Published: 2019-08-26

Study of management of supracondylar femoral fracture using dynamic condylar screw

Lalith Mohan, Ramesh Benguluri


Background: Supracondylar femoral fracture poses a considerable therapeutic challenge. Operative treatment has become a standardized procedure. Stabilization has usually been achieved by an osteosynthesis with dynamic condylar screws or retrograde supracondylar nailing. In this article we are going to compare the results of surgical management of supracondylar nail and dynamic condylar screw. The aim is to study the effectiveness of dynamic condylar screw in surgical management of supracondylar fractures of femur.

Methods: Prospective study of patients who had sustained supracondylar fracture of femur. The patients included in this study were those with supracondylar fractures of the femur with or without articular involvement and disruption of the joint surface. Study was done for a period of two and half years.

Results: In our study of 21 cases, there were 8 patients (38%) who had associated fractures. Two patients were more than 50 yrs. 3 patients had compound injury which were grade-II of Gustilo Anderson classification. One of them developed post-operative infection and resulted in poor outcome. Other 2 patients had decrease range of movements resulted in fair outcome. Type C2 constituted highest number 8 (38%) followed by type A3 which was 28.5% i.e., 8 patients. Infection is observed in 9.5% of patients. 2 patients had implant failure and both were due to early weight bearing. In our study excellent and good results were found to be in 61.9%.

Conclusions: Role of dynamic compression screw in the surgical management of supracondylar fractures of the femur minimizes the risk of complications.


Dynamic compression screw, Supracondylar fractures, Articular involvement

Full Text:



Bucholz R, Heckman J, Court-brown C. Rockwood and Green’s fractures in adults. In: Bucholz R, Heckman J, Court-brown C (eds). A Book. 6th edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009.

Albert MJ. Supracondylar fractures of the femur. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1997;5(3):163-71.

Handolin L, Pajarinen J, Lindahl J, Hirvensalo E. Retrograde intramedullary nailing in supracondylar femoral fractures - The Töölö hospital experience. J Blood SOT. 2002;25:46-51.

Sven O, Goran K. Secondary intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures. J Bone and Joint Surg. 1972;54:1419-28.

Harrison T, Robinson P, Cook A, Parker MJ. Factors affecting the incidence of deep wound infection after hip fracture surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94(2):237–40.

Siliski JM, Mahring M, Hofer HP. Supracondylar-intercondylar fractures of the femur. Treatment by internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989;71(1):95-104.

Giles JB, DeLee JC, Heckman JD, Keever JE. Supracondylar-intercondylar frac- tures of the femur treated with a supracondylar plate and lag screw. J Bone Joint Surg [Am]. 1982;64:864-70.

Pritchett JW. Supracondylar fractures of the femur. Clin Orthop. 1984;184:173-7.

Sanders R, Regazzoni P, Ruedi TP. Treatment of supracondylar-intracondylar frac- tures of the femur using the dynamic condylar screw. J Orthop Trauma. 1989;3:214-22.

Surulivel VJ, Ganesan GR, Rajasekeran R. Dynamic condylar screw versus supacondylar nail in the management of supracondylar fracture distal femur. Int Surg J. 2015;2:373-6.

Gellman RE, Paiement GD, Green HD, Coughlin RR. Treatment of Supracondylar Femoral Fractures With a Retrograde Intramedullary Nail. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;(332):90-7.

Leung KS, Shen WY, So WS, Mui LT, Grosse A. Interlocking intramedullary nailing for supracondylar and intercondylar fractures of the distal part of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73(3):332-40.

Mize RD, Buchloz RW, Grogan DP. Surgical treatment of displaced communited fractures of the distal end of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg. 1982;64:871-9.

Jeon IH, Oh CW, Kim SJ, Park BC, Kyung HS, Ihn JC. Minimally invasive percutaneous plating of distal femoral fractures using the dynamic condylar screw. J Trauma. 2004;57(5):1048-52.