DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20164789

Anterior referencing versus posterior referencing in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective observational study

Preetesh Choudhary, Skand Bahre, Vinay Tantuway, Ashok Nagla, Avinash Jain, Rishi Gupta

Abstract


Background: Femoral component rotation in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is essential for patella-femoral tracking, flexion gap balance and normal kinematic function of the knee. The two referencing techniques used for sizing and adjudging the femoral rotation are anterior referencing (AR) and posterior referencing (PR).The current study was designed so as to identify which referencing system determines the femoral rotation more accurately.

Methods: This study involved 34 consecutive patients (22 females and 12 males) with 60 osteoarthritic knees (bilateral=26; unilateral =8) who satisfied the inclusion criteria. The trans-epicondylar axis, was taken as gold standard to adjudge the correct femoral rotation and was marked as E. The axis of rotation as per anterior instrumentation (A), and as per posterior instrumentation (P) were marked and compared as to which of the axis (A or P) was parallel to E.

Results: A was always parallel to E, however P was parallel to E in 42 knees. In 18 knees (6 with valgoid deformity, 12 with hypertrophic osteoarthritis involving the medial femoral condyle), P and E tend to converge laterally, suggestive of excessive internal rotation.

Conclusions: Anterior referencing determines femoral rotation more accurately than posterior referencing for knees with severe valgoid deformity or those with hypertrophic osteoarthritis involving the overgrowth of medial femoral condyle.


Keywords


Femoral rotation, Anterior referencing, Posterior referencing, Valgoid deformity, Osteoarthritis, Total knee arthroplasty

Full Text:

PDF

References


Fokin AA, Heekin RD. Anterior referencing versus posterior referencing in total arthroplasty. J Knee Surg. 2014;27(4):303-8.

Vail TP, Lang JE. Surgical techniques and Instrumentation in Total Knee arthroplasty lnsall and scott surgery of the knee, Fourth edition. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2006: 1455-1521.

Barrack RL, Schrader T, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, Myers L. Component rotation and anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001;392:46-55.

Kienapfel H, Springorum HP, Ziegler A, Klose KJ, Georg C, Griss P. Effect of rotation of the femoral and tibial components on patellofemoral malalignment in knee arthroplasty. Orthopade. 2003;32(4):312-8.

Matsuda S, Miura H, Nagamine R, Urabe K, Hirata G, Iwamoto Y. Effect of femoral and tibial component position on patellar tracking following total knee arthroplasty: 10-year follow-up of Miller- Galante I knees. Am J Knee Surg. 2001;14(3):152-6.

Moshizuki RM, Schuman DJ. Patellar complications following total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am.1979;61(6):879-83.

Berger RA. Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Ruhash HF. Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin orthop Relat Res. 1998;356:14-53.

Anouchi YS, Whiteside LA, Kaiser AD, Milliano MT. The effect of axial rotational alignment of the femoral component on knee stability and patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty demonstrated on autopsy specimens. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;287:170-7.

Mantas JP, Bloebaum RD, Skedros JG, Hoffman AA. Implications of reference axes used for rotational alignment of the femoral component in primary and revision knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty.1992;7(4):531-5.

Griffin FM, lnsall JN, Scuderi GR. The posterior condylar angle in osteoarthritic knees. J Arthroplasty.1998;13(7):812-5.

Poilvache PL, Insall JN, Scuderi GR, Font-Rodriguez DE. Rotational landmarks and sizing of the distal femur in total arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;331:35-46.

Berger RA, Rubash HE, Seel MJ, Thompson WH, Crossett LS. Determining the rotational alignment of the femoral component in total knee arthroplasty using the epicondylar axis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;286:40-7.

Smith JL Jr, Tullos HS, Davidson JP. Alignment of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1989;4:55-61.

Stiehl JB, Cherveny PM. Femoral rotational alignment using the tibial shaft axis in total knee arthroplasy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;331:47-55.

Thienpont E, Schwab PE, Paternostre F, Koch P. Rotational alignment of the distal femur: anthropometric measurements with CT-based patient-specific instruments planning show high variability of the posterior condylar angle. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(12):2995-3002.

Schnurr C, Nessler J, Konig DP. Is referencing the posterior condyles sufficient to achieve a rectangular flexion gap in total knee arthroplasty? Int Orthop. 2009;33(6):1561-5.

Mastsuda S, Miura H, Nagamine R, Mawatari T, Tokunaga M, Nabeyama R, et al. Anatomical analysis of the femoral condyle in normal and osteoarthritic knees. J Orthop Res. 2004;22(1):104-9.

Yau WP, Chiu K Y, Tang WM. How precise is the determination of rotational alignment of the femoral prosthesis in the total knee arthroplasty: an in vivo study. J Arthroplasty. 2007;22:1042-8.

Churchill DL, Incavo SJ, Johnson CC, Beynnon BD. The transepicondylar axis approximates the optimal flexion axis of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;356:111-8.