DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20160712

Outcome of locking plate fixation for proximal humerus fractures

Neil Rohra, Jimmy Chokshi, Rishi Sanghavi

Abstract


Background: The objective of the study was to evaluate functional outcome of open reduction and internal fixation with proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS) plate for proximal humerus fractures.

Methods: We reviewed 30 patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation with PHILOS plate between the years 2010 to 2015. There were 23 men and7 women with a mean age of 36 years (range 20-64).There were 22 patients in the age group of <60 years and 8 patients in the age group of >60 years. According to Neer classification system, 12, 11 and 4 patients had2-part, 3-part, and 4-part fractures, respectively and 2 patients had 4-part fracture dislocation. All surgeries were carried out at our tertiary care trauma center. Functional evaluation of the shoulder at final follow-up was done using Neer’s Evaluation Criteria.

Results: The mean follow-up period was 20 months (range 14-40 months). All fractures united clinically and radio logically. The mean time for radiological union was 13.2 weeks (range 9-26 weeks).At the final follow-up the mean Neer’s Evaluation Criteria was 90 (range 76-100). The results were excellent in 17patients, Satisfactory in 8 patients, Unsatisfactory in 4 patients and Failure in 1 patient. During the follow-up, 3 cases of varus malunion, 1 case of failure of fixation were noted. No cases of AVN, hardware failure, locking screw loosening, infection or nonunion were noted.

Conclusions: PHILOS provides stable fixation in proximal humerus fractures. In order to prevent the complications like avascular necrosis, knowledge of anatomy and vascular supply of head of humerus and good surgical dissection to preserve vascularity of humeral head is important.


Keywords


Proximal humerus, PHILOS

Full Text:

PDF

References


Geiger EV, Maier M, Kelm A. Functional outcome and complications following PHILOS plate fi xation in proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2010;44(1):1-6.

Baron JA, Barrett JA, Karagas MR. The epidemiology of peripheral fractures. Bone. 1996;18(3 Suppl):209S-13.

Lanting B, MacDermid J, Drosdowech D, et al. Proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review of treatment modalities. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17(1):42-54.

Lee SH, Dargent-Molina P, Breart G. Risk factors for fractures of the proximal humerus: results from the EPIDOS prospective study. J Bone Miner Res. 2002;17(5):817-25.

Nguyen TV, Center JR, Sambrook PN. Risk factors for proximal humerus, forearm, and wrist fractures in elderly men and women: the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;153(6):587-95.

Nho SJ, Brophy RH, Barker JU, et al. Innovations in the management of displaced proximal humerus fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;15(1):12-26.

Park MC, Murthi AM, Roth NS. Two-part and three-part fractures of the proximal humerus treated with suture fixation. J Orthop Trauma 2003;17(5):319-25.

Ogiwara N, Aoki M, Okamura K. Ender nailing for unstable surgical neck fractures of the humerus in elderly patients. ClinOrthopRelat Res. 1996;(330):173-80.

Resch H, Povacz P, Fröhlich R. Percutaneous fixation of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79(2):295-300.

Robinson CM, Page RS, Hill RM. Primary hemiarthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(7):1215-23.

Sadowski C, Riand N, Stern R. Fixation of fractures of the proximal humerus with the Plant Tan Humerus Fixator Plate: early experience with a new implant. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003;12(2):148-51.

Björkenheim JM, Pajarinen J, Savolainen V. Internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with a locking compression plate: a retrospective evaluation of 72 patients followed for a minimum of 1 year. Acta Orthop Scand. 2004;75(6):741-5.

Fankhauser F, Boldin C, Schippinger G. A new locking plate for unstable fractures of the proximal humerus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;(430):176-81.

Lill H, Hepp P, Rose T. The angle stable lockingproximal- humerus-plate (LPHP) for proximal humeral fractures using a small anterior-lateral-deltoid-splitting-approach technique and first results. ZentralblChir. 2004;129(1):43-8.

Siffri PC, Peindl RD, Coley ER. Biomechanical analysis of blade plate versus locking plate fixation for a proximal humerus fracture: comparison using cadaveric and synthetic humeri. J Orthop Trauma 2006;20(8):547-54.

Walsh S, Reindl R, Harvey E, et al. Biomechanical comparison of a unique locking plate versus a standard plate for internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures in a cadaveric model. ClinBiomech. 2006;21(10):1027-31.

Papadopoulos P, Karataglis D, Stavridis SI. Midterm results of internal fi xation of proximal humeral fractures with the PHILOS plate. Injury. 2009;40(12):1292-6.

Gardner MJ, Weil Y, Barker JU. The importance ofmedial support in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21(3):185-91

Wijgman AJ, Roolker W, Patt TW. Open reductionand internal fixation of three and four-part fractures of the proximal part of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg. 2002;84(11):1919-25.

Gardner MJ, Voos JE, Wanich T, et al. Vascular implications of minimally invasive plating of proximal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20(9):602-7.

Liew AS, Johnson JA, Patterson SD. Effect of screw placement on fi xation in the humeral head. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2000;9(5):423-6.

Moonot P, Ashwood N, Hamlet M. Early results for treatment of three and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus using the PHILOS plate system. J Bone Joint SurgBr. 2007;89(9):1206-9.

Egol KA, Ong CC, Walsh M. Early complications in proximal humerus fractures (OTA Types 11) treated with locked plates. J Orthop Trauma. 2008;22(3):159-64.

Owsley KC, Gorczyca JT. Fracture displacement and screw cutout after open reduction and locked plate fixation ofproximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(2):233-40.

Agudelo J, SchürmannM, Stahel P. Analysis of efficacy and failure in proximal humerus fractures treated with locking plates. J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21(10):676-81.

Koukakis A, Apostolou CD, Taneja T. Fixation of proximal humerus fractures using the PHILOS plate: early experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;442:115-20.

Hepp P, Theopold J, Voigt C. The surgical approach for locking plate osteosynthesis of displaced proximal humeral fractures influences the functional outcome. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17(1):21-8.

Esser RD. Treatment of three- and four-part fractures of the proximal humerus with a modified cloverleaf plate. J Orthop Trauma. 1994;8(1):15-22.

Lee CK, Hansen HR. Post-traumatic avascular necrosis of the humeral head in displaced proximal humeral fractures. J Trauma. 1981;21(9):788-91.

Gerber C, Werner CM, Vienne P. Internal fixation of complex fractures of the proximal humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86(6):848-55.

Hawkins RJ, Bell RH, Gurr K. The three-part fracture of the proximal part of the humerus. Operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68(9):1410-4.

Bastian JD, Hertel R. Initial post-fracture humeral head ischemia does not predict development of necrosis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17(1):2-8.

Gerber C, Hersche O, Berberat C. The clinical relevance of post-traumatic avascular necrosis of the humeral head. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1998;7(6):586-90.

Solberg BD, Moon CN, Franco DP. Locked plating of 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures in older patients: the effect of initial fracture pattern on outcome. J Orthop Trauma. 2009;23(2):113-9.

Hertel R, Hempfing A, Stiehler M. Predictors of humeral head ischemia after intracapsular fracture of the proximalhumerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004;13(4):427-33.