Outcome analysis of cross-pinning versus lateral pinning and various lateral pinning configuration in the treatment of displaced paediatric supracondylar humerus fracture

Authors

  • Deva Paramasivam Department of Orthopaedics, Sri Ramachandra Institute of higher education and research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Thirunthaiyan Ramachandran Department of Orthopaedics, Sri Ramachandra Institute of higher education and research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Tarun Prashanth Ravindranath Department of Orthopaedics, Sri Ramachandra Institute of higher education and research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Doraikumar Raja Department of Orthopaedics, Sri Ramachandra Institute of higher education and research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  • Aravindh Sellakrishnan Department of Orthopaedics, Sri Ramachandra Institute of higher education and research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20221623

Keywords:

Lateral pin, Cross pin, Supracondylar fracture, Paediatrics

Abstract

Background: Supracondylar humerus fracture accounts for 3% of all the paediatric fractures. Displaced fractures need usually closed but rarely open reduction and stabilization with k-wires by either cross or lateral pinning technique. Controversies prevail regarding the type of pinning which will reduce complications (such as ulnar nerve palsy and loss of reduction which will lead to cubitus varus deformity) and provides better functional and radiological outcome. The aim of study was to analyse outcomes of various pinning techniques in displaced supracondylar humerus fracture treatment.

Methods: This was a prospective study done in SRIHER, Chennai (January 2019 to September 2020) included children with displaced supracondylar humerus fracture (modified Gartland type 2B,3). Preop, postop and intraop assessment were done with respect to incidence of ulnar nerve palsy, Baumann's angle, Flynn criteria till 14 weeks postop period. The results of cross pinning and lateral pinning group were statistically compared.

Results: There were totally 37 (male-25, female-12) patients. Mean age was 5.6. The mean change in Baumann’s angle of cross pin and lateral pin group at 14 weeks postop period comparing immediate postop period were 4.13 and 4.15 degrees, which was statistically insignificant using Mann Whitney test (p>0.05). Flynn criteria at 14 weeks postop period between two groups were also statistically insignificant. Difference in Baumann’s angle at 14 weeks postop period between divergent (2.82) and parallel (5.53) pin group was statistically significant using Mann Whitney test (0.01). There were no cases of ulnar nerve injury in both the groups.

Conclusions: Lateral pinning technique with the use of 3 divergent pins for the treatment of displaced supracondylar humerus fracture gives stability as good as cross pin configuration and also avoids the risk of ulnar nerve injury.

References

Gartland JJ. Management of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1959;109(2):145-54.

Alton TB, Werner SE, Gee AO. Classifications in brief: the Gartland classification of supracondylar humerus fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(2):738-41.

de Gheldere A, Legname M, Leyder M, Mezzadri G, Docquier PL, Lascombes P. Reliability of the Lagrange and Rigault classification system of supracondylar humerus extension fractures in children. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010;96(6):652-5.

Skaggs DL, Hale JM, Bassett J, Kaminsky C, Kay RM, Tolo VT. Operative treatment of supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. The consequences of pin placement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83(5):735-40.

Teo TL, Schaeffer EK, Habib E, Cherukupalli A, Cooper AP, Aroojis A et al. Assessing the reliability of the modified Gartland classification system for extension-type supracondylar humerus fractures. J Child Orthop. 2019;13(6):569-74.

Young S, Fevang JM, Gullaksen G, Nilsen PT, Engesæter LB. Deformity and functional outcome after treatment for supracondylar humerus fractures in children: a 5- to 10-year follow-up of 139 supracondylar humerus fractures treated by plaster cast, skeletal traction or crossed wire fixation. J Child Orthop. 2010;4(5):445-53.

Kinkpé CV, Dansokho AV, Niane MM, Chau E, Sales de Gauzy J, Clement JL et al. Children distal humerus supracondylar fractures: the Blount Method experience. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010;96(3):276-82.

Muccioli C, ElBatti S, Oborocianu I, Rosello O, Solla F, Chau E et al. Outcomes of Gartland type III supracondylar fractures treated using Blount's method. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;103(7):1121-5.

Behdad A, Behdad S, Hosseinpour M. Pediatric elbow fractures in a major trauma center in iran. Arch Trauma Res. 2013;1(4):172-5.

Lee YH, Lee SK, Kim BS, Chung MS, Baek GH, Gong HS et al. Three lateral divergent or parallel pin fixations for the treatment of displaced supracondylar humerus fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 2008;28(4):417-22.

Gordon JE, Patton CM, Luhmann SJ, Bassett GS, Schoenecker PL. Fracture stability after pinning of displaced supracondylar distal humerus fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop. 2001;21(3):313-8.

Zionts LE, McKellop HA, Hathaway R. Torsional strength of pin configurations used to fix supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76(2):253-6.

Otsuka NY. In Children with Supracondylar Humeral Fractures, Crossed Pins Increased Fracture Stability Compared with Lateral Pins. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(22):1935.

Foead A, Penafort R, Saw A, Sengupta S. Comparison of two methods of percutaneous pin fixation in displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2004;12(1):76-82.

Prashant K, Lakhotia D, Bhattacharyya TD, Mahanta AK, Ravoof A. A comparative study of two percutaneous pinning techniques (lateral vs medial-lateral) for Gartland type III pediatric supracondylar fracture of the humerus. J Orthop Traumatol. 2016;17(3):223-9.

Kocher MS, Kasser JR, Waters PM, Bae D, Snyder BD, Hresko MT et al.Lateral entry compared with medial and lateral entry pin fixation for completely displaced supracondylar humeral fractures in children. A randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(4):706-12.

Zamzam MM, Bakarman KA. Treatment of displaced supracondylar humeral fractures among children: crossed versus lateral pinning. Injury. 2009;40(6):625-30.

James L, Edwin A Hoffer M. Ulnar Nerve Palsies After Percutaneous Cross- Pinning of Supracondylar Fractures in Children's Elbows, J. Pediatr Orthop. 1998;18(1):43-5.

Green DW, Widmann RF, Frank JS, Gardner MJ. Low incidence of ulnar nerve injury with crossed pin placement for pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures using a mini -open technique. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19(3):158-63.

Maity A, Saha D, Roy DS. A prospective randomised, controlled clinical trial comparing medial and lateral entry pinning with lateral entry pinning for percutaneous fixation of displaced extension type supracondylar fractures of the humerus in children. J Orthop Surg Res. 2012;7:6.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-24

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles