Comparative study between transforaminal epidural selective nerve root block versus interlaminar epidural in the treatment of lumbar radicular leg pain
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20192686Keywords:
Transforaminal epidural, Interlaminar epiduralAbstract
Background: Sciatic neuralgia is a result of nerve root oedema because of the inflammatory, immunological and mechanical factors. Steroid injections play an important role in the management of sciatic radiculopathy. Steroids act by reducing the oedema around the nerve roots and decreasing pain. Locally administered steroids have the advantage of reduced dosage and targeted delivery around the nerve roots. This forms the basis of epidural steroid injections. This can be given around the nerve root in the transforaminal space or in the interlaminar space. There is a paucity of literature comparing the two techniques of epidural steroid injections. We have done a randomized comparative trial, to compare the effectiveness of the two modalities of injection in the management of a single level unilateral foraminal disc herniation.
Methods: Patients were randomized in two groups Group A: Transforaminal epidural (SNRB) and Group B: interlaminar epidural. Same dose of steroid was used in each group.
Results: Immediate post injection, 2 week and 1 month transforaminal epidural (SNRB) was better compare to interlaminar epidural however at the end of 3 months the difference was not significant (p=0.08).
Conclusions: Both transforaminal and interlaminar epidural injection are effective form of treatment in mild to moderate grade of disc disease. Both the technique provide short lasting relief in the symptoms associated with disc pathology, however pain management is better in transforaminal group compared to interlaminar group. Thus these techniques can be considered for delaying surgery and providing intermitant relief.
References
Price C, Arden N, Coglan L, Rogers P. Cost-effectiveness and safety of epidural steroids in the management of sciatica. Health Technol Assess. 2005;9:1–58.
Waddell G. The Back Pain Revolution. 2nd ed. Churchill Livingstone; 2004.
Fairbank JC. Sciatic: an archaic term. Br Med J. 2007;335:112.
Koes BW, van Tulder MW, Peul WC. Diagnosis and treatment of sciatica. Br Med J. 2007;334:1313-7.
Heliovaara M, Impivaara O, Sievers K, Melkas T, Knekt P, Korpi J, et al. Lumbar disc syndrome in Finland. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1987;41:251–8.
Konstantinou K, Dunn KM. Sciatica: review of epidemiological studies and prevalence estimates. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33:2464–72.
Karppinen J, Ohinmaa A, Malmivaara A, Kurunlahti M, Kyllönen E, Pienimäki T, et al. Cost effectiveness of periradicular infiltration for sciatica: subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26:2587–95.
Stafford MA, Peng P, Hill DA. Sciatica: a review of history, epidemiology, pathogenesis, and the role of epidural steroid injection in management. Br J Anaesth. 2007;99:461-73.
Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland Morris Disability Questioinaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionaire. Spine. 2000;25:3115-24.
Mobaleghi J, Allahdini F, Nasseri K, Ahsan B, Shami S, Faizi M, et al. Comparing the effects of epidural methylprednisolone acetate injected in patients with pain due to lumbar spinal stenosis or herniated disks: a prospective study. Int J Gen Med. 2011;4:875-8.
Blankenbaker DG, De Smet AA, Stanczak JD, Fine JP. Fine. Lumbar Radiculopathy: Treatment with Selective Lumbar Nerve Blocks- Comparison of Effectiveness of Triamcinolone and Betamethasone Injectable Suspensions. Radiology. 2005;237:738-41.
Singh S, Kumar S, Chahal G, Verma R. Selective nerve root blocks vs. caudal epidural injection for single level prolapsed lumbar intervertebral disc - A prospective randomized study. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2017;8(2):142-7.
Arun-Kumar K, Jayaprasad S, Senthil K, Lohith H, Jayaprakash KV. The Outcomes of Selective Nerve Root Block for Disc Induced Lumbar Radiculopathy. Malays Orthop J. 2015;9(3):17-22.
