Assessment patient satisfaction after total hip replacement in Indian population
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20230465Keywords:
PSS score, Total hip replacement, Patient satisfactionAbstract
Background: We aim to assess the satisfaction of patients after total hip replacement in Indian population. Nоwаdаys tоtаl hiр аrthrорlаsty is the finаl treаtment орtiоn рrоvided tо раtients with unsаlvаgeаble, severely аrthritiс, раinful аnd defоrmed hiрs. Раtient sаtisfасtiоn hаs been meаsured in multiрle оrthораediс рrосedures, inсluding tоtаl hiр аrthrорlаsty. THА is а соmmоn surgiсаl рrосedure thаt imрrоves the lives оf раtients with end-stаge аrthritis by deсreаsing раin, аnd imрrоving mоtоr function and mоbility аs measured by vаlidаted heаlth-relаted оutсоme tооls.
Methods: Patients were assessed at OPD visit or with telephonic conversation scores are calculated and mentioned in excel sheet. Post-surgery satisfaction score is the score created to measure the satisfaction after total hip replacement. This score contains different questionnaires. These questions include inquiry about relieve of pain, ability to do daily routine activities, requirement of walking aids etc. Score contains total 7 questions with answers.
Results: Out of 95 patients we found through this study that about 92.63% of patients are satisfied after total hip replacement. 7.37% of patients are dissatisfied. Satisfaction rate is more as compared to dissatisfaction rate.
Conclusions: In present study we have tried to eliminate other factors responsible for dissatisfaction such as hospital ward cleanliness, hospital administration, patient and hospital staff communication. We recommend total hip replacement surgery for end stage arthritis and is more beneficial to the patients in terms of improvement in post-operative pain and function.
References
Semlitsch M, Panic B. Ten years of experience with test criteria for fracture- proof anchorage stems of artificial hip joints. Engin Med. 1983;12(4):185-98.
Schmalzried TP, Peters PC, Maurer BT, Bragdon CR, Harris WH. Long- duration metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties with low wear of the articulating surfaces. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11(3):322-31.
Clarke IC. Wear of artificial joint materials IV. Engin Med. 1981;10(4):189-98.
Onieal ME. Patient Satisfaction: Within Arm’s Reach, or Bending Over Backward? Clin Rev. 2017; 27(1):13-4.
Pascoe GC. Patient satisfaction in primary health care: a literature review and analysis. Eval Prog Plan J. 1983;6(3-4):185-210.
Chughtai M, Gwam CU, Khlopas A, Sodhi N, Delanois RE, Spindler KP, et al. No correlation between press ganey survey responses and outcomes in post-total hip arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty. 2018;33(3):783-5.
Anakwe RE, Jenkins PJ, Moran M. Predicting dissatisfaction after total hip arthroplasty: a study of 850 patients. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26(2):209-13.
Delanois RE, Gwam CU, Mistry JB, Chughtai M, Khlopas A, Yakubek G, et al. Does gender influence how patients rate their patient experience after total hip arthroplasty? Hip Int. 2018;28(1):40-3.
Brokelman RB, Haverkamp D, van Loon C, Hol A, van Kampen A, Veth R. The validation of the visual analogue scale for patient satisfaction after total hip arthroplasty. Eur Orthopaed Traumatol. 2012;3(2): 101-5.
Rolfson O, Kärrholm J, Dahlberg L, Garellick G. Patient-reported outcomes in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register: results of a nationwide prospective observational study. J Bone Joint Surg. 2011;93(7):867-75.
Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M, Lozano R, Michaud C, Ezzati M, et al. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2163-96.
Pereira D, Peleteiro B, Araujo J, Branco J, Santos R, Ramos E. The effect of osteoarthritis definition on prevalence and incidence estimates: a systematic review. Osteoarthr Cartilage. 2011;19(11):1270-85.
Picavet H, Hazes J. Prevalence of self reported musculoskeletal diseases is high. Ann Rheumat Dis. 2003;62(7):644-50.
Woolf AD, Pfleger B. Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Bull World Health Org. 2003;81:646-56.
Higashi H, Barendregt JJ. Cost-effectiveness of total hip and knee replacements for the Australian population with osteoarthritis: discrete-event simulation model. PloS One. 2011;6(9):e25403.
Ng C, Ballantyne J, Brenkel I. Quality of life and functional outcome after primary total hip replacement: a five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg. 2007;89(7):868-73.
Baumann C, Rat AC, Osnowycz G, Mainard D, Cuny C, Guillemin F. Satisfaction with care after total hip or knee replacement predicts self-perceived health status after surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009;10(1):1-8.
Mancuso CA, Salvati EA. Patients' satisfaction with the process of total hip arthroplasty. J Healthcare Quality. 2003;25(2):12-8.
Sitzia J, Wood N. Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts. Social Sci Med. 1997;45(12): 1829-43
Beverland D. Patient satisfaction following TKA: bless them all!. Orthopedics. 2010;33(9):43-9.
Otani K, Kurz RS, Harris LE, Byrne FD. Managing primary care using patient satisfaction measures/ practitioner application. J Healthcare Manag. 2005;5 0(5):311.
Arab M, Tabatabaei SG, Rashidian A, Forushani AR, Zarei E. The effect of service quality on patient loyalty: a study of private hospitals in Tehran, Iran. Iranian J Public Health. 2012;41(9):71.
Zeithaml VA, Berry LL, Parasuraman A. The behavioral consequences of service quality. J Market. 1990;60(3):46.
Tung Y-C, Chang G-M. Patient satisfaction with and recommendation of a primary care provider: associations of perceived quality and patient education. Int J Quality Health Care. 2009;21(3):206-13.
Sun BC, Adams J, Orav EJ, Rucker DW, Brennan TA, Burstin HR. Determinants of patient satisfaction and willingness to return with emergency care. Ann Emerg Med. 2000;35(5):426-34.