Double-plating approach in the management of isolated distal femoral fractures

Authors

  • Sunil Kulkarni Department of Orthopaedics, Post Graduate Institute Swasthiyog Pratishthan, Miraj, Maharashtra, India
  • Saurabh R. Supare Department of Orthopaedics, Post Graduate Institute Swasthiyog Pratishthan, Miraj, Maharashtra, India
  • Anjan Nadange Department of Orthopaedics, Post Graduate Institute Swasthiyog Pratishthan, Miraj, Maharashtra, India
  • Rohith Garimella Department of Orthopaedics, Post Graduate Institute Swasthiyog Pratishthan, Miraj, Maharashtra, India
  • Pranit Pawaskar Department of Orthopaedics, Post Graduate Institute Swasthiyog Pratishthan, Miraj, Maharashtra, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20223442

Keywords:

Dual-plating, Distal femur, Locking compression plate

Abstract

Background: Fractures above 9 cm of the articular surface of distal femur are defined as distal femoral fractures which accounts for an estimated 4%-6% of all femur fractures. Stable fixation can be achieved by dual plating of distal femoral fracture. The indications of a dual- lateral and medial plate medial are comminuted distal femur fractures (AO type C3), medial supra-condylar void and bone loss of more than 3 cm, medial Hoffa fracture, inter-condylar comminuted bicondylar fractures, non-union after failed fixation with single lateral plate, poor bone quality.

Methods: The retrospective research study of 35 cases of distal femoral fractures which were treated with lateral and medial plates in post graduate institute Swasthiyog Pratishthan, Miraj (G. S. Kulkarni Hospital, Miraj). The study period was from September 2020 to May 2022. The average follow-up was 8 months.

Results: 1 year after operation, knee function was evaluated by Oxford knee score along with Mean EQ-5D-5 L score. Functionally the mean oxford knee score was 41.53±1.69, with a maximum Oxford Knee Score of 48. Mean EQ-5D-5 L score was 83.8 (72-82). Average time to union was 9 months (6-12 months). Four (17.4%) cases needed autologous bone graft.

Conclusions: Double incision dual-plating approach for distal femoral fractures is effective and provides stable construct without reduction loss allowing early rehabilitation. Single lateral plating of distal femur fractures was associated with relatively higher failure rate. Addition of medial plate along with lateral plate reduces chances of fixation failure.

References

Chapman J, Henley M. Double plating of distal femur fractures: indications and technique. Tech Orthop. 1994;9:210-6.

Imam MA, Torieh A, Matthana A. Double plating of intra-articular multifragmentary C3-type distal femoral fractures through the anterior approach. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018;28:121-30.

Steinberg E, Elis J, Steinberg Y, Salai M, Ben-Tov T. A double-plating approach to distal femur fracture: a clinical study. Injury. 2017;48:2260-5.

Gwathmey W, Jones-Quaidoo S, Kahler D, Hurwitz S, Cui Q. Distal femoral fractures: current concepts. Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010;18:597-607.

Rajasekaran RB, Jayaramaraju D, Palanisami D, Agraharam D, Perumal R, Kamal A, et al. A surgical algorithm for the management of recalcitrant distal femur nonunions based on distal femoral bone stock, fracture alignment, medial void, and stability of fixation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019;139:1057-68.

Pie´tu G, Ehlinger M. Minimally invasive internal fixation of distal femur fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;103(1S):S161-9.

Lujan TJ, Henderson CE, Madey SM, Fitzpatrick DC, Marsh JL, Bottlang M. Locked plating of distal femur fractures leads to inconsistent and asymmetric callus formation. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24(3):156-62.

Henderson CE, Bottlang M, Marsh JL, Fitzpatrick DC, Madey SM. Does locked plating of periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures promote bone healing by callus formation? Two cases with opposite outcomes. Iowa Orthop J. 2008;28:73-6.

Hutson JJ, Zych GA. Treatment of comminuted intraarticular distal femur fractures with limited internal and external tensioned wire fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 2000;14(6):405-13.

