DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20202047

Comparative study of fixation of intertrochanteric fracture of the femur by proximal femur nail versus dynamic hip screw

H. B. Shivakumar, Ramalingaiah Yatish, Channappa T. Seetharam, Manju Jayaram, Amith Kamath K.

Abstract


Background: Intertrochanteric fractures are common in old age group, but uncommon in younger age group. The goal of treatment of intertrochanteric fractures is restoration to pre-injury status at the earliest. The purpose of this study is to compare the functional outcome of the two fixation devices proximal femur nail (PFN) and dynamic hip screw available for intertrochanteric fractures in terms of the eventual functional outcome of the patient.

Methods: Prospective study of 30 cases of Intertrochanteric fractures admitted and operated in KIMS hospital from November 2017 to May 2019. Follow-up of these patients was done at 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks with functional evaluation was done using Harris hip score at the 24th week.

Results: The results at the end of 24 weeks follow-up were calculated by the Harris hip score were better with the PFN. 66.7% of the patients operated with PFN gave excellent results as compared to 60% of patients operated with dynamic hip screw (DHS).

Conclusions: We conclude that the use of PFN for the fixation of trochanteric fractures against the proven DHS offered better results along with a few advantages. PFN required smaller incision, shorter duration of surgery, less blood loss and faster recovery and better functional outcome at the end of 24 weeks. But still PFN is technically more demanding than the DHS and was found to have longer fluoroscopy exposure.

 

 


Keywords


Intertrochanteric fractures, Proximal femur nail, Dynamic hip screw, Harris hip score

Full Text:

PDF

References


Pajarinen J, Lindahl J, Michelsson O, Savolainen V, Hirvensalo E. Pertrochanteric femoral fracture treated with a dynamic hip screw or a proximal femoral nail. J Bone Joint Surg. 2005;87:76-81.

David GL. Fractures of Hip. In: Canale ST, editor. Campbell’s Operative Orthopaedics. 10th ed. Mosby; 2003: 2873-2897.

Panagopoulos A, Papas M, Papadopoulos AX, Tyllianakis M, Megas P, Lambiris E. Long term results and complications of gamma nail and proximal femoral nail in pertrochanteric hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004;86:183.

Saudan M, Lubbeke A, Sadowski C, Riand N, Stern R, Hoffmeyer P. Pertrochanteric fractures: is there an advantage to an intramedullary nail? A randomized, prospective study of 206 patients comparing the dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail. J Orthop Trauma. 2001;16:386-93.

Hornby R, Evans JG, Vardon V. Operative or Conservative Treatment for Trochanteric Fractures of the Femur. J Bone Joint Surg. 1989;71:619-23.

Nuber S, Schonweiss T, Ruter A. Stabilization of unstable trochanteric femoral fractures: Dynamic hip screw with trochanteric stabilization plate vs. proximal femoral nail. J Orthop Trauma. 2003;17(4):316-7.

Prasad DV. Comparative study between DHS and PFN in the management of trochanteric and subtrochanteric femoral fractures. Int J Orthop Sci. 2017;3(4):106-8.

Mundla MKR, Shaik MR, Buchupalli SR, Chandranna B. A prospective comparative study between proximal femoral nail and dynamic hip screw treatment in trochanteric fractures of femur. Int J Res Orthop. 2018;4(1):58-64.

Portakal S, Utkan A, Dayican A, Ozkan G, Karaman Y, Tumoz MA. Treatment of trochanteric femoral fractures with the proximal femoral nail. J Bone Joint Surg. 2006;88:183-4.

Cruz-Ocaña E, Rodríguez-García MA, Garcia-Herrera Taillefer G, Guerado-Parra E. Complications of using PFN nail in the treatment of extracapsular fractures of the proximal femur. J Bone Joint Surg. 2005;87(1):86.