Functional outcome of zone 5 to zone 8 extensor tendon injuries of hand managed with early active mobilization following repair using a static splint: an observational study

Authors

  • Sourav Bhattacharjee Department of Orthopedics, Little Flower Hospital and Research Center, Angamaly, Kerala
  • Ashir Abdul Rasheed Department of Orthopedics, Little Flower Hospital and Research Center, Angamaly, Kerala
  • Binu Alex Department of Orthopedics, Little Flower Hospital and Research Center, Angamaly, Kerala

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20210483

Keywords:

Extensor tendon injury, Early active mobilization, Static splinting

Abstract

Background: Injuries to extensor tendons of the hand are underrepresented in the literature compared to flexor tendons. The concept of early mobilization following extensor tendon repair emerged as previous strategies of static immobilization lead to frequent adhesions and poor outcome. In our study we assessed the functional outcome of early active mobilization after extensor tendon repair using a static splint.  

Methods: In this observational study 42 patients with 48 extensor tendon severances of the hand from zone 5 to 8 were selected. Following repair, early active mobilization with a static splint was done and the functional outcomes were assessed using the Dargan criteria.

Results: After mobilizing for 4 weeks, out of total 48 patients, 18 (43%) had good outcomes, 19 (45%) had fair and 5 patients (12%) had poor outcome. After 6 weeks 14 patients (33.3%) had excellent, 20 patients (48%) had good and 6 patients (14%) had fair outcomes whereas only one patient (2.4%) had poor outcome. This result was statistically significant with a p value of 0.000.

Conclusions: Early active mobilization following extensor tendon repair from zone 5 to 8 prevents adhesion around the repair site, leads to better post-operative outcome and faster recovery. Using a static splint along with a patient friendly, easily comprehensible rehabilitation protocol offers results comparable to the use of dynamic splints and requires fewer post-operative follow ups. The static splints being cheap, easy to construct are financially beneficial to the patients.  

Author Biography

Sourav Bhattacharjee, Department of Orthopedics, Little Flower Hospital and Research Center, Angamaly, Kerala

DNB Trinee,

Department of Orthopedics,

Little Flower Hospital and Research Centre,

Angamaly, Kerala.

References

Clark DP, Scott RN, Anderson IW. Hand problems in an accident and emergency department. J Hand Surg Br. 1985;10(3):297-99.

de Jong JP, Nguyen JT, Sonnema AJ, Nguyen EC, Amadio PC, Moran SL. The incidence of acute traumatic tendon injuries in the hand and wrist: a 10-year population-based study. Clin Orthop Surg. 2014;6(2):196- 202.

Tuncali D, Yavuz N, Terzioglu A, Aslan G. The rate of upper- extremity deep-structure injuries through small penetrating lacerations. Ann Plast Surg. 2005;55(2):146-48.

Mehdinasab SA, Pipelzadeh MR, Sarrafan N. Results of primary extensor tendon repair of the hand with respect to the zone of injury. Arch Trauma Res. 2012;1(3):131-4.

Newport ML, Blair WF, Steyers CM Jr. Long-term results of extensor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am. 1990;15(6):961-6.

Browne EZ Jr, Ribik CA. Early dynamic splinting for extensor tendon injuries. J Hand Surg Am. 1989;14(1):72-6.

Colzani G, Tos P, Battiston B, Merolla G, Porcellini G, Artiaco S. Traumatic extensor tendon injuries to the hand: clinical anatomy, biomechanics, and surgical procedure review. J Hand Microsurg. 2016;8(01):002-12.

Mason ML. The treatment of open wounds of the hand. Surg Clin North Am. 1948;28(1):4-26.

Kelly AP Jr. Primary tendon repairs; a study of 789 consecutive tendon severances. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1959;41(4):581-664.

Minamikawa Y, Peimer CA, Yamaguchi T, Banasiak NA, Kambe K, Sherwin FS. Wrist position and extensor tendon amplitude following repair. J Hand Surg Am. 1992;17(2):268-71.