Chapman J, Henley M. Double plating of distal femur fractures: indications and technique. Tech Orthop. 1994;9:210-6.

Kregor PJ, Stannard JA, Zlowodzki M, Cole PA. Treatment of distal femur fractures using the less invasive stabilization system: surgical experience and early clinical results in 103 fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18(8):509-20.

Merritt K. Factors increasing the risk of infection in patients with open fractures. J Trauma. 1988;28:823-7.

Worlock P, Slack R, Harvey L, Mawhinney R. The prevention of infection in open fractures: An experimental study of the effect of fracture stability. Injury. 1994;25:31-8.

Merritt K, Dowd JD. Role of internal fixation in infection of open fractures: Studies with Staphylococcus aureus and Proteus mirabilis. J Orthop Res. 1987;5:23-8.

Arazi M, Memik R, Ogu¨n TC, Yel M. Ilizarov external fixation for severely comminuted supracondylar and intercondylar fractures of the distal femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83(5):663-7.

Marsh JL, Jansen H, Yoong HK, Found EM. Supracondylar fractures of the femur treated by external fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 1997;11(6):405-11.

Ali F, Saleh M. Treatment of isolated complex distal femoral fractures by external fixation. Injury. 2000;31(3):139-46.

Beltran MJ, Gary JL, Collinge CA. Management of distal femur fractures with modern plates and nails: state of the art. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29(4):165-72.

Janzing HM, Stockman B, Van Damme G, Rommens P, Broos PL. The retrograde intramedullary supracondylar nail: an alternative in the treatment of distal femoral fractures in the elderly? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1998;118(1-2):92-5.

Ingman AM. Retrograde intramedullary nailing of supracondylar femoral fractures: design and development of a new implant. Injury. 2002;33(8):707-12.

Handolin L, Pajarinen J, Lindahl J, Hirvensalo E. Retrograde intramedullary nailing in distal femoral fractures-results in a series of 46 consecutive operations. Injury. 2004;35(5):517-22.

Watanabe Y, Takai S, Yamashita F, Kusakabe T, Kim W, Hirasawa Y. Second-generation intramedullary supracondylar nail for distal femoral fractures. Int Orthop. 2002;26(2):85-8.

Rodriguez EK, Boulton C, Weaver MJ. Predictive factors of distal femoral fracture nonunion after lateral locked plating: a retrospective multicenter case-control study of 283 fractures. Injury. 2014;45(3):549-54.

Kregor PJ, Stannard J, Zlowodzki M, Cole PA, Alonso J. Distal femoral fracture fixation utilizing the Less Invasive Stabilization System (L.I.S.S.): the technique and early results. Injury. 2001;32(3):SC32-47.

Ricci WM, Streubel PN, Morshed S, Collinge CA, Nork SE, Gardner MJ. Risk factors for failure of locked plate fixation of distal femur fractures: an analysis of 335 cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2014;28(2):83-9.

Large TM, Kellam JF, Bosse MJ, Sims SH, Althausen P, Masonis JL. Locked plating of supracondylar periprosthetic femur fractures. J Arthroplasty. 2008; 23(6):115-20.

Schu¨tz M, Mu¨ller M, Krettek C. Minimally invasive fracture stabilization of distal femoral fractures with the LISS: a prospective multicenter study. Results of a clinical study with special emphasis on difficult cases. Injury. 2001;32(3):SC48-54.

Kim JW, Oh CW, Oh JK. Malalignment after minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in distal femoral fractures. Injury. 2017;48(3):751-7

Briffa N, Karthickeyan R, Jacob J, Khaleel A. Comminuted supracondylar femoral fractures: a biomechanical analysis comparing the stability of medial versus lateral plating in axial loading. Strat Trauma Limb Reconst. 2016;11(3):187-91.

Prayson MJ, Datta DK, Marshall MP. Mechanical comparison of endosteal substitution and lateral plate fixation in supracondylar fractures of the femur. J Orthop Trauma. 2001;15(2):96-100.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-28

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles