A study on the functional and radiological outcome with complications in the management of proximal humerus fractures operated with proximal humerus internal locking osteosynthesis system

Authors

  • Manideep Banerjee Department of Orthopaedics, R. G. Kar Medical College, West Bengal, India
  • Rajeev Biswas Department of Orthopaedics, R. G. Kar Medical College, West Bengal, India
  • Archak Roy Department of Orthopaedics, R. G. Kar Medical College, West Bengal, India https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5851-9452

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20231182

Keywords:

Proximal humerus fracture, Proximal humerus interlocking osteosynthesis system, Constant and Murley score

Abstract

Background: A number of opinions exist regarding the management of proximal humerus fractures starting from conservative to tension band-wiring to internal fixation with plates. The aim of this study is to assess the functional outcome, the radiological outcome and the complications associated with the management of proximal humerus fractures treated with proximal humerus interlocking osteosynthesis system (PHILOS).

Methods: A prospective descriptive study was undertaken comprising of 40 patients. Closed proximal humerus fractures meeting Neer’s criteria for operative displacement were enrolled. Patients underwent open reduction internal fixation with PHILOS plate. Post-operative radiological outcome was estimated with follow-up x-rays, functional outcome using the Constant and Murley score.

Results: 60% patients were female, with the most common mode of injury being fall at a ground level. Late complications were noted in 25% of patients, which were malunion 5%, joint stiffness 10%, joint instability 5% and heterotopic ossification 5%. The mean Constant and Murley score was 79.5 and it was found to be statistically significant to the type of fracture according to the Neer’s classification (Kruskal Wallis test, p=0.005). Joint stiffness was also found to be statistically significantly correlated to the type of fracture pattern (Chi square test, p=0.016). The average time to union was 10 weeks.

Conclusions: Thus, by this study it can be expressed due to appropriate articular reduction by open reduction and by the use of a fixed angle implant like the PHILOS plate, operative management of proximal humerus fractures by the said implant is a viable option to enable quick and early rehabilitation of patients.

References

Helmy N, Hintermann B: New trends in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;442:100-8.

Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review. Injury. 2006;37:691-7.

Mika P, Seppo N, Pekka K, Parkkari J. Update in the epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Clin Orthopaed Related Res. 2005;442:87-92.

Kettler M, Biberthaler P, Braunstein V, Zeiler C, Kroetz M, Mutschler W. Die winkelstabile Osteosynthese am proximalen Humerus mit der PHILOS-Platte. 2006;109(12):1032-40.

Leyshon RL. Closed treatment of fractures of proximal humerus. Acta Orthopaed Scand. 1984;55:48-51.

Kristiansen B, Christensen W. Late results in selection to classification and Treatment. Acta Orthopaed Scand. 1987;58;123-7.

Post M, Fractures of the upper humerus. Orthop Clin North Am. 1980;11(2):239-52.

Hawkins RJ, Bell RH, Gurr K. The three-part fracture of the proximal part of the humerus. Operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68(9):1410-4.

Cuomo F, Flatow EL, Maday MG, Miller SR, McIlveen SJ, Bigliani LU. Open reduction and internal fixation of two- and three-part displaced surgical neck fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1992;1(6):287-95.

Neer CS II. Displaced proximal humeral fractures: I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;52:1077-89.

Neer CS II. Displaced proximal humeral fractures: II. Treatment of three-part and four-part displacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;52:1090-103.

Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;214:160-4.

Kettler M, Biberthaler P, Braunstein V. Treatment of proximal humeral fractures with the PHILOS angular stable plate: presentation of 225 cases of dislocated fractures. Unfallchirurg. 2006;109:1032-40.

Fazal MA, Haddad FS. Philos plate fixation for displaced proximal humeral fractures. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2009;17(1):15-8.

Gerber C, Werner CM, Vienne P. Internal fixation of complex fractures of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86(6):848-55.

Björkenheim JM, Pajarinen J, Savolainen V. Internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with a locking compression plate: a retrospective evaluation of 72 patients followed for a minimum of 1 year. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75(6):741-5.

Aggarwal S, Bali K, Dhillon MS, Kumar V, Mootha AK. Displaced proximal humeral fractures: An Indian experience with locking plates. J Orthop Surg Res. 2010;5:60.

Charalambous CP, Siddique I, Valluripalli K, Kovacevic M, Panose P, Srinivasan M, et al. Proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS) for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007;127(3):205-10.

Egol KA, Ong CC, Walsh M, Jazrawi LM, Tejwani NC, Zuckerman JD. Early complications in proximal humerus fractures (OTA Types 11) treated with locked plates. J Orthop Trauma. 2008;22(3):159-64.

Martinez AA, Cuenca J, Herrera A. Philos plate fixation for proximal humeral fractures. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2009;17(1):10-4.

Brooks CH, Revell WJ, Heatley FW. Vascularity of the humeral head after proximal humeral fractures: an anatomical cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993; 75:132-6.

Gerber C, Schneeberger AG, Vinh TS. The arterial vascularization of the humeral head: an anatomical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:1486-94.

Erasmo R, Guerra G, Guerra L. Fractures and fracture-dislocations of the proximal humerus: A retrospective analysis of 82 cases treated with the Philos (®) locking plate. Injury. 2014;45(6):S43-8.

Rose PS, Adams CR, Torchia ME, Jacofsky DJ, Haidukewych GG, Steinmann SP. Locking plate fixation for proximal humeral fractures: initial results with a new implant. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007; 16(2):202-7.

Koukakis A, Apostolou CD, Taneja T, Korres DS, Amini A. Fixation of proximal humerus fractures using the PHILOS plate: early experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;442:115-20.

Acklin YP, Jenni R, Walliser M, Sommer C. Minimal Invasive PHILOS (®)-Plate Osteosynthesis in Proximal Humeral Fractures. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2009;35(1):35-9.

Oldrini LM, Feltri P, Albanese J, Marbach F, Filardo G, Candrian C. PHILOS synthesis for proximal humerus fractures has high complications and reintervention rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Life. 2022;12(2):311.

Singh H, Agarwal KK, Patel M, Makadia P, Jain P, Oza B. Comparative study between delto-pectoral and deltoid splitting approach in surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures using philos plating. Int J Res Orthop. 2022;8(3):365.

Aliuddin AM, Idrees Z, Rahim Najjad MK, Ali Shah SA. Functional Outcome of Proximal Humeral Fractures Treated with Philos Plate in Adults. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2016;28(2):337-40.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-28

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles