DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20195565

A prospective study on outcome of function after proximal row carpectomy

Chaitanya Gadi, S. M. Venugopal, Bhaskaranand Kumar, Karthik Gudaru

Abstract


Background: Proximal row carpectomy (PRC) is a procedure with varied indications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate functional outcomes with PRC in wrist flexion deformities, neuromuscular disorders and also post-traumatic wrist arthritis.

Methods: A prospective study was performed on all patients who underwent PRC between April 2015 and December 2017, in BIRRD (T) hospital, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh with a minimum follow up of 6 months. Outcome was assessed in terms of range of motion (ROM), grip strength, quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (QDASH) score and pain score. Data was analyzed using the Student t-test.

Results: Thirty-two patients underwent PRC of which 12 are neuromuscular disorders, 10 are wrist flexion deformities, 10 are post-traumatic wrist arthritis. On the final follow-up, significant improvement in ROM was observed in wrist flexion deformities and neuromuscular disorders, whereas grip strength and QDASH scores showed a significant difference in post-traumatic wrist arthritis. Pain was studied only in post-traumatic wrist arthritis, all were very much pleased with pain reduction.

Conclusions: PRC is fairly a reliable procedure for all the indications in our study. We consider that PRC is a promising procedure in correcting wrist flexion deformities. Though there has been significant improvement in all the parameters for all the cases, we consider this procedure is best suited for post-traumatic arthritis group.


Keywords


QDASH, PRC, Post-traumatic arthritis, Neuromuscular disorders, Wrist flexion deformity, ROM, Grip strength

Full Text:

PDF

References


Inglis AE, Jones EC. Proximal row carpectomy for diseases of the proximal row. J Bone Joint Surg. 1977;59A:400-3.

Rettig ME, Raskin KB. Long-term assessment of proximal row carpectomy for chronic perilunate dislocations. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1999;24:1231-6.

Baumeister S, Germann G, Dragu A, Tränkle M, Sauerbier M. Functional results after proximal row carpectomy (PRC) in patients with SNAC-/SLAC-wrist stage II [in German]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2005;37(2):106–12.

White, JW, Stubbins, SG. Carpectomy for intractable flexion deformities of the wrist. J Bone Joint Surg. 1944;26:131–8.

Ali MH, Rizzo M, Shin AY, Moran SL. Long-term outcomes of proximal row carpectomy: a minimum of 15-year follow-up. Hand (NY). 2012;7:72–8.

Stamm TT. Excision of the proximal row of the carpus. Proc R Sot Med. 1944;38:74-5.

Crabbe WA. Excision of the proximal row of the carpus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1964;46:708-11.

Jorgensen EC. Proximal row carpectomy. An end-result study of twenty-two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51:1104-1.

Culp RW, McGuigan FX, Turner MA, Lichtman DM, Osterman AL, McCarroll HR. Proximal row carpectomy: a multicenter study. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1993;18:19-25.

Wall LB, Didonna ML, Kiefhaber TR, Stern PJ. Proximal row carpectomy: minimum 20-year follow-up. J Hand Surg Am. 2013;38 (8):1498-504.

Didonna ML, Kiefhaber TR, Stern PJ. Proximal row carpectomy: study with a minimum of ten years of followup. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A(11): 2359-65.

Jebson PJL, Hayes EP, Engber WD. Proximal row carpectomy: a minimum 10-year follow-up study. J Hand Surg Am. 2003;28(4):561–9.

Liu M, Zhou HT, Yang ZM, Huang FG, Pei FX, Xiang Z. Clinical evaluation of proximal row carpectomy revealed by follow-up for 10–29 years. Int Orthop. 2009;33(5):1315–21.

Stern PJ, Agabegi SS, Kiefhaber TR, Didonna ML. Proximal row carpectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:166-74.

Croog AS, Stern PJ. Proximal row carpectomy for advanced Kienböck's disease: average 10-year follow-up. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33(7):1122–30.

Lumsden BC, Stone A, Engber WD. Treatment of advanced-stage Kienbock's disease with proximal row carpectomy: an average 15-year follow-up. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33:493–502.