DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20182734

Ponseti technique: efficacy in idiopathic clubfoot in Indian population

Neetin Mahajan, Ujwal Ramteke, Sandeep Gavhale, Nikhil Palange, Akash Mane, Harshit Dave

Abstract


Background: The number of operations for clubfoot is many, but the results are not encouraging and more complications are encountered after operative treatment. Most surgeons believe manipulation to be easy; however they rarely complete the treatment and abandon it and go on to surgery. In the confusing scenario Ponseti Method evolved and proved across the world to be one of the most promising ways to correct club foot with low cost minimum surgery and good result in short period of time.

Methods: 50 cases of idiopathic clubfeet (76 feet) were enrolled from a period of May 2006 to May 2008 in the department of Orthopaedic. Out of 50, 42 patients were followed-up for two years. Post tenotomy follow-up done every monthly for 3 months. At every visit babies were checked for any relapse and parents were counselled for the strict compliance with Foot Abduction Brace. The results of correction in 42 patients (64 feets) evaluated and compared with Ponseti's observation and other form of conservative management.

Results: The analysis of results of correction of clubfeet deformity by Ponseti's method reveals around 95.30% of good to acceptable result as compared with Ponseti’s observation of around 99% which is comparable. We have observed 4.69% of poor result as compared with 1% observed by Ponseti.

Conclusions: It is safe, efficient, Economical and most effective treatment for clubfoot which decreases the need for extensive corrective surgery. This technique can be used in children up to one year of age even after previous unsuccessful non-surgical treatment.


Keywords


Clubfoot, Idiopathic clubfoot, CTEV, Ponseti’s method

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bertelsen A. Treatment of congenital clubfoot. J Bone Joint Surg (br). 1957;39:599.

Attenborough GG. Severe congenital talpies equinovarus. J Bone Joint Surg. 1966;46:31.

Beatson TR, Pearson JR. A method of assessing correction in club feet. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1966;48(1):40-50.

Bohm M. The embryologic origin of clubfoot. J Bone Joint Surg. 1929: 229.

Ippolito E, Ponseti IV. Congenital club foot in the human fetus. A histological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;62(1):8-22.

Kite HJ. Principles involved in treatment of clubfoot. J Bone Joint Surg. 1939;2:595.

Ponseti IV. Observation on Pathogenesis and treatment of congenital, clubfoot. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1972;84:50-60.

Ponseti IV. Clubfoot management, J Paediatric Ortho. 2000;20(6):699-700.

WHO I. 2003;81(9):629-97.

Hippocrates, Francis Adam: The Genuine Works of Hippocrates. (Translated from Greek). Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore.

Stewart SF. Clubfoot Its incidence, cause and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg. 1951;33:3.

Ponseti IV. Common errors in the treatment of Congenital clubfoot. Int Orthop 1997;21(2):137-41.

Kite HJ. Non-operative treatment of congenital clubfoot. Clin Orthop Related Res. 1972;84:29.

Fripp AT, Shaw NE. idiopathic Clubfoot. J Bone Joint Surg. 1967;2:595.

Dangel major RC. A review of 200 clubfeet. Bulletin of the Hospital for Special Surgery, 1961;4:38.