et al. Treatment after ACL injury: panther symposium ACL treatment consensus group. Brit J Sports Med. 2021;55(1):14-22.

Montalvo AM, Schneider DK, Webster KE, Yut L, Galloway MT, Heidt RS Jr, et al. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk in Sport: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Injury Incidence by Sex and Sport Classification. J Athletic Training. 2019;54(5):472-82.

Edwards PK, Ebert JR, Joss B, Ackland T, Annear P, Buelow JU, et al. Patient characteristics and predictors of return to sport at 12 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the importance of patient age and postoperative rehabilitation. Orthopaed J Sports Med. 2018;6(9):2325967118797575.

Ramkumar PN, Tariq MB, Spindler KP, Group MK. Risk Factors for Loss to Follow-Up in 3,202 Patients at Two Years after ACL Reconstruction: Implications for Identifying Health Disparities in the MOON Prospective Cohort Study. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47(13):3173.

Moses B. Orchard J, Orchard J. Systematic review: annual incidence of ACL injury and surgery in various populations. Res Sports Med. 2012;20(3-4):157-79.

Rhatomy S, Abadi MBT, Setyawan R, Asikin AIZ, Soekarno NR, Imelda LG, et al. Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with peroneus longus tendon versus hamstring tendon: a comparison of functional outcome and donor site morbidity. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthroscopy. 2021;29:1045-51.

Saeed UB, Ramzan A, Anwar M, Tariq H, Tariq H, Yasin A, et al. Earlier Return to Sports, Reduced Donor-Site Morbidity with Doubled Peroneus Longus Versus Quadrupled Hamstring Tendon Autograft in ACL Reconstruction. JBJS Open Access. 2023;8(4):e23.

Kerimoğlu S, Aynaci O, Saraçoğlu M, AydinH, Turhan AU. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the peroneus longus tendon. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2008;42(1):38-43.

Andrés-Cano P, Godino M, Vides M, Guerado E. Postoperative complications of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction after ambulatory surgery. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2015;59(3):157-64.

Waldron K, Brown M, Calderon A, Feldman M. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rehabilitation and Return to Sport: How Fast Is Too Fast? Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022;4(1):e175-9.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-26

How to Cite

Khamis, A. R., Aziz, M. T. A., El Sayed, M. M., & Baky, M. A. A. (2024). Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using peroneus longus tendon auto-graft: functional results. International Journal of Research in Orthopaedics, 11(1), 30–34. https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20243885

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles