Clinico-radiological outcomes of proximal humerus fractures using locking compression plates among adults in a tertiary care hospital: an observational study

Authors

  • Kumar V. S. V. Department of Orthopaedics, Asian Orthopaedic Institute, SRM Institutes for Medical Science, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Velmurugan S. Department of Orthopaedics, Asian Orthopaedic Institute, SRM Institutes for Medical Science, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Rajesh Kumar Department of Orthopaedics, Asian Orthopaedic Institute, SRM Institutes for Medical Science, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Hemapriya A. S. Master of Public Health, Independent Researcher, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20242389

Keywords:

Functional outcome, Locking compression plates, ORIF, Proximal humerus fractures, Radiological union

Abstract

Background: Proximal humerus fractures represent 45% of humerus fractures and are the third most common fracture in the elderly due to trivial falls and weakened cancellous bone, and in the young population due to high-energy trauma. These fractures can be disabling and require surgical expertise for a good functional outcome. This study analyzes the clinico-radiological and functional outcomes of adult patients with proximal humerus fractures treated with locking compression plates.

Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted on patients with proximal humerus fractures treated with locking compression plates from June 2022 to June 2023 at SIMS Hospital, Chennai. Functional outcomes were measured using the SPADI score and radiological union of fractures at follow-ups of 2, 6, 12, and 24 weeks.

Results: In this study, 34 patients underwent ORIF with locking compression plates. All fractures healed completely without secondary procedures, nonunion, malunion, or implant failure. No postoperative complications were observed. The average time for radiological union was 14.5±2.4 weeks. The SPADI scores at 2, 6, 12, and 24 weeks were 82, 63.26, 22.26, and 4.06, respectively, showing statistically significant improvement (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: ORIF with locking compression plates, combined with proper anatomical reduction and suture augmentation of the rotator cuff, yields early ROM return and good functional outcomes. This method achieves earlier radiological union compared to other methods, making it the preferred choice for proximal humerus fractures across all age groups.

References

Helmy N, Hintermann B. New trends in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures. Clin Orthop. 2006;442:100-8.

Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review. Injury. 2006;37(8):691-7.

Chu SP, Kelsey JL, Keegan THM, Sternfeld B, Prill M, Quesenberry CP, et al. Risk factors for proximal humerus fracture. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;160(4):360-7.

Lind T, Krøner K, Jensen J. The epidemiology of fractures of the proximal humerus. Arch Orthopaed Trau Surg. 1989;108:285-7.

Zyto K. Non-operative treatment of comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus in elderly patients. Injury. 1998;29(5):349-52.

Gaebler C, McQueen M, Court-Brown C. Minimally displaced proximal humeral fractures epidemiology and outcome in 507 cases. Acta Orthopaed Scandi. 2003;74(5):580-5.

Koval KJ, Gallagher MA, Marsicano JG, Cuomo F, McShinawy A, Zuckerman JD. Functional outcome after minimally displaced fractures of the proximal part of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79(2):203-7.

Cornell CN. Internal fracture fixation in patients with osteoporosis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003;11(2):109-19.

Fankhauser F, Boldin C, Schippinger G, Haunschmid C, Szyszkowitz R. A new locking plate for unstable fractures of the proximal humerus. Clin Orthop. 2005;(430):176-81.

10. Gerber C, Werner CML, Vienne P. Internal fixation of complex fractures of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86(6):848-55.

Haidukewych GJ. Innovations in locking plate technology. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2004;12(4):205-12.

Resch H, Beck E, Bayley I. Reconstruction of the valgus-impacted humeral head fracture. J Should Elb Surg. 1995;4(2):73-80.

Zyto K, Ahrengart L, Sperber A, Törnkvist H. Treatment of displaced proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79(3):412-7.

Kristiansen B, Christensen SW. Plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand. 1986;57(4):320-3.

Siffri PC, Peindl RD, Coley ER, Norton J, Connor PM, Kellam JF. Biomechanical analysis of blade plate versus locking plate fixation for a proximal humerus fracture: comparison using cadaveric and synthetic humeri. J Orthopa Trau. 2006;20(8):547-54.

Doshi C, Sharma GM, Naik LG, Badgire KS, Qureshi F. Treatment of proximal humerus fractures using PHILOS Plate. J Clin Diagn Res JCDR. 2017;11(7):RC10-3.

Nho SJ, Brophy RH, Barker JU, Cornell CN, MacGillivray JD. Management of proximal humeral fractures based on current literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(Suppl 3):44-58.

Dheenadhayalan J, Prasad VD, Devendra A, Rajasekaran S. Correlation of radiological parameters to functional outcome in complex proximal humerus fracture fixation: A study of 127 cases. J Orthop Surg Hong Kong. 2019;27(2):2309499019848166.

Mahajan NP, Palange ND, Pawar ED, Mangukiya HJ, Ramteke US, Ravesh V, et al. Radiological correlation with functional outcome in displaced proximal humerus fractures treated with locking plates: a prospective study of 35 cases. Int J Res Orthop. 2018;4(3):471-9.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-28

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles