Comparing the subvastus and medial parapatellar approaches in total knee replacement

Authors

  • M. B. Lingayat Department of Orthopaedics, GMCH, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India
  • Vimal P. V. Department of Orthopaedics, GMCH, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India
  • Raj Nawkhare Department of Orthopaedics, GMCH, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India
  • Ramkripal Sharma Department of Orthopaedics, GMCH, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India
  • Shubham Lakde Department of Orthopaedics, GMCH, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India
  • Omkar K. Rashinkar Department of Orthopaedics, GMCH, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20243126

Keywords:

Total knee replacement, Subvastus approach, Medial parapatellar approach, Postoperative recovery, Knee surgery outcomes

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of the subvastus and medial parapatellar approaches in total knee replacement (TKR), focusing on postoperative pain, knee function recovery, quadriceps strength, hospital stay, complications, and patient satisfaction.

Methods: This prospective comparative clinical trial was conducted over 18 months at a tertiary care hospital. A total of 120 patients, aged 50-75 years with knee osteoarthritis, were divided into two groups, group A (subvastus approach) and group B (medial parapatellar approach). Pain, range of motion (ROM), quadriceps strength, length of hospital stay, complications, and patient satisfaction were evaluated postoperatively at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Data were analyzed using SPSS, with significance set at p<0.05.

Results: Group A showed significantly lower pain at 1 and 3 months, with VAS scores of 4.1 and 2.8, respectively (p<0.05). ROM was significantly greater in Group A at 1 and 3 months (105.2° and 120.8°, p<0.05). Quadriceps strength improved faster in group A at 3 months (MMT score: 4.0, p=0.04). Group A also had a shorter hospital stay (4.5 vs 5.8 days, p=0.01). Complications and long-term satisfaction were similar across both groups.

Conclusion: The subvastus approach offers advantages in early recovery, including reduced pain, quicker ROM recovery, and shorter hospital stays. However, long-term outcomes are comparable between both approaches.

References

Khan MN, Abbas K, Faraz A, Ilyas MW, Shafique H, Jamshed M, et al. Total knee replacement: A comparison of the subvastus and medial parapatellar approaches. Ann Med Surg. 2021;68:102670.

Hay G, Kampshoff J, Kuster M. Lateral subvastus approach with osteotomy of the tibial tubercle for total knee replacement: A two-year prospective, randomised, blinded controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92(6):862-6.

Liu HW, Gu W, Xu NW, Sun JY. Surgical approaches in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis comparing the midvastus and subvastus to the medial peripatellar approach. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(12):2298-304.

Aslam M, Sabir A, Tiwari V, Abbas S, Tiwari A, Singh P. Approach to total knee replacement: a randomized double-blind study between medial parapatellar and midvastus approach in the early postoperative period in Asian population. J Knee Surg. 2017;30(8):793-7.

Cila E, Güzel V, Özalay M, Tan J, Şimşek A, Kanatlı U. Subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2002;122(2):65-8.

Dutka J, Skowronek M, Sosin P, Skowronek P. Subvastus and medial parapatellar approaches in TKA: comparison of functional results. Orthopedics. 2011;34(6):148.

Koh I, Kim MW, Kim M, Jang S, Park D, In Y. The patient's perception does not differ following subvastus and medial parapatellar approaches in total knee arthroplasty: a simultaneous bilateral randomized study. J Arthroplasty. 2016;31(1):112-7.

Dileep P, Padmanabhan V, Krishnaraj C. Subvastus approach versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty: A prospective comparative study of functional outcome. J Orthop Assoc South Indian States. 2022;19(1):2-6.

Teng YJ, Du W, Jiang J, Gao X, Pan S, Wang J, et al. Subvastus versus medial parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty: meta-analysis. Orthopedics. 2012;35:12.

Blom A, Hunt L, Matharu G, Reed M, Whitehouse M. The effect of surgical approach in total knee replacement on outcomes. An analysis of 875,166 elective operations from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man. Knee. 2021;31:144-57.

Bourke M, Jull G, Buttrum PJ, Fitzpatrick P, Dalton P, Russell T. Comparing outcomes of medial parapatellar and subvastus approaches in total knee arthroplasty: A randomized controlled trial. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27(3):347-53.

Roysam GS, Oakley M. Subvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, and observer-blinded trial. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16(4):454-7.

Wu Y, Zeng Y, Bao XC, Xiong H, Hu Q, Li M, et al. Comparison of mini-subvastus approach versus medial parapatellar approach in primary total knee arthroplasty. Int J Surg. 2018;57:15-21.

Sidhu S, Moslemian A, Yamomo G, Vakili S, Kelly P, Willing R, et al. Lateral subvastus lateralis versus medial parapatellar approach for total knee arthroplasty: A cadaveric biomechanical study. Knee. 2020;27(6):1735-45.

Ugbeye M, Itakpe S, Ayodabo O. Subvastus versus Medial Parapatellar Approach in Primary Total Knee Replacement: An Assessment of Early Function. West Afr J Med. 2018;35(1):15-9.

Jung Y, Song K, Lee EY, Lee Y, Park YU. A Comparison of Modified Subvastus and Medial Parapatellar Approach in Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2005;40(3):279-83.

Anand A, Veerappa YA, Dilip N, Ravindran R, Adala R, Srinivas J. Surgical exposure in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In: Surgery for Knee Arthritis. 2015. p. 123-34.

Berstock J, Blom A, Beswick A. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing the subvastus and medial parapatellar approaches to total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2015;7-7.

Sidhu S, Broberg J, Willing R, Teeter M, Lanting B. Lateral Subvastus Lateralis versus Medial Parapatellar Approach for Total Knee Arthroplasty: Patient Outcomes and Kinematics Analysis. J Knee Surg. 2024;37(7):523-9.

Zhu B, Zhang D, Sang M, Zhao L, Wang C, Xu Y. Establishment and evaluation of a predictive model for length of hospital stay after total knee arthroplasty: A single-center retrospective study in China. Front Surg. 2023;10:1102371

Giannotti S, Crippa Orlandi N, Troiano E, Cacioppo M, Giacché T, Greco T, Perisano C, Mondanelli N. Medial Ball-in-Socket Posterior Cruciate-Sacrificing Total Knee Arthroplasty: Clinical, Functional and Radiographic Evaluation of 100 Consecutive Implants. Prosthesis. 2023;5(4):1275-86.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-25

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles