Published: 2019-04-26

Role of locking compression plate in management of metaphyseal fractures in osteoporotic bones: an experimental study from rural Maharashtra

Prasanna Rathi, Kiran P. Paknikar, Shekhar P. Malve, Govind S. Kulkarni, Milind G. Kulkarni, Sunil G. Kulkarni, Anant A. Takalkar


Background: Osteoporosis is multi factorial disease, which is caused by complex interaction between genetic and environmental factors that influence bone turnover, bone mass, skeletal geometry and risk factors. Distal femur fracture needs aggressive management in terms of open reduction and internal fixation with locking compression plate and early mobilization. Objectives were to study the role of locking compression plate in the management of osteoporotic metaphyseal fractures.

Methods: Present study is a prospective study comprising of 50 patients who sustained various fractures in different bones of body due to osteoporosis and were treated using locking compression plate (LCP). All patients were evaluated for effectiveness of LCP.

Results: In present series majority of patients (44%) fall in age group of 61-70 years having senile osteoporosis, followed by 12 (24%) from 51-60 years age group. Majority of the cases involved were distal femur fractures (50%). 15 i.e. 30% cases were fracture of proximal tibia and 20% were fracture of proximal humerus. 96% had osteoporosis. C1 type of fracture was commonly seen in 6 (12%) patients. The mean constant score at one month was 58 and at the end of one year it was 80. The mean oxford score at one month was 28 and at the end of one year it was 38.

Conclusions: Locking compression plate is an ideal implant for fixation in metaphyseal osteoporotic bones when used methodically.


Locking compression plate, Metaphyseal fractures, Osteoporotic bones

Full Text:



Eisman JA. Genetics of osteoporosis. Endocrinol Rev. 1999;20:788-804.

Heany RP. Pathophysiology of osteoporosis. Endocrinolmetab Clin North Am. 1998;27:256-65.

Burr DB, Forwood MR, Martin RB. Bone micro damage and skeletal fragility in osteoporotic and stress fractures. J Bone miner Res. 1997;12:6-15.

Abel EW, Sun J. Mechanical evaluation of a new minimum-contact plate for internal fracture fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 1998;12:383-6.

Ebeling PR. Osteoporosis in men New insights into Etiology and management. Drugs Aging. 1998;13:421-34.

Generi C, Martini G, Nuti R. Secondary Osteoporosis. Aging (Milano). 1998;10:214-24.

Gruber HE, Baylink DJ. The diagnosis of Osteoporosis. J American Geriatric Society. 1981;29;490-7.

Muller ME, Nazarian S, Koch P, Schatzker J. The comprehensive classification of fractures of long bones. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1990: 1-5.

Fankhauser F, Boldin C, Schippinger G, Haunschmid C and Szyszkowitz R. A new locking plate for unstable fractures of the proximal humerus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;430:176–81.

Apley Ag. Editorial-An assessment of assessment. J Bone Joint Surg(Br). 1990;72:957-8.

Schütz M, Müller M, Krettek C, Höntzsch D, Regazzoni P, Ganz R, Haas N. Minimally invasive fracture stabilization of distal femoral fractures with the LISS: A prospective multicenter study. Results of a clinical study with special emphasis on difficult cases. Injury. 2001;32(3):48–54.

O’brien PJ, Meek RM, Blachut PA, Broekhuyse, HM. Fractures of the distal femur. Chapter 48. Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in Adults. Sixth edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006: 1915-1967.

Krettek C, Muller M, Miclau T. Evolution of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in the femur. Injury. 2001;32(3):14-23.

Cole PA, Kregor PJ. Prospective clinical trial of the less invasive stabilization system (LISS) for proximal tibia fractures, in Orthopaedic Trauma Association 16th Annual Meeting Final Program. Rosemont, IL: Orthopaedic Trauma Association; 2000: 344.

Kregor PJ, Stannard J, Zlowodzki M, Cole PA, Alonso J. Distal femoral fracture fixation utilizing the Less Invasive Stabilization System (L.I.S.S.): The technique and early results. Injury. 2001;32:32-47.