Strauch RJ.Extensor tendon injury. In: Wolfe SWW, Hotchkiss RN,Pederson WC, Kozin SH, Cohen MS(Eds). Green’s Operative Hand Surgery. 7thed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2017:152-82.

Chinchalkar SJ, Gan BS, McFarlane RM, King GJ, Roth JH. Extensor quadriga: Pathomechanics and treatment. Can J Plast Surg. 2004;12(4):174-8.

Chow JA, Dovelle S, Thomes LJ, Ho PK, Saldana J. A comparison of results of extensor tendon repair followed by early controlled mobilisation versus static immobilisation. J Hand Surg Br. 1989;14(1):18-20.

Griffin M, Hindocha S, Jordan D, Saleh M, Khan W. Management of extensor tendon injuries. Open Orthop J. 2012;6:36-42.

Patil RK, Koul AR. Early active mobilisation versus immobilisation after extrinsic extensor tendon repair: A prospective randomised trial. Indian J Plast Surg. 2012;45(1):29-37.

Wang ED. Tendon repair. J Hand Ther. 1998;11(2):105-10.

Gelberman RH, Amifl D, Gonsalves M, Woo S, Akeson WH. The influence of protected passive mobilization on the healing of flexor tendons: a biochemical and microangiographic study. Hand. 1981;13(2):120-8.

Talsma E, de Haart M, Beelen A, Nollet F. The effect of mobilization on repaired extensor tendon injuries of the hand: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(12):2366-72.

Ng CY, Chalmer J, Macdonald DJ, Mehta SS, Nuttall D, Watts AC. Rehabilitation regimens following surgical repair of extensor tendon injuries of the hand-a systematic review of controlled trials. J Hand Microsurg. 2012;4(2):65-73.

Crosby CA, Wehbé MA. Early protected motion after extensor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am. 1999;24(5):1061-70.

Khandwala AR, Blair J, Harris SB, Foster AJ, Elliot D. Immediate repair and early mobilization of the extensor pollicislongus tendon in zones 1 to 4. J Hand Surg Br. 2004;29(3):250-8.

Khandwala AR, Webb J, Harris SB, Foster AJ, Elliot D. A comparison of dynamic extension splinting and controlled active mobilization of complete divisions of extensor tendons in zones 5 and 6. J Hand Surg Br. 2000;25(2):140-6.

O'Dwyer FG, Quinton DN. Early mobilisation of acute middle slip injuries. J Hand Surg Br. 1990;15(4):404-6.

Chester DL, Beale S, Beveridge L, Nancarrow JD, Titley OG. A prospective, controlled, randomized trial comparing early active extension with passive extension using a dynamic splint in the rehabilitation of repaired extensor tendons. J Hand Surg Br. 2002;27(3):283-8.

Brüner S, Wittemann M, Jester A, Blumenthal K, Germann G. Dynamic splinting after extensor tendon repair in zones V to VII. J Hand Surg Br. 2003;28(3):224-7.

Hung LK, Chan A, Chang J, Tsang A, Leung PC. Early controlled active mobilization with dynamic splintage for treatment of extensor tendon injuries. J Hand Surg Am. 1990;15(2):251-7.

Saini N, Sharma M, Sharma VD, Patni P. Outcome of early active mobilization after extensor tendon repair. Indian J Orthop. 2008;42(3):336-41.

Sylaidis P, Youatt M, Logan A. Early active mobilization for extensor tendon injuries.The Norwich regime. J Hand Surg Br. 1997;22(5):594-6.

Docheva D, Müller SA, Majewski M, Evans CH. Biologics for tendon repair. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2015;84:222-39.

Dargan E, Woolf R. Management of extensor tendon injuries of the hand. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969;44(6):609.

Ip WY, Chow SP. Results of dynamic splintage following extensor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Br. 1997;22(2):283-7.

Downloads

Published

2021-02-23

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles