A study of clinicoradiological and functional outcomes of intramedullary nailing in diaphyseal radius ulna fractures


  • Parag M. Tank Department of Orthopaedics, Smt. NHL Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
  • Yash S. Shah Department of Orthopaedics, Smt. NHL Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
  • Rutvik D. Dave Department of Orthopaedics, Smt. NHL Municipal Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
  • Vijay J. Patel Department of Orthopaedics, G.M.E.R.S. Medical College, Himmatnagar, Gujarat, India




Radius ulna fracture, Intramedullary nailing, Diaphyseal fractures, Closed fixation


Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of intramedullary nailing in diaphyseal fractures of radius and ulna in age group of 10 to 49 years and to understand its clinicoradiological and functional results.

Methods: This is a retrospective case series study of forearm bone fractures and the selected management for the same over a period of 3 years. We chose the cases in which intramedullary nailing was the treatment modality which were followed up over a period of minimum 6 months. Patients with galeazzi variety, monteggia variety, pathological fracture or non-union after previous surgery were excluded. The outcomes were then evaluated with disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score, Green and O’Brien score, and Grace and Eversmann functional outcome score.

Results: Of the 22 patients, 10 patients had excellent functional outcome according to Grace and Eversmann score, 7 patients had good outcome, 4 patients had acceptable while 1 was unacceptable. Green and O’Brien also had similar results, except that patients among fair category were 3 and poor category were 3. The mean DASH score was 16.2.

Conclusions: This study shows that closed method for fixation by intramedullary nailing of both bone forearm fractures leads to excellent to good functional outcomes (according to DASH score, Green and O Brien, and Grace and Eversmann score) with less complications. In 6 months follow up x ray there is radiological union in all cases with no angulation, malunion or non-union. 


Kim SB, Heo YM, Yi JW, Lee JB, Lim BG. Shaft Fractures of Both Forearm Bones: The Outcomes of Surgical Treatment with Plating Only and Combined Plating and Intramedullary Nailing. Clin Orthop Surg. 2015;7(3):282–90.

Wilson FC, Dirschl DR, Bynum DK. Fractures of the radius and ulna in adults: an analysis of factors affecting outcome Iowa Orthop J. 1997;17:14–9.

George AV, Lawton JN. Management of Complications of Forearm Fractures. Hand Clin. 2015;31(2):217–33.

Lee SK, Kim KJ, Lee JW, Choy WS. Plate osteosynthesis versus intramedullary nailing for both forearm bones fractures. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014;24(5):769-76.

Street DM. Intramedullary forearm nailing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;(212):219-30.

Kapoor V, Theruvil B, Edwards SE, Taylor GR, Clarke NMP, Uglow MG. Flexible intramedullary nailing of displaced diaphyseal forearm fractures in children. Injury. 2005;36(10):1221–5.

Sahu B, Mishra A, Tudu B. Management of pediatric both-bone forearm fractures by titanium elastic nailing system: A prospective study of 40 cases. J Orthop Traumatol Rehabil. 2018;10(2):103-6.

Dhariwal Q, Inamdar P, Arora P, Shyam A. Stacked Flexible Nailing for Radius Ulna Fractures: Revival of a lost Technique. J Orthop Case Rep. 2017;7(1):106–8.

Agarwal A , Gedam P, Patel HB, Phunde R, Bharuka A. Functional Outcome of Plating versus Nailing in Adult Midshaft Radius-Ulna Fractures. J Cont Med A Dent. 2017;5(2).

Azboy I, Demirtaş A, Alemdar C, Gem M, Uzel K, Arslan H. A newly designed intramedullary nail for the treatment of diaphyseal forearm fractures in adults. IJO. 2017;51(6):697-703.






Original Research Articles