Comparison of locking compression plating vs retrograde intramedullary nailing in distal femur extra-articular fractures
Keywords:Distal femur fractures, Intramedullary nailing, Locking plates
Background: The purpose of the study was to compare the outcome of distal femur extra articular fractures treated with locking plate and retrograde intramedullary nail.
Methods: 86 patients’ distal femur extra-articular fractures were included in the study. 44 patients were operated with intramedullary nailing; 42 patients were operated with locking plate. Results of the 2 groups were compared with regards to clinical and radiological outcome, intraoperative timing and blood loss. Post-operative status of the patients was evaluated using the visual analogue scale, neer score, knee range of motion and radiological union on plain radiographs. Patients were followed-up at 4 weekly intervals from 8 to 28 weeks and then at 1 year.
Results: Mean operative time and blood loss was less in intramedullary nailing group whereas intraoperative blood loss was less in the plating group. 6 patients developed surgical site infection in the plating group. Mean-time till radiological union was significantly better in intramedullary nailing group. 7 patients in plating group had issues with union (5 non-union, 2 delayed union) whereas 1 patient in IMN group had nonunion. 93% of intramedullary nailing cases were able to bear full weight at 12 weeks compared to 66% cases in plate group. Knee pain at 6 months was more in intramedullary nailing group.
Conclusions: IMN proved to be a better modality of fixation of distal femur fracture fixation in our study in terms of operative time, union rates, infection rates and overall patient outcome if done with proper principles and techniques of intramedullary fixation.
Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury. 2006;37:691-7.
Martinet O, Cordey J, Harder Y. The epidemiology of fractures of the distal femur. Injury. 2000;31(3):C62-3.
Schandelmaier P, Partenheimer A, Koenemann B. Distal femoral fractures and LISS stabilization. Injury. 2001;32(3):SC55-63.
Zlowodzki M, Bhandari M, Marek DJ, Cole PA, Kregor PJ. Operative treatment of acute distal femur fractures: systematic review of 2 comparative studies and 45 case series, 1989 to 2005. J Orthop Trauma 2006;20:366-71.
Thomson AB, Driver R, Kregor PJ, Obremskey WT. Long-term functional outcomes after intra-articular distal femur fractures: ORIF versus retrograde intramedullary nailing. Orthopedics. 2008;3:748-50.
Browner BD, Edwards CC. The science and practice of intramedullary nailing. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger, 1987;17-23
Gustilo RB, Anderson JT. Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976;58:453-8.
Neer II CS, Grantham SA, Shelton ML. Supracondylar Fracture of the Adult Femur. J Bone Joint Surg. 1967;49A:591-613.
Gupta SKV, Govindappa CVS, Yalamanchili RK. Outcome of retrograde intramedullary nailing and locking compression plating of distal femoral fractures in adults. OA Orthopaedics. 2013;1(3):23.
Kregor PJ, Stannard JA, Zlowodzki M, Cole PA. Treatment of distal femur frac¬tures using the less invasive stabilization system: surgical experience and early clinical results in 103 fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18(8):509-20.
Gao K, Gao W, Huang J, Li H, Li F, Tao J, Et Al. Retrograde Nailing Versus Locked Plating of Extra-Articular Distal Femoral Fractures: Comparison Of 36 Cases. Med Princ Pract. 2013;22:161-6.
Shetty A, Shetty SK, Ballal A, Hegde A. Retrograde Femur Nailing Versus Locking Plate Fixation for Extra-Articular Distal Femur Fractures: a Comparative Study of Functional and Radiological Outcomes of The Two Techniques. IJCR. 2016;5:3.
Markmiller M, Konrad G, Südkamp N. Femur-Liss And Distal Femoral Nail For Fixation Of Distal Femoral Fractures: Are There Differences In Outcome And Complications? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;426:252-7.
Demirtas A, Azboy, Ozkul E. Comparison of retrograde intramedullary nailing and 2 bridge plating in the treatment of extra-articular fractures of the distal femur. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2014;48(5):521-6.
Hoskins W, Sheehy R, Edwards ER, Hau RC, Bucknill A, Parsons N et al. Nails or plates for fracture of the distal femur? Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B:846-50.
Krishna C, Shankar RV. Current concept of management of supracondylar femur fracture: retrograde femoral nail or distal femoral locking plate. Int Surg J. 2016;3:1356-9.
Herrera DA, Kregor PH, Cole PA, Levy B, Jonsson A, Zlowodzki M. Treatment of acute distal femur fractures above a total knee arthroplasty: Systematic review of 415 cases (1981-2006) Acta Orthop. 2008;79(1):22-7.
Lujan TJ, Henderson CE, Madley SM, Fitzpatrick DC, Marsh JL, Bottlang M. Locked plating of distal femur fractures leads to inconsistent and asymmetric callus formation. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24:156-62.
Zehntner MK, Marchesi DG, Burch H, Ganz R. Alignment of supracondylar/intercondylar fractures of the femur after internal fixation by AO/ASIF technique. J Orthop Trauma. 1992;6:318-26.
Schandelmaier P, Stephan C, Krettek C, Tscherne H. Distale femurfrakturen. Unfallchirurg. 200;103:428-36.
Dileep KS, Mahesha K. Retrograde intramedullary nailing for fractures of distal femur: a prospective study. Int J Res Orthop. 2016;2:276-9.
Griffin XL, Costa ML, Phelps E, Parsons N, Dritsaki M, Achten J et al. Intramedullary nails versus distal locking plates for fracture of the distal femur: results from the Trial of Acute Femoral Fracture Fixation (TrAFFix) randomized feasibility study and process evaluation. Bio Med J Open. 2019;9:e026810.