Clinical outcome comparison between LaPrade and Larson’s technique for posterolateral corner injury of knee

Authors

  • Natesh Kolusu Department of Orthopaedics, Ayaan Medical College, Moinabad, Telangana, India
  • G. Aravind Department of Orthopaedics, Nimrah Medical College, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India
  • Venkatesh Brungi Department of Orthopaedics, Virinchi Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20210626

Keywords:

Knee injury, Knee joint, LaPrade technique, Larson’s technique, Lysholm score

Abstract

Background: The knee joint is the largest synovial joint in the body. It is a modified hinge joint. It is a tri axial joint consisting of three articulations, patella-femoral, medial tibio-femoral and lateral tibio-femoral joint. The posterolateral corner (PLC) is often called the “dark side” of the knee due to its complexity and the minimal amount of research performed to better understand its anatomy and biomechanics. The present study was conducted to analyse the postoperative clinical outcome of Larson’s technique in one group and LaPrade technique in another group and elucidating which technique best restores stability and function to an isolated PLC injury.

Methods: This was a prospective study involving 40 patients with postero-lateral corner injuries (PCL) divided into two groups of 20 patients each. Larson’s reconstruction and LaPrade’s reconstruction techniques were done and the clinical outcomes were analyzed.

Results: Mean postoperative Lysholm score for Larson group was 78.10±10.26 with scores ranging from 58-92 with median value of 80.0. Mean postoperative Lysholm score for LaPrade group was 85.7±8.802 with scores ranging from 60-96 with median value of 87.0. Mean postoperative IKDC score for Larson group was 74.0±8.93 with scores ranging from 60-90 with median value of 75.0. Mean postoperative IKDC score for LaPrade group was 84.9±5.67 with scores ranging from 73-92 with median value of 85.5. This study recorded similar outcomes in both the groups.

Conclusions: The posterolateral knee reconstruction techniques presented here significantly improved objective stability in patients with a chronic posterolateral knee injury.

Author Biographies

Natesh Kolusu, Department of Orthopaedics, Ayaan Medical College, Moinabad, Telangana, India

ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR, DEPARTMENT OF ORTHOPAEDICS

G. Aravind, Department of Orthopaedics, Nimrah Medical College, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh, India

ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR, DEPARTMENT OF ORTHOPAEDICS

Venkatesh Brungi, Department of Orthopaedics, Virinchi Hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India

JUNIOR COUNSULTANT, DEPARTMENT OF ORTHOPAEDICS

References

LaPrade RF, Ly TV, Wentorf FA, Engebretsen L. The posterolateral attachments of the knee: a qualitative and quantitative morphologic analysis of the fibular collateral ligament, popliteus tendon, popliteofibular ligament, and lateral gastrocnemius tendon. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31:854-60.

LaPrade RF. Force measurements on the fibular collateral ligament, popliteofibular ligament, and popliteus tendon to applied loads. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32:1695-701.

Gollehon DL, Torzilli PA, Warren RF. The role of the posterolateral and cruciate ligaments in the stability of thehuman knee. A biomechanical study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69:233-42.

LaPrade RF, Terry GC. Injuries to the posterolateral aspect of the knee. Association of anatomic injury patterns with clinical instability. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25:433-8.

Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD, Albright JC. An analysis of the causes of failure in 57 consecutive posterolateral operative procedures. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:1419-30.

LaPrade RF, Hamilton CD, Engebretsen L. Treatment of acute and chronic combined anterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral knee ligament injuries. Sports Med Arthrosc. 1997;5:91-9.

Blackman AJ, Engasser WM, Krych AJ, Stuart MJ, Levy BA. Fibular head and tibial-based (2-tailed) posterolateral corner reconstruction. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2015;23:44-50.

LaPrade RF, Johansen S, Wentorf FA, Engebretsen L, Esterberg JL, Tso A. An analysis of an anatomical posterolateral knee reconstruction: an in vitro biomechanical study and development of a surgical technique. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32:1405-14.

Miyatake S, Kondo E, Tsai TY, Hirschmann M, Halewood C, Jakobsen BW, et al. Biomechanical comparisons between 4-strand and modified Larson 2-strand procedures for reconstruction of the posterolateral corner of the knee. Am J Sports Med. 2011;39(7):1462-9.

Moulton SG, Geeslin AG, LaPrade RF. A systematic review of the outcomes of posterolateral corner knee injuries, part 2: Surgical treatment of chronic injuries. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:1616-23.

Yoon KH, Bae DK, Ha JH, Park SW. Anatomic reconstructive surgery for posterolateral instability of the knee. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:159-65.

Bicos J, Arciero RA. Novel approach for reconstruction ofthe posterolateral corner using a free tendon graft technique. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2006;14:28-36.

Fanelli GC, Larson RV. Practical management of posterolateralinstability of the knee. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:1-8.

LaPrade RF, Wentorf FA, Crum JA. Assessment of healingof grade III posterolateral corner injuries: an in vivo model. J Orthop Res. 2004;22:970-5.

Griffith CJ, Wijdicks CA, Goerke U, Michaeli S, Ellermann J, LaPrade RF. Outcomes of untreatedposterolateral knee injuries: an in vivo canine model. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011;19:1192-7.

Black BS, Stannard JP. Repair versus reconstruction inacute posterolateral instability of the knee. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2015;23:22-6.

Yoon KH, Bae DK, Ha JH, Park SW. Anatomic reconstructive surgery for posterolateral instability of the knee. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:159-65.

Geeslin AG, Moulton SG, LaPrade RF. A systematic review of the outcomes of posterolateral corner knee injuries. Part 1. Surgical treatment of acute injuries. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:1336-42.

Downloads

Published

2021-02-23

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles