Role of magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating tuberculous spondylitis from pyogenic spondylitis in a TB endemic area
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20240322Keywords:
Tuberculous, Pyogenic, Spondylitis, Histopathological, Paraspinal, Intraosseous, AbscessAbstract
Background: Infectious spondylitis is an infection by a specific organism of one or more components of spine, namely the vertebra, intervertebral discs, paraspinal soft tissues, and epidural space. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the spine is gold standard in imaging to assess anatomical abnormalities of the spine and surrounding structures.
Methods: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted in the Department of Radiology Narayan Medical College and Hospital Sasaram, Bihar (India), where tuberculosis is endemic from July 2022 to September 2023. It included 40 patients, purposively sampled, adhering to strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MRI in discriminating tuberculous spondylitis from pyogenic spondylitis were compared against histopathological diagnosis and differences in MRI findings between these conditions were obtained.
Results: In this study, 93% patients with tuberculous spondylitis had an enhanced signal with well-defined margins. Meanwhile, pyogenic spondylitis provided an ill-defined margins in 72.7% patients. Most of the patients 82.7% with tuberculous spondylitis showed thin and smooth wall paravertebral abscesses, while pyogenic spondylitis showed an irregular and thick wall paravertebral abscesses in 45% patients. A total of 72.4% patients with tuberculous spondylitis indicated involvement of ≥3 vertebral bodies. 100% patients with pyogenic spondylitis showed an abnormal contrast enhancement of the intervertebral discs. It was identified that tuberculous spondylitis had sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values of 100%, 84.6%, and 95.2% respectively. For pyogenic spondylitis, the corresponding values were 84.6%, 96.6%, and 93%.
Conclusions: MRI was accurate for differentiation of tuberculous spondylitis from pyogenic spondylitis. A well-defined paraspinal abnormal signal, a thin and smooth abscess wall, subligamentous spread to three or more vertebral levels, and less likely involvement of intervertebral discs were more suggestive of tuberculous spondylitis than pyogenic spondylitis.
References
Sharif HS, Morgan JL, al Shahed MS, al Thagafi MY. Role of CT and MR imaging in the manage- ment of tuberculous spondylitis. Radiol Clin North Am. 1995;33:787–804
Arizono T, Oga M, Shiota E, Honda K, Sugioka Y. Differentiation of vertebral osteomyelitis and tuberculous spondylitis by magnetic resonance imaging. Int Orthop 1995;19:319–22.
Moore SL, Rafii M. Imaging of musculoskeletal and spinal tuberculosis. Radiol Clin North Am 2001;39:329–42.
Hackney DB, Daffner RH, Kransdorf MJ, Mukundan S Jr. ACR– ASNR–SCBT MR Practice Parameter For The Performance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of The Adult Spine. 2012. Available at: https://workspace.imperial.ac.uk/ref/Public/ UoA%2004%20%20Psychology,%20Psychiatry%20and%20Neuroscience/MRI_Adult_Spine. pdf. Accessed on 6 December, 2016.
Yueniwati Y, Widhiasi DE. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating spondylitis from vertebral metastasis. Asian Spine J. 2015;9(5):776–82.
Haaga JR. CT and MRI of the Whole Body. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby/ Elsevier; 2009.
Harada Y, Tokuda O, Matsunaga N. Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of tuberculous spondylitis vs. pyogenic spondylitis. Clin Imaging. 2008;32(4):303–9.
Khalid M, Siddiqui MA, Qaseem SM, Mittal S, Iraqi AA, Rizvi SA. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of tubercular spondylitis: pattern of disease in 100 patients with review of literature. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2011;51(183):116–21.
Garg RK, Somvanshi DS. Spinal tuberculosis: a review. J Spinal Cord Med. 2011;34(5):440–54.
Lee KY. Comparison of pyogenic spondylitis and tuberculous spondy- litis. Asian Spine J. 2014;8(2):216–23.
Thrush A, Enzmann D. MR imaging of infectious spondylitis AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1990;11(6):1171-80.
Vladimir Jevtic Vertebral infection Eur Radiol. 2004:14 Suppl 3:E43-52.
Thammaroj J, Kitkhuandee A, Sawanyawisuth K, Chowchuan P, Promon K. MR findings in spinal tuberculosis in an endemic country J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2014;58(3):267-76.
Jung NY, Jee WH, Ha KY, Park CK, Byun JY. Discrimination of Tuberculous Spondylitis from Pyogenic Spondylitis on MRI AJR Musculoskeletal Imaging. 2004;182.
Hidalgo JA. Pott Disease: Background, Pathophysiology, Epidemiology. Medscape; 2016. Available from: http://emedicine.medscape.com/ article/226141-overview. Accessed on 6 June, 2017.
