Can tip-apex distance and calcar reference tip-apex distance predict lag screw cut-out in elderly patients with trochanteric femoral fractures treated with gamma3 nails

Chonlathan Iamsum-Ang; Chinakrit Chensupakarn; Supinya Wannachotphawet

doi:10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20243106

Authors

Chonlathan Iamsum-Ang Department of Orthopedic, Lampang Hospital, Lampang, Thailand https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9952-8486
Chinakrit Chensupakarn Department of Orthopedic, Lampang Hospital, Lampang, Thailand https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0635-521X
Supinya Wannachotphawet Department of Orthopedic, Lampang Hospital, Lampang, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20243106

Keywords:

CalTAD, Gamma3 nail, Lag screw cut-out, TAD, Trochanteric femoral fractures

Abstract

Background: The most common complication of cephalomedullary nail fixation for femoral fractures is lag screw cut-out. The significance of the tip-apex distance (TAD) in predicting lag screw cut-out is still debated. There has been no study conducted on the calcar reference tip-apex distance (CalTAD) regarding its impact on lag screw cut-out. To compare the average TAD and CalTAD between groups with and without lag screw cut-out and to determine the TAD and CalTAD values associated with the highest risk of lag screw cut-out.

Methods: This was a prognostic prediction study utilizing a retrospective cohort of 756 patients with trochanteric femoral fractures treated with Gamma3 nails. This study compared the differences in TAD and CalTAD values between the two groups.

Results: The group without lag screw cut-out had lower TAD and CalTAD values compared to the group with lag screw cut-out (TAD; 20.3±5.3 mm vs. 22.1±5.7 mm; p=0.044); (CalTAD 22.3±4.4 mm vs. 25.2±5.3 mm; p<0.001). The cutoff points of TAD >23 mm and CalTAD >25 mm were associated with the highest risk of lag screw cut-out (TAD: OR, 2.91; 95% CI, 1.47-5.77; p=0.002); (CalTAD: OR, 3.43; 95% CI, 1.73-6.80; p<0.001).

Conclusions: The lag screw cut-out group had higher TAD and CalTAD values. TAD values greater than 23 mm and CalTAD values greater than 25 mm were associated with the highest risk of lag screw cut-out.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Karl Phadungkiat S, Chariyalertsak S, Rajatanavin R, Chiengthong K, Suriyawongpaisal P, Woratanarat P. Incidence of hip fracture in Chiang Mai. J Med Assoc Thai. 2002;85(5):565-71.

Woratanarat P, Wajanavisit W, Lertbusayanukul C, Loahacharoensombat W, Ongphiphatanakul B. Cost analysis of osteoporotic hip fractures. J Med Assoc Thai. 2005;88(5):96-104.

Mnif H, Koubaa M, Zrig M, Trabelsi R, Abid A. Elderly patient’s mortality and morbidity following trochanteric fracture. A prospective study of 100 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009;95(7):505-10.

Chua ITH, Rajamoney GN, Kwek EBK. Cephalomedullary nail versus sliding hip screw for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2013;21(3):308-12.

Kim KH, Han KY, Kim KW, Lee JH, Chung MK. Local Postoperative Complications after Surgery for Intertrochanteric Fractures Using Cephalomedullary Nails. Hip Pelvis. 2018;30(3):168-74.

Bojan AJ, Beimel C, Speitling A, Taglang G, Ekholm C, Jönsson A. 3066 consecutive Gamma Nails. 12 years’ experience at a single centre. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:133.

Kashigar A, Vincent A, Gunton MJ, Backstein D, Safir O, Kuzyk PRT. Predictors of failure for cephalomedullary nailing of proximal femoral fractures. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-8:1029-34.

Caruso G, Bonomo M, Valpiani G, Salvatori G, Gildone A, Lorusso V, et al. A six-year retrospective analysis of cut-out risk predictors in cephalomedullary nailing for pertrochanteric fractures: Can the tip-apex distance (TAD) still be considered the best parameter? Bone Joint Res. 2017;6(8):481-8.

Murena L, Moretti A, Meo F, Saggioro E, Barbati G, Ratti C, et al. Predictors of cut-out after cephalomedullary nail fixation of pertrochanteric fractures: a retrospective study of 813 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018;138(3):351-9.

Tsai SW, Lin CFJ, Tzeng YH, Lin CC, Huang CK, Chang MC, et al. Risk factors for cut-out failure of Gamma3 nails in treating unstable intertrochanteric fractures: An analysis of 176 patients. J Chin Med Assoc. 2017;80(9):587-94.

Ciufo DJ, Zaruta DA, Lipof JS, Judd KT, Gorczyca JT, Ketz JP. Risk Factors Associated With Cephalomedullary Nail Cutout in the Treatment of Trochanteric Hip Fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2017;31(11):583-8.

Yoo J, Chang J, Park C, Hwang J. Risk Factors Associated with Failure of Cephalomedullary Nail Fixation in the Treatment of Trochanteric Hip Fractures. Clin Orthop Surg. 2020;12(1):29-36.

Geller JA, Saifi C, Morrison TA, Macaulay W. Tip-apex distance of intramedullary devices as a predictor of cut-out failure in the treatment of peritrochanteric elderly hip fractures. Int Orthop. 2010;34(5):719-22.

Lobo-Escolar A, Joven E, Iglesias D, Herrera A. Predictive factors for cutting-out in femoral intramedullary nailing. Injury. 2010;41(12):1312-6.

Lang NW, Breuer R, Beiglboeck H, Munteanu A, Hajdu S, Windhager R, et al. Migration of the lag screw after intramedullary treatment of AO/OTA 31.A2.1-3 pertrochanteric fractures does not Result in higher incidence of cut-outs, regardless of which implant was used: A comparison of gamma nail with and without u-blade (RC) lag screw and proximal femur nail antirotation (PFNA). J Clin Med. 2019;8(5):615.

Gazzotti G, Matino G, Tsatsis C, Sacchetti G, Baudi P, Catani F. Causes and treatments of lag screw’s cut out after intramedullary nailing osteosinthesis for trochanteric fractures. Acta Biomed. 2014;85(2):135-43.

Pascarella R, Fantasia R, Maresca A, Bettuzzi C, Amendola L, Violini S, et al. How evolution of the nailing system improves results and reduces orthopedic complications: more than 2000 cases of trochanteric fractures treated with the Gamma Nail System. Musculoskelet Surg. 2016;100(1):1-8.

Gamma 3TM: Compact titanium version of the gamma-nail system [Brochure]. Mahwah (NJ): Stryker; 2003.

Schupfner R, Käsmann LT, Wagner W, Schulz AP. Complications in Treatment of 31-A Fractures with Trochanteric Gamma Nail (TGN) Versus Gamma3 Nail (G3N) - A Review of 217 Cases. Open Orthop J. 2016;10:389-95.

Gamma3 trochanteric nail 170 & 180 [brochure]. Schonkirchen: Stryker trauma GmbH; 2005.

Hajian-Tilaki K. Sample size estimation in diagnostic test studies of biomedical informatics. J Biomed Inform. 2014;48:193-204.

van Gruting IMA, Stankiewicz A, Kluivers K, De Bin R, Blake H, Sultan AH, et al. Accuracy of Four Imaging Techniques for Diagnosis of Posterior Pelvic Floor Disorders. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(5):1017-24.

Caruso G, Corradi N, Caldaria A, Bottin D, Lo Re D, Lorusso V, et al. New tip-apex distance and calcar-referenced tip-apex distance cut-offs may be the best predictors for cut-out risk after intramedullary fixation of proximal femur fractures. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):357.

Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, Keggi JM. The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77(7):1058-64.

Kuzyk PR, Zdero R, Shah S, Olsen M, Waddell JP, Schemitsch EH. Femoral head lag screw position for cephalomedullary nails: a biomechanical analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26(7):414-21.