Comparison of calcareous replacement hemiarthroplasty and proximal femoral nail in elderly ıntertrochanteric femur fractures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20232462Keywords:
Intertrochanteric fracture, Cemented hemiartroplasty, PFNAbstract
Background: In this study, a retrospective evaluation was made of patients aged 70 years and over who were applied with proximal-femoral nail (PFN) or calcareous replacement cemented hemiarthroplasty in respect of early and late-stage morbidity and mortality and functional personal independence.
Methods: The study included a total of 77 patients aged over 70 years with an AO type 31-A1 or 31-A2 fracture. The patients were separated into two groups as those applied with proximal femoral nailing and those applied with calcar replacement hemiarthroplasty. Statistical comparison was made of the groups in respect of preoperative age, comorbidities, type of anaesthesia, ASA score, and fracture type, and postoperative amount of blood loss, albumin decrease, wound complications, other complications, Harris hip functional scores, Barthel daily living activity index, mortality rates.
Results: The two groups were found to be similar in respect of age, gender, comorbidities, AO fracture type and type of anaesthesia. The operating time was shorter in the proximal femoral nailing group. The Harris hip scores and the Barthel daily living activity ındex values were similar in both groups. Rates of wound infection were higher in the hemiarthroplasty group. Mortality rates at one month, six months and one year were similar in both groups.
Conclusions: Proximal femoral nailing can be one of the primary treatment options for intertrochanteric hip fractures in the elderly. Furthermore, although functional results and mortality rates are similar, as cemented calcar replacement hemiarthroplasty has serious life-threatening complications, it should not be the first choice of treatment method.
References
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Fatalities and injuries from falls among older adults--United States, 1993-2003 and 2001-2005. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006;55(45):1221-4.
Brauer CA, Coca-Perraillon M, Cutler DM, Rosen AB. Incidence and mortality of hip fractures in the United States. JAMA. 2009;302(14):1573-9.
Roth T, Kammerlander C, Gosch M, Luger TJ, Blauth M. Outcome in geriatric fracture patients and how it can be improved. Osteoporos Int. 2010;21(Suppl 4):S615-9.
Zhang Z, Ge J, Lu X, Chen G, Zhuo N. Evaluation on curative effect of three operative methods in treatment of senile intertrochanteric fracture. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009;23(5):556-61.
Jones HW, Johnston P, Parker M. Are short femoral nails superior to the sliding hip screw? A meta-analysis of 24 studies involving 3,279 fractures. Int Orthop. 2006;30(2):69-78.
Schipper IB, Steyerberg EW, Castelein RM, van der Heijden FH, den Hoed PT, Kerver AJ, et al. Treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures. Randomised comparison of the gamma nail and the proximal femoral nail. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86(1):86-94.
Takigami I, Matsumoto K, Ohara A, Yamanaka K, Naganawa T, Ohashi M, et al. Treatment of trochanteric fractures with the PFNA (proximal femoral nail antirotation) nail system - report of early results. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2008;66(4):276-9.
Rodop O, Kiral A, Kaplan H, Akmaz I. Primary bipolar hemiprosthesis for unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Int Orthop. 2002;26(4):233-7.
Liu L, Sun Y, Wang L, Gao Q, Li A, Wang J, et al. Total hip arthroplasty for intertrochanteric fracture fixation failure. Eur J Med Res. 2019;24(1):39.
Boldin C, Seibert FJ, Fankhauser F, Peicha G, Grechenig W, Szyszkowitz R. The proximal femoral nail (PFN)--a minimal invasive treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a prospective study of 55 patients with a follow-up of 15 months. Acta Orthop Scand. 2003;74(1):53-8.
Bakker A, Blokhuis TJ, Meeks MD, Hermens HJ, Holtslag HR. Dynamic weight loading in older people with hip fracture. J Rehabil Med. 2014;46(7):708-11.
Dubljanin-Raspopović E, Markovic Denić L, Marinković J, Grajić M, Tomanovic Vujadinović S, Bumbaširević M. Use of early indicators in rehabilitation process to predict one-year mortality in elderly hip fracture patients. Hip Int. 2012;22(6):661-7.
Lavini F, Renzi-Brivio L, Aulisa R, Cherubino F, Di Seglio PL, Galante N, et al. The treatment of stable and unstable proximal femoral fractures with a new trochanteric nail: results of a multicentre study with the Veronail. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2008;3(1):15-22.
Boldin CSF, Fankhauser F. The proximal femoral nail (PFN)-a minimal invasive treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: A prospective study of 55patients with a follow-up of 15 months. Acta Orthop Scand. 2003;74:53-8.
Anglen JO, Weinstein JN. Nail or plate fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures: changing pattern of practice. A review of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Database. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(4):700-7.
Takigami IMK, Ohara A, Yamanaka K, Naganawa T, Ohashi M, et al. Treatment of trochanteric fractures with the PFNA (proximal femoral nail antirotation) nail system—report of early results. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2008;66(4):276-9.
Weller I, Wai EK, Jaglal S, Kreder HJ. The effect of hospital type and surgical delay on mortality after surgery for hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(3):361-6.
Intiso D, Di Rienzo F, Grimaldi G, Lombardi T, Fiore P, Maruzzi G, et al., Survival and functional outcome in patients 90 years of age or older after hip fracture. Age Ageing. 2009;38(5):619-22.
Rodop OKA, Kaplan H, Akmaz I. Primary bipolar hemiprosthesis for unstable intertrochanteric fractures. Int Orthop. 2002;26:233-7.
Huang CG, Ye JJ. Comparison of three methods for the treatment of aged femoral intertrochanteric fracture. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2012;25(7):549-53.
Jin WJ, Dai LY, Cui YM, Zhou Q, Jiang LS, Lu H. Reliability of classification systems for intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur in experienced orthopaedic surgeons. Injury. 2005;36(7):858-61.
Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functıonal evaluatıon: the Barthel ındex. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61-5.
Güven M, Kocadal O. Akman B, Poyanlı OS, Kemah B, Atay EF. Proximal femoral nail shows better concordance of gait analysis between operated and uninjured limbs compared to hemiarthroplasty in intertrochanteric femoral fractures. Injury. 2016;47(6):1325-31.
Jolly A, Bansal R, More AR, Pagadala MB. Comparison of complications and functional results of unstable intertrochanteric fractures of femur treated with proximal femur nails and cemented hemiarthroplasty. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019;10(2):296-301.
Vatansever AOU, Okcu G. Femur üst uç kırıkları nedeniyle hemiartroplasti ile tedavi edilen hastalarda yaşam kalitesinin değerlendirilmesi. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2005;39:237-42.
Davison JN, Calder SJ, Anderson GH, Ward G, Jagger C, Harper WM, et al. Treatment for displaced intracapsular fracture of the proximal femur. A prospective, randomised trial in patients aged 65 to 79 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83(2):206-12.
Parker MJ, Pryor GA. Internal fixation or arthroplasty for displaced cervical hip fractures in the elderly: a randomised controlled trial of 208 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71(5):440-6.
Kim SY, Kim YG, Hwang JK. Cementless calcar-replacement hemiarthroplasty compared with intramedullary fixation of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(10):2186-92.
Intiso D, Di Rienzo F, Grimaldi G, Lombardi T, Fiore P, Maruzzi G, et al. Survival and functional outcome in patients 90 years of age or older after hip fracture. Age Ageing. 2009;38(5):619-22